United States The Glowie Infestation: No Longer a Fringe Excuse

Basics of glowies

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Glowie / Glowni**er: Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark." The most common trappings of government shills are their inability/hesitation to use the major racial slurs, improper use of memes, and the pushing of mainstream political theories.

The term originates from schizophrenic computer programmer Terry Davis (RIP), who claimed in 2017 that "CIA ni**ers glow in the dark" in a video. Glowposting is used to refer to agents who post bait content on the internet.

The idea of glowies has been almost as old as secret services and police, however it used to be referred more as infiltrator and double agents before. The new term has popularize the idea by giving it a catchier name and better explaining it, and pointing out the main difference between the modern glowie and their forefathers from the older days: Their incompetence at their jobs. Weather older double agents and infiltrators who trained hard to make their way into the Mafia or terrorist groups were decent at their jobs and truly worked into it, the glowie is painfully bad and almost comedic levels of incompetent, remaining alive only because the "dangerous extremist groups" they infiltrate are simply not as dangerous as they like to claim when asking for millions and millions of dollars in funding from politicians and bureaucrats who also know nothing about the groups they are fighting against.

The term has now entered the cultural zeitgeist of the USA in force since the Jan 6th "insurrection", as it became clear in the following weeks that far from the media narrative of a organized coup by the "alt-right" Trump Supporters, the conflagration was the result of much of the mob being simply allowed inside of the building. The damage? Minimal. The loss of life? One, not the multiple implied by headlines, a single woman shot by security despite a large wooden door between them that was not even close to being broken down. And then there is the glowies themselves.

As soon as the protesters involved began to be prosecuted people noticed how many witnesses there were ready to testify, whose names are never shown and people who had to have been on the ground to claim those things under oath, but none of them were being prosecuted. And not in a plea deal, they had no names attached. Tucker Carlson would call them out on his show, ensuring that, even if they didn't know the specific name, most of the mainstream conservatives would now be aware of the concept.

In 2020, news broke of a plot to kidnap a US Governor in a blatant act of terrorism. Months later, we find out that of the 12 agents were involved, along with 8 witnesses from the FBI.

They had literally a 2-to-1 ratio of Fed-to-Terrorist


What about the "Justice for Jan 6th" rally on September 28th? A event that came from nowhere, asked Trump Supporters to come protest in the middle of D.C. and then had the media talk about it for a week and the DHS warn it was "gonna be bad"... Only for people to wise up and not show. We did, however, get to see glowie on fed violence as the only arrest was the D.C. local police surrounding a man with what appeared to be a concealed carry gun only for him to turn out to be a glowie. And, of course, do not forget the other Glowie group, a bit more (or less, depending on your point of view) trained who were all standing around with the same outfit looking 100% legit?


E_mBsQcWEAM-J8i


And, not a week ago, we saw the pathetic attempt to frame Youngkin as alt-right with the totally legit Charlottesville alt-right protesters taking a photo in front of his bus and then having Twitter boost it. It failed, pathetically, as people realized that white-supremacists wouldn't exactly include a black guy. And those people look suspiciously like Democrat party members involved with McAuliffe's campaign. In the end the Lincoln Project claimed it was "just a prank bro" while not explaining why they had retweeted claims that it was real.



These are just proven examples of glowies. There are more which might be but we don't have solid proof. I propose we use this thread to store any possible glowies for future reference and to keep watch. The fact is the US Government openly considers a good portion of it's population right now as being terrorists, and just like how they were happy to try and entrap Richard Jewel and to stand around begging for Muslims to just please, please do some terrorism so much the mosque called the local police on the agent leading to a hilarious case of incompetence. The fact is that the "false flag" claim is no longer just a schizo excuse in the realm of hardcore conspiracy theorizing, it is slowly becoming a accepted tactic by the US Government and they have no qualms about using it. The same people who once professed a love of human rights and defense of freedom are now happy to throw us "racist mysognist far-right" under the bus and will gladly comply with the media spin.

Vigilance must be constant. Always doubt, especially if it looks too perfect to be real.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
This is the suspicious clip that made me create this thread and want to have a online record keeping of suspected glowies



Questions: Why would you openly advocate for violence on a TPUSA? What sort of person who wants violence would still care about TPUSA? Pretty much all the right wingers I know hate TPUSA. Charlie Kirk is seen by most people on the right as a complete trash grifter for barely taking a stand. He did nothing when Trump was trying to fight the election fraud but now he pretends he did. Why is this just "one guy" but the media will doxx the fuck out of people for much less?

