United States Predictions of a Biden Presidency
- Thread starter Yinko
- Start date
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
I think Identity Politics maybe less revered, but subtly more and more feared by then though
Kids maybe less and less into believing they’re “rebels” and they may REALLY want to skip school and avoid the weirdoes whom they think are too busy moralizing to actually have or be fun
ShieldWife
Marchioness
Back when Bush was in office, he was a Nazi and imperialist for the Iraq War, now if you’re anti-war you’re a traitor for Russia. Biden supported the Iraq War and he was there with Obama escalating the Syrian civil war, arming ISIS, and supporting the overthrow of Gaddafi. But as Democrats will tell us, we’ve always been at war with Oceania.
And then they complain they never supported it. Down the memory hole it goes, and you are crazy if you ever bring this up.
That sadly works for a time and then eventally you lose all credibility and people either throw you out of power, ignore you or if you wont let go of power you get overthrown.
One can only hope.
Also I got a prediction for the Biden presidency, it abruptly ends when he turns out to be an evil reptile from outer space that devours kittens for sustenance, and then he flees in his silver chrome ufo, and somewhere in Ontario, an ex-premier feels a sudden chill.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
He just needs to say more lock downs.
Probably.
Anyways, I wonder if I should have even made that joke prediction, because it is based on dank Canadian election memes.
Exactly. Obama is almost a conservative compared to the leftism Biden preached during his campaign, and he governed far to the right of Kamala Harris...who we all know will be running the puppet show.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
Thing about Obama is that while he tacitly backed social liberalism-witness his “evolution” on gay marriage(I personally believe he always supported it but only said he didn’t when the political winds had not shifted in its favor yet), he also governed fairly standardly otherwise. He golfed with Wall Street bankers, had insurance company lobbyists help work on Obamacare, and conducted drone wars.
Obama’s “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon” and his apology tour, among other things were really where his leftism came in.
Thing is, the Democratic Party has changed, it is far. more radical and its base wants far more. Except for the anti war contingent which are Russian agents now. Because we can’t have anyone oppose the American empire, that would be bad.
Obama’s “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon” and his apology tour, among other things were really where his leftism came in.
Thing is, the Democratic Party has changed, it is far. more radical and its base wants far more. Except for the anti war contingent which are Russian agents now. Because we can’t have anyone oppose the American empire, that would be bad.
Last edited by a moderator:
History Learner
Well-known member
Yes, actually. Starting in the 1970s the PLO began to signal it would accept the Two State Solution and by 1988 Yasser Arafat would formally declare their adherence to such a proposal.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
Trump’s policy was really that the Palestinians had pretty much lost and so he sought a peace treaty that didn’t pretend they were equal with Israel in any sort of power dynamic.
It was a recognition of the situation on the ground, that is Israel has nearly broken them.
Obviously if your pro Palestinian or an anti Zionist of any kind, your going to prefer the previous policy.
Trump’s policy more simply was “Israel has the upper hand, I recognize they have the upper hand, you can either negotiate from this position of defeat or Israel can crush you completely”.
Seventy years of US diplomacy has obviously failed. Trump decided to instead back the side that was winning.
It was a recognition of the situation on the ground, that is Israel has nearly broken them.
Obviously if your pro Palestinian or an anti Zionist of any kind, your going to prefer the previous policy.
Trump’s policy more simply was “Israel has the upper hand, I recognize they have the upper hand, you can either negotiate from this position of defeat or Israel can crush you completely”.
Seventy years of US diplomacy has obviously failed. Trump decided to instead back the side that was winning.
History Learner
Well-known member
You don't have to raise taxes because the Federal Government currently offers $57,500 total in maximum federal student loans; in other words, if you have said debt, the Federal Government is already in debt too because of it. To get an idea of what I mean, if you took $50,000 in debt to get a Bachelor's Degree from 2016-2020, the Federal Government is already in debt for that amount because the borrower has yet to pay them back. Such a cancellation would be the Government forgoing repayment for existing debt, not issuing new amounts of it.
As for the minimum wage, the CBO looked at it and found it would, in an absolute worst case cause 1.3 Million job cuts. That certainly sounds bad but, it would also boost the living standards of 17 Million people. Right now is the perfect time to do this because the taxation levels on businesses are low and once the economy starts to heat up again, we will return to the situation we had before of having too many job openings but not enough workers. By boosting the purchasing power of 17 Million people, that would encourage more consumption and thus more production, meaning more jobs too.
Ah, they started to "signal", sure. That would have been hilarious, if it didn't cost a thousand of Israeli lives in the Second Intifada. The Palestinian agenda has never changed, it's sad that the west and people like you keep falling for their propaganda.
History Learner
Well-known member
They started to signal in the 1970s, they outright declared it in 1988 and in following agreements starting from them:
PLO under Yasser Arafat agrees to consider a solution focused on Palestinian claims to the West Bank and Gaza, not all of historic Palestine; Jordan gives up its claims to the West Bank to the PLO
If we're talking about the Second Intifada, to which are you referring? Because to bring those up as some sort of assertion that the Palestinians are planning genocide leaves out a LOT of context there.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
GoldRanger is an Israeli, so no disrespect to him, he does have a rather large stake in this debate.
Hopefully, this.
Oh wow, they outright declared it then. Truly impressive, those peace loving Palestinians are!
Arafat's speech in a Johannesburg mosque in 1994, half a year after signing the Oslo accords and getting the Nobel Peace Prize for it:
Bu-bu-bu-but that's illegal! They declared!
If this context is Ariel Sharon's visit to the temple mount, a region that is holy to both religions, then that's not really any relevant context, but rather an excuse. The Second Intifada was pre-planned and was just waiting for a trigger.
Last edited:
ShieldWife
Marchioness
Hopefully, this.
You know, I just can't. Biden is a scumbag to be sure. Biden is not Adolf Hitler.
Now, some of his supporters (like Antifa and BLM) sure seem to act like Brown Shirts, though I think that a better comparison might be the Red Guards under Mao.
Though, ultimately, the right doesn't even have the option of misbehaving as much under Biden (in the terrible but likely event he wins) as the left did under Trump because we don't control the media, we don't control the nation's powerful institutions. When right wingers beat up people in the streets they go to prison for years instead of having charges dropped. The right can't smear Biden with nearly every media outlet, can't have social media censor Biden supporters, can't trump up charges against him to terrorize his allies and distract him from his agenda.