Meme Thread for Both Posting and Discussing Memes
- Thread starter Captain X
- Start date
Both the strong woman and disney skits shows that South Park writers get close to the right idea, but inevitably will stop short in an effort to pull both-siderism. Honestly, that might be a strength, because it lets them keep the fence-sitter audience who get to feel clever and subversive.
Like, after Macho Man Randy Savage wrecks the women in physical sports, the women eventually win by switching to nonphysical competitive games. That would never work in real life since men dominate exactly as hard in nonphysical sports as physical ones, and transgenders have also begun to completely drive out actual women from the top ranks. For instance, is there even a single high ranked competitive "woman" esports player who's not actually a man?
Isn't it an often observed fact that a lot of lesbians, usually the more feminine, are lesbians due to bad experience with men, causing them to go towards females as they often feel.more secure.
The females they often go after are more masculine and are often the ones who do DV.
The females they often go after are more masculine and are often the ones who do DV.
DarthOne
☦️
No idea, but it would not surprise me. It certainly fits together in a sort of logic.
mrttao
Well-known member
How many of those "lesbians" are men in a dress?
Wargamer08
Well-known member
It's not that at all. In a straight relationship almost any level of violent from the woman towards the man is not considered to be DV and is massively underreported.
Basically lesbian DV is reported to be more prevalent because there is no bias with both sides being the same sex.
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
These percentages precede the men are women paradigm, it's simply women being shitty to women (huge surprise here).
Simonbob
Well-known member
Nope.
Gays are vastly less likely to do DV, too, and those guys are very often seriously unmanly.
Infact, the lowest levels of DV? Gay guys. By far. Like, 9 times less than straight couples, who are 17 times less likely than the lesbians.
DarthOne
☦️
Funny how that works. It’s almost as if our ancestors had a reason for looking down on homosexuality.
Poe
Well-known member
Because they're less likely to beat each other up?
mrttao
Well-known member
I am well aware of that.
Lesbian domestic violence incidents are far far higher than any other gender combination. Comes with women being women.
And in straight couples, the vast majority of domestic violence is woman violence towards men.
A gay man is less likely to be beaten by their partner than a straight man is likely to be beaten by a straight woman.
And 30 years ago lesbian on lesbian domestic violence would have been just that (women being violent).
I am not trying to dismiss it.
I am just noting that now in 2023 they are also rolling in the "man in a wig on woman" violence into the same statistic which means modern statistics are more misleading than those from 30 years ago.
Trannies are mentally ill and are the most violent demographic in the LGBTQP alliance.
Quick searches shows various alarmist articles denoting that lesbian domestic violence is "higher than ever" now. Although finding historical data is difficult. and there is a lot of attempts at whitewashing.
Also dear fucking god... wokepedia... article on the subject is just cringe. They attribute it to "internalized homophobia"
Last edited:
My issue with them calling it internalized homophobia is it is usually tje more masculine female that is abusive
I think he meant the lesbians being far more likely to beat each other up.
But in the ancient world, your tribe only continued to exist due to the exercise of its ability to defend itself against other tribes. Lose the wrong war, and your little nation is erased from existence, all your men killed, all your women taken as slave-wives by the men of the conquering tribe.
Which means you do not want any man in your tribe to be a soft, effeminate gayboy who will panic and run rather than stand and hold the shieldline with the rest.
While if you were the leader of the rival tribe on the other side of the river, it might serve your purposes to covertly encourage unmanliness among the people whose land you were planning to conquer.
Men learn from a real young age that violence has conquences.
Societies for the most part learn real fast that having a lot of men who cant control themselves leads to really bad shit, even in our current society as ill as it is for reasons of self preservation this is the case. Women are unfortunatly coddled and don't get those lessons growing up because too many people assume women are more virtuous by default.
This is not the case, when you don't learn self control and get into a relationship its going to blow up in your face.
when they had to they still fought.
They may not have fought well but the number of peasant levies through out history is huge.
I mean yeah, they fought out if survival or force, not out if being trained and capable
mrttao
Well-known member
They didn't know how to fight. But still had to fight when their lord called them to war.