This is what I mean by glowies not understanding their targets. This scenario only makes sense if you are a leftist or a complete normies disconnected from the realities of the current right wing views and positions in the USA. Someone who wants to grab guns and start shooting isn't gonna ask Charlie fucking Kirk about his opinion on it, they will just start stocking up for the boogaloo and make lists. Maybe, MAYBE, organize a local militia. Not this. This doesn't fit the M.O. at all. It glows.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Another very sus. I have always been suspicious of Patriot Front. They seem a bit too on the nose and sharp for a true outsider political org. And now this.

Why are they going to D.C.? What reason do they have to march into the hornets nest and give ammo to media? Is this publicity to get them more members, or a play to set up a sting and a good distractiom from Biden failures for the holidays with a Brown Scare?


 

Yinko

Well-known member
Another very sus. I have always been suspicious of Patriot Front. They seem a bit too on the nose and sharp for a true outsider political org. And now this.

Why are they going to D.C.? What reason do they have to march into the hornets nest and give ammo to media? Is this publicity to get them more members, or a play to set up a sting and a good distractiom from Biden failures for the holidays with a Brown Scare?



This reminds me of something Tim Pool said about Antifa, he was talking about hidden signs of organization and funding beyond "popular protests", one of them being the mass production of defensive props, like shields. Now, maybe Patriot Front is trying to look like a uniformed army, but even if that is the case, it would still be a challenge to make sure that every member had a shield that looked that similar unless they were all made by the same people.
That would take a small team of people a couple of days to make happen, depending on what they're made from and the complexity. Similarly, it's more likely that the uniform face masks were all bought by one person and then distributed, otherwise there would be small discrepancies in color and features.
I've never heard of this group before, and these things aren't sure signs that they're not what they seem, but it would certainly be easier to coordinate and pull-off for a government agency than for a group of friends.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
Another very sus. I have always been suspicious of Patriot Front. They seem a bit too on the nose and sharp for a true outsider political org. And now this.

Patriot Front emerged from the wreckage of Vanguard America after Charlottesville, with a lot of their senior figures being holdovers from VA; Thomas Rosseau is the obvious example of this. That gave Patriot Front a lot of experience organizationally and tactically from the 2015-2017 era of "Street Politics" on the Far Right, and they've had the four years since Charlottesville to learn the lesson from that and improve upon their tactics. Their "sharpness" comes from nearly a decade of experience at this point.

Why are they going to D.C.? What reason do they have to march into the hornets nest and give ammo to media? Is this publicity to get them more members, or a play to set up a sting and a good distractiom from Biden failures for the holidays with a Brown Scare?

Because it goes back to Charlottesville. Sines v Kessler just ended around Thanksgiving, and the expressed purpose of Roberta Kaplan was as follows:

It was a wild final day in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Norman Moon, who is overseeing a landmark civil trial over the deadly Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The lawsuit seeks millions in damages for nine plaintiffs injured during the rally. Attorneys for the plaintiffs say their goal is to financially cripple the defendants, a who’s who of the American racist right, and ensure nothing like Charlottesville ever happens again.
Marching into the literal belly of the beast that is D.C. sends a very clear message Kaplan and co utterly failed; the blow is all the more obvious given Thomas Rosseau was involved in Sines v Kessler as a witness. Washington is the heart of American political power, so being able to hold a successful rally with about as many men (500 this time, compared to ~600 for C-ville) just really drives the knife in. You're right about this being for membership, and explains why Patriot Front is increasingly prominent and being reported on, because they have had several successful demonstrations in 2020-2021. Several months ago they marched through the heart of Philadelphia, for example.

Now, to directly address the question of whether they are glowies, consider the following:

1. If this was a sting op to distract from Biden, how was it so? No fights or incidents like that involving James Fields occurred.
2. It is impossible to share Patriot Front links/websites on Facebook, Twitter, etc. About the only place you can is Telegram, which isn't saying much. If they were a Fed op, why would they limit their ability to do outreach?
3. Finally, for the last example, let's see how Antifa reacts to them:



If it is a Fed op, allowing their names to be put out there and getting them fired from their occupations seems an exceedingly poor way to run it, no?

