Meme Thread for Both Posting and Discussing Memes
- Thread starter Captain X
- Start date
Different heads of the same monster.
SoliFortissimi
Well-known member
I mean, there are significantly more single young males than females. And almost all research tells that single women are richer and happier than their counterparts.
So this meme is basically copium.
Which is the exact opposite of reality and the research I've seen.
Married women with families are markedly happier than their single counterparts.
SoliFortissimi
Well-known member
Multiple teams of scientists vs "trust me, bro". What a dilemma.
Then you should have no problem providing citations for your claim then
I'll start.
Morphic Tide
Well-known member
SoliFortissimi
Well-known member
Women are happier without children or a spouse, says happiness expert
Behavioural scientist Paul Dolan says traditional markers of success no longer apply
www.theguardian.com
4 Reasons Why Single Women Are The Happiest People On Earth—By A Psychologist
Singlehood is treating women far more kindly than men. Here’s why, according to psychological research, single women are so much happier to be alone.
www.forbes.com
Loading…
www.researchgate.net
Circle of Willis
Well-known member
SoliFortissimi
Well-known member
LMAO, the definition of a biased source.
Skitzyfrenic
Well-known member
Hmmmm. This argument looks mighty familiar.
In fact, that article looks very familiar.
Used it before.
Still weak and from a very biased source.
Still falls apart when shown these posts. Which have quite a lot more information backed by papers, showing domestic violence by women, as well as general happiness in the original argument of 'feminism has made things shit for women.'
Soli completely missed the point that domestic abuse is a sign of unhappiness and dismissed all of the points, but couldn't refute a single one with anything other than dismissal then.
Let me quote one part in particular.
As this also links to the paper that supports the article and the table @The Whispering Monk and linked to by @Morphic Tide
I will also bring up specifically:
Again as it is a video with a very complete bibliography of official studies to include governmental ones.
Soli will, of course, dismiss this again, because all Soli does in troll and engage in bad faith.
Married people are happier than non-married people, people with children are happier than people without children, married people with children are the happiest. This is across a number of studies (which are in previous posts linked in this post) and easy to find from unbiased sources.
Just like it's easy to find horribly biased sources like the Observer or Forbes and hold it as gospel.
And... a paper done with only 40 people? Wow that such a good seed size for statistical analysis. That was sarcastic, by the way. Props for finding it at least.
Thank god it's from such an applicable place. SEA is so progressive and advanced with an incredibly high quality of life. More sarcasm, for your information.
And the difference is so small. 120.2 vs 121.45. How many of the single women were younger? Just because the idunno... two single women over 30 said they were strongly happy doesn't mean shit if we don't know how many of them exist, but it certainly leads you to believe something that isn't necessarily true by drawing attention to it. What was the average age of each category. This is so bare bones. There's an age range of 25-40, but single women happiness based on age seems to nose dive once they hit 30 and can't find boyfriends or flings anymore (see the plethora of articles bitching about being 30+ and how men won't date them anymore).
SD means Standard Deviation? Looks like the average might be higher for single women, but more married women are happier given their SD is smaller (so more of them are clustered around the average)
And the range bands show that the single women can be more miserable than the married women, just as they can be happier.
Oh, it's not just married women. It's 'married housewives' vs 'single career women.'
It also only talks about the things that make single women happy and no mention of children.
There also seems to be a table missing.
'The results of this survey' fuck you mean? You asked only 40 women questions, and gathered information on what seems to literally be only one relevant question beyond marital status, age, and occupation.
That very much sounds to me like more married women are actually happier, even if the average level of happiness is higher for single women.
This is a dogshit study that spends more time referencing other studies than it does proving anything on its own.
After putting in some good faith effort, this paper is dismissed as insufficient evidence.
In fact, that article looks very familiar.
Women are happier without children or a spouse, says happiness expert
Behavioural scientist Paul Dolan says traditional markers of success no longer apply
How does that make our life hell?
Hope you've got a source for that?
Used it before.
Still weak and from a very biased source.
Still falls apart when shown these posts. Which have quite a lot more information backed by papers, showing domestic violence by women, as well as general happiness in the original argument of 'feminism has made things shit for women.'
Soli completely missed the point that domestic abuse is a sign of unhappiness and dismissed all of the points, but couldn't refute a single one with anything other than dismissal then.
Let me quote one part in particular.
As this also links to the paper that supports the article and the table @The Whispering Monk and linked to by @Morphic Tide
I will also bring up specifically:
Again as it is a video with a very complete bibliography of official studies to include governmental ones.
Soli will, of course, dismiss this again, because all Soli does in troll and engage in bad faith.
Married people are happier than non-married people, people with children are happier than people without children, married people with children are the happiest. This is across a number of studies (which are in previous posts linked in this post) and easy to find from unbiased sources.
Just like it's easy to find horribly biased sources like the Observer or Forbes and hold it as gospel.
And... a paper done with only 40 people? Wow that such a good seed size for statistical analysis. That was sarcastic, by the way. Props for finding it at least.
Thank god it's from such an applicable place. SEA is so progressive and advanced with an incredibly high quality of life. More sarcasm, for your information.
And the difference is so small. 120.2 vs 121.45. How many of the single women were younger? Just because the idunno... two single women over 30 said they were strongly happy doesn't mean shit if we don't know how many of them exist, but it certainly leads you to believe something that isn't necessarily true by drawing attention to it. What was the average age of each category. This is so bare bones. There's an age range of 25-40, but single women happiness based on age seems to nose dive once they hit 30 and can't find boyfriends or flings anymore (see the plethora of articles bitching about being 30+ and how men won't date them anymore).
SD means Standard Deviation? Looks like the average might be higher for single women, but more married women are happier given their SD is smaller (so more of them are clustered around the average)
And the range bands show that the single women can be more miserable than the married women, just as they can be happier.
Oh, it's not just married women. It's 'married housewives' vs 'single career women.'
It also only talks about the things that make single women happy and no mention of children.
There also seems to be a table missing.
'The results of this survey' fuck you mean? You asked only 40 women questions, and gathered information on what seems to literally be only one relevant question beyond marital status, age, and occupation.
That very much sounds to me like more married women are actually happier, even if the average level of happiness is higher for single women.
This is a dogshit study that spends more time referencing other studies than it does proving anything on its own.
After putting in some good faith effort, this paper is dismissed as insufficient evidence.
As always @Skitzyfrenic I appreciate your work carrying water. I don't have the time respond like this as I'm in the office during the day.
Skitzyfrenic
Well-known member
I might not manage it every time. But this time, for this post. I gotchu.
Why femurs? and why 37?
Besides,there is no enough place in his tummy for that.