Middle East Running Iranian threat news and discussion thread

Reader mode
Husky_Khan

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
www.cyberscoop.com

Iranian hackers probed election-related websites in 10 states, US officials say

The briefing sheds more light on suspected Iranian efforts to potentially interfere in the U.S. presidential election.
www.cyberscoop.com www.cyberscoop.com

Iranian hacker attempts at influencing US elections detected in at least ten states with voter rolls compromised in at least one.

The hackers allegedly sent threatening emails identifying themselves as "The Proud Boys" and tried to threaten voters via email to vote for Trump and change their affiliation to the Republican party or else...

www.voanews.com

US Confirms Iran Hacked Voter Registration Data in 1 State

Officials describe the hack as part of broad Iranian campaign, warning that while Tuesday’s election remains safe, more attacks are coming
www.voanews.com www.voanews.com
 
V

Vaermina

Well-known member
Husky_Khan said:
www.cyberscoop.com

Iranian hackers probed election-related websites in 10 states, US officials say

The briefing sheds more light on suspected Iranian efforts to potentially interfere in the U.S. presidential election.
www.cyberscoop.com www.cyberscoop.com

Iranian hacker attempts at influencing US elections detected in at least ten states with voter rolls compromised in at least one.

The hackers allegedly sent threatening emails identifying themselves as "The Proud Boys" and tried to threaten voters via email to vote for Trump and change their affiliation to the Republican party or else...

www.voanews.com

US Confirms Iran Hacked Voter Registration Data in 1 State

Officials describe the hack as part of broad Iranian campaign, warning that while Tuesday’s election remains safe, more attacks are coming
www.voanews.com www.voanews.com
Click to expand...
They say it was to intimidate voters... But I doubt that... More likely it was to create a "hate" effect and drive people to vote for Biden because "Trump supporters evil".
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Have... have you never heard Cheney’s opinion, I don’t think there is a country in the Middle East he doesn’t want to invade.
Click to expand...
He's called Darth Cheney so I only know him from people's dislike of him and Bush is more visible.
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Ahh so the standard uniparty kabuki. He is a major Warhawk, think Bolton. The difference is trump kept Bolton on a leash due to caring about popularity with his base, that isn’t likely with Cheney.
Click to expand...
Maybe Bolton will also get invited too.
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Probably not, one is enough, and Bolton is way too recent, if he is invited even the twitter left who think Biden is their great white hope, would have to realize what actually happened.
Click to expand...
He can always make under the table deals and meetings but they just might think it's time to fuck with the Russians again.
 
Floridaman

Floridaman

Well-known member
Random Username said:
He can always make under the table deals and meetings but they just might think it's time to fuck with the Russians again.
Click to expand...
Not likely, during Bushes term Russia invaded Georgia, the US did nothing more than say a few strong words. During Obama’s terms he tried to reset relations complete with a hilariously sad prop. And then Russia invaded Crimea. The uniparty is easy to deal with because while they will happily fuck with the Middle East and other weaker powers, they regard the way of dealing with the major powers as a chess game, so proxies. Trump was the wild card, no one knew how he would react if Russia tried something like that, so they didn’t. For instance Solemani was a major change of direction.
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Not likely, during Bushes term Russia invaded Georgia, the US did nothing more than say a few strong words. During Obama’s terms he tried to reset relations complete with a hilariously sad prop. And then Russia invaded Crimea. The uniparty is easy to deal with because while they will happily fuck with the Middle East and other weaker powers, they regard the way of dealing with the major powers as a chess game, so proxies. Trump was the wild card, no one knew how he would react if Russia tried something like that, so they didn’t. For instance Solemani was a major change of direction.
Click to expand...
The Democrats were fucking with them trying to freedom Libya.
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Yes, a proxy conflict, not a direct one. We fight and aid one faction, they do the same, and no nukes fly. They invade a region directly, we help indirectly and vice versus.
Click to expand...
Which is why the Russians may as well get fucked with continuing the proxy conflict.
 
Floridaman

Floridaman

Well-known member
Random Username said:
Which is why the Russians may as well get fucked with continuing the proxy conflict.
Click to expand...
Why would they be? They know how to play that game very well, besides their public doesn’t care if they intervene directly, which limits what the US can do, since even the warhawks don’t want a nuclear war.
 
Arch Dornan

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Floridaman said:
Why would they be? They know how to play that game very well, besides their public doesn’t care if they intervene directly, which limits what the US can do, since even the warhawks don’t want a nuclear war.
Click to expand...
No no. I mean the US may continue a proxy conflict with the Russians.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 1, guests: 5)
Top