As a general point, I think this thread is a good idea and I'm on record here as encouraging you all to exercise common sense and healthy skepticism because the Feds/Glowies/etc are out there and always working. I do think, however, that when your heuristic becomes "looking sharp" as defining a Fed, then you've crossed into paranoid schizo territory and you need to stop and consider what exactly that means for your politics/movement(s). The only entity that benefits from you being disorganized and not wanting to look sharp is the establishment you're concerned about. They'd much rather you stay at home bloviating on the web then getting out there, making connections and organizing politically. If you do start doing that, the key to being successful is being organized and thus "sharp" because no one is going to take you seriously if you look like a scrub.
 

Bassoe

Well-known member
Hey, glowies? I know you're here reading this and I've got an important message you're not irreplaceable. Keyword loggers to spy upon people, robodogs to kick down doors and shoot them. You're in the same boat as all of us, even if you don't realize it yet.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie

I am gonna be honest and say I didn't know that background, it explains the decision to march on D.C. very well and givea it legitimacy. I am also gonna admit I am not a expert and my research into Patriot Front was limited.

I am indeed a bit paranoid, but I am happy that I posted here because thanks to people like you I get a second opinion and more context. They might not be glowies after all, but better to be cautious.
 

AnimalNoodles

Well-known member
Another very sus. I have always been suspicious of Patriot Front. They seem a bit too on the nose and sharp for a true outsider political org. And now this.

Why are they going to D.C.? What reason do they have to march into the hornets nest and give ammo to media? Is this publicity to get them more members, or a play to set up a sting and a good distractiom from Biden failures for the holidays with a Brown Scare?




Patriot front actually learns from the mistakes of others. The ideal "Maga" rally has a bunch of obese men in tacticool shambling about aimlessly with no security, no attempt to hide thier identity and no direction chanting slogans and looking like idiots. Thats how the DC fiasco happened.

These guys apply basic fucking intelligence...they mask up and dress identically to make it harder to identify them, they have a plan worked out, (unarmed) shieldbearers for protection. They move in a group to their objective, do their thing, and leave. If they encounter significant resistance, they exit the area. They seem like glowies because normiecons are incapable of learning a damned thing and continuously make the same stupid mistakes. To the 'conservative' basic planning and organisation is something feds or antifa does. Real men act like retards, have no organisation, leadership, security and never apply lessons learned.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Patriot front actually learns from the mistakes of others. The ideal "Maga" rally has a bunch of obese men in tacticool shambling about aimlessly with no security, no attempt to hide thier identity and no direction chanting slogans and looking like idiots. Thats how the DC fiasco happened.
(...)
To the 'conservative' basic planning and organisation is something feds or antifa does. Real men act like retards, have no organisation, leadership, security and never apply lessons learned.

That highlighted part is sadly the crux of the issue. Truth is most of us don't feel like we should organize because that goes against the conserve part. The fact is a lot of people are in denial of how fucked the situation is.
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
That highlighted part is sadly the crux of the issue. Truth is most of us don't feel like we should organize because that goes against the conserve part. The fact is a lot of people are in denial of how fucked the situation is.

Does it really go against the conserve part? Or is that just a modern convention brought about by vehement insistence by uniparty hacks?

Conservative values didn't stop the religious right from organizing and funding terroristic insurgencies into Kansas nor did the lack of the franchise stop conservative women from egging on a war that killed six hundred thousand Americans.

It certainly didn't stop their political resurgence in the 1980s and 1990s.

What did stop them was a mix of using the cancel culture like tactics we see the modern left use pissing off the regular right wingers and controlled opposition amongst the GOP elite gassing them out by hijacking their movement.

Simply put- I don't know where this "organizing contradicts conserving" comes from because conservatives periodically bathed this country in blood and wielded some of the most destructive soft power in human history entirely because they organized specifically so they could promote their values and better conserve and spread the gospel.
 
Last edited:

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
I guess a better explanation of what I mean is that most of them are convinced that such organization can be dangerous. The fact is the uniparty propaganda worked in a way, and no one wants to accidentally create the new KKK. But thinking that is a certainty in case of organization is a big flaw we must overcome.

I just hope Patriot Front does well. They might not be glowie after all, but that doesn't mean there aren't other organizations like them that are. IIRC one of the big militias that had people on the 6th has a leader who is pretty much a FBI boot licker.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top