Ok let me translate Life's argument into economic terms.
Relationships, are like any kind of transaction there are costs and benifits.
In this case there is a demand for relationships with women and a supply of women who want to be in relationships.
In economics Price ceilings create excess demand and price floors create a surplus, what our current way of doing things does is create a price floor.
Lets take welfare, for a single mother they can get up to close to 17,000 dollars in benefits in missippi the least generous state and up to 49,000 In Hawaii. The average that gets brought up is around 35,000 dollars. That's what you as a man have to make to beat uncle Sam.
However for a man it gets worse.
If a woman divorces you she gets child support, and maybe Alimony on top of that welfare she also at minimum gets half your stuff, and chances are gets the home. By the way Child support and Alimony often dont count for purposes of welfare. Lets say you make the median wage 50,000 a month.
She gets half 25,000 a month +35,000 a month thats 60,000 dollars a month in benifits and child support. Uncle Sam is now officially giving her a better life then most people to destroy your marrage. But the price floor gets worse most men lose the maritable home dispite often paying more or all of the money into it.
The price of an average home is over 200,000 dollars.
That makes the price floor even worse.
The result of this price floor is going to be lonely cat ladies and the worse it gets the more of a surplus will be created. Lifes central argument is make the price floor less shitty and more men will get married and have families.