Meme Thread for Both Posting and Discussing Memes

[LordsFire]

You seem to have forgotten your own post. The post you quoted is replying to

which is a tangent where you expanded and generalized away from discussing ben shapiro to instead discussing the trust of ANYONE who is in the public eye, in particularly those who are part of the "political process".
This is clearly stating that we should just trust politicians. Therefore I replied to you about those who hold political office rather than ben shapiro specifically.

Saying "ben shapiro does not hold political office" is pivoting back to the original argument about ben shapiro. But we were discussing this tangent on whether or not public officials can be trusted.

As for Ben shapiro himself. He is an influencer. His job is making money off of people tuning in to what he has to say in public about politics.
In this regard he is more of a televangelist than a politician. But he televangelizes about political subjects even if he does not run for office.

I'm not sure if you're misunderstanding or mischaracterizing my argument.

We were talking about Ben Shapiro.

You said you didn't trust what is seen of him, due to incentives to present a false persona in his field of work.

I said distrusting someone just for being in the public eye was dysfunctionally cynical, and I specifically used 'in the public eye' as a broad term, because it covers a lot of bases.

Your argument against this specifically cited how politicians make promises, then fail to keep those promises.

I pointed out that the habits of politicians have no direct bearing on Ben Shapiro, because he is not a politician, but a media commentator/media company owner. While politicians certainly are in the public eye, they are not the same thing as media commentators, and do not have the same incentives.

Your response to this is... something about semantics of what terms have and have not been used?

What is your argument here?

 

[Scottty]

 

[Scottty]

 

[DarthOne]

Pictured:
Western Civilization in the near future

 

[Scottty]

 

[DarthOne]

 

[Scottty]

 

[DarthOne]

Based Poland @ATP

 

[Cherico]

there were women slave owners even in the colonial era and in many cases female owners of slaves could be horrifically bad to their slaves.

Seriously shit got real fucking bad, and women slave owners were no better then the men and in some cases much worse.

 

[mrttao]

there were women slave owners even in the colonial era and in many cases female owners of slaves could be horrifically bad to their slaves.

Seriously shit got real fucking bad, and women slave owners were no better then the men and in some cases much worse.

fun story, the very first true slave owner in USA was a black man.
a black man who was an indentured servant sued his black former owner.
saying that his indenture term expired and thus he should be let free, he is being kept in bondage is against the law (which is true).

the black owner argued that he just doesn't wanna let him go. he wants a slave.
judge ruled in favor of owner. starting slavery in the usa.
I gotta wonder why the judge ruled that.

but yea, females are very capable of cruelty.

 

[Scottty]

there were women slave owners even in the colonial era and in many cases female owners of slaves could be horrifically bad to their slaves.

Seriously shit got real fucking bad, and women slave owners were no better then the men and in some cases much worse.

The point is that the purple-background-girl is oblivious to the moral question that the yellow-panel man is raising, and which red and blue are responding to.
All she cares about is her precious "representation".

 

[Circle of Willis]

 

[Scottty]

 

[Scottty]

 

[ATP]

Winged hussarl armour do not looked like that.And,wings was connected to saddles of their horses,they ctart connecting it to armour in 18th century when they become formation used mostly during funerals of important persons.

And,sadly,we have our own degenerates,and bigger cities like Warsaw are ruled by them.

 

[Husky_Khan]

Top Ten Anti-Communist Memes according to some Fascist Meme Account called 'Declaration of Memes/@LibertyCappy.'

 

[TheRejectionist]

Pictured:
Western Civilization in the near future

Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if someone (common folk and maybe those few honest politicos lefts) are already having this reaction as we speak.

 

[DarthOne]

 

[TheRejectionist]

What is happening here?

Who cares if Ben is real or faking his faith?

I'd lean more towards it being genuine but in the end it's a personal thing for each person.

Why are people arguing about it?

And to be clear, yeah politicians are shit at it. Oh, lots of prominent dems are catholic. While spitting in the face of catholic beliefs and traditions and supporting blasphemy. Yeah, Ok. Whatever.

That guy is likely genuine only on his faith.

The rest is up to debate.

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Lets see if this applies.