Leftist Child Grooming

[Bacle]

I have too many faggot relatives to want you all dead.
You are projecting your own murderous intents on me.

No, I'm responding to the thinly disguised murderous intent that Darth expressed towards all non-hetero's, and your white-knighting for him.

1. you are assume everyone is as bloodthristy as you are (who wants to mass murder children)

You are the one who tried to play a stupid gotcha with the shit about the 'Russian kids', specifically manipulating and lying about the context of that argument (not for the first time, since you love to simp for Putin sempai).

2. you are panicking and lashing out. such that if anyone dares to suggest your future prediction (business as usual for the LGB) are wrong, then it is only because he fantasizes on killing you.

He literally said:
'It won't save them.'

Don't play these bullshit games, I'm not someone who is going to let you get away with it.

Sorry if I don't take the 'It doesn't matter what any non-hetero does to fight against the groomers or pedo's, we need to purge them all' type shit lightly or want to let someone who is whiteknighting for it play fuck-fuck games on this.

You want to mass execute children. That is not "foreign policy" you psycho.

And here you go again with mischaracterizing that argument, and trying to divert the topic away from Darth's excess and desire for purging non-hetero's.

Is Putin sempai giving you a pat on the head every time you try to use that as an argument against me?

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

No, I'm responding to the thinly disguised murderous intent that Darth expressed towards all non-hetero's, and your white-knighting for him.

He literally said:
'It won't save them.'

yeah, as rare as it is this is one of the few times I agree with Bacle, whether it's the case or not there does seem to be quite a few people on the board who are essentially waiting for a figurehead or an authority figure to give them permission to cause trouble like anifa or BLM will they actually do it if the opportunity arises who knows but it seems like it's wanted and in the case that occurs why SHOULDIN'T people like Bacle and Abhorsen and those close to them against the right winged trouble makers to defend themselves? If this is the left I think we'd all be singing a different tune.

to put bluntly I'm concerned. I've tried encouraging people I've tried giving them motivational speeches, I've tried giving words of prayer and comfort and trust in the Lord. yet I've seen a steady trend of people starting to spiral out of control. I know I've made my share of comments of "I don't want to be on this planet anymore" or "Why are we still here? Just to suffer." but I am legit concerned about the mental health of some of the people here.

Edit: in my four years here I've watched people stare deeper and deeper into the abyss in real-time until they succumbed went overboard and then got banned.

 

[DarthOne]

While DarthOne is being highly excessive, he does have a point that there are limits to how much cooperation there can be between Christians and homosexuals.

Not really. I’m hardly in the ‘lobotomies/executions for everyone’ camp. Especially not the lobotomies camp. That’s just all sorts of horrific.

Simply put, the Bible has condemned homosexuality as sinful and Christians cannot change or reject any part of the Bible no matter the circumstances. This leaves little room for compromise.

The vast majority of western Christians are willing to tolerate homosexuals. No orthodox ones are willing to approve of them.

Correct. I myself was on the ‘tolerant’ side of things. The past two-three years or so have pretty throughly sunk such notions.

Unfortunately gays, or at least the public ones, aren't pushing for toleration, they are pushing for validation. If they just wanted to be left alone then there would be little problem.

But they have not been doing that. For decades gays have been demanding that society actively celebrate them. Instead of tolerating Christians as long as they are tolerated in turn, homosexuals have called all those who disapproved of them bigots.

They are demanding what cannot be given because Christians believe that to do so will result in literal damnation.

The vast majority of the Christian right is not looking to throw gays off rooftops or lobotomize them with the exception of a few fringe elements. But they do disapprove of the practice and usually dislike those who engage in it. But people can live with being disliked. Cooperation is possible between people who dislike one another.

Gays will never be approved of by Christians. But hopefully in time they will settle for toleration. Because anything more is impossible.

We’re pretty much past the point of toleration. It’s been abundantly clear that the LGBTQ crowd will not tolerate Christianity, not unless they can turn it into a sock puppet for their ideology. Furthermore, history has shown that every time the LGBTQ crowd has been ‘tolerated’ it never stays that way and all that comes from it is rot, corruption and decay.

So I say no more. And there’s simply no way we can trust the LGBTQ community not to stick a knife in our backs after the Revolution.

All the leadership and prominent figures would need to be dealt with. Exile would just let them spread their poison elsewhere and from elsewhere. Since the vast majority are on the left, this would fit with the de-left-wingification of the USA and the West post-war. Nevermind that the majority of them live in cities, which would likely suffer greatly during such a conflict. So one would imagine that the problem would take care of itself somewhat. The vast majority of the LGBTQ individuals, including those on the right, would be forced to live under the new laws and rules.

Known individuals would be defined any teaching or educational jobs. Perhaps it would be best to come up with some sort of test or system to make sure it says that way. As we’ve seen what happens when they and their supporters do when given access to children- they groom them or worse. A read through this very thread confirms that simple truth.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.


Edit: clarification of some of my views.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

We’re pretty much past the point of toleration. Every damn time throughout history we’ve tolerated these scum, all it’s done is lead to rot, corruption and decay. No more.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

Darth Stop! You keep going dwelling deeper and deeper into this mindset you're eventually going to decide to do something that is going to get yourself hurt or worse! Is that what you want?!?

 

[DarthOne]

Darth Stop! You keep going dwelling deeper and deeper into this mindset you're eventually going to decide to do something that is going to get yourself hurt or worse! Is that what you want?!?

I’m not stupid enough to go shoot up a pride parade or something. It would be illogical and counterproductive. As it would give the LGBTQ cult and its left wing supporters more propaganda and martyrs for their cult.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

I’m not stupid enough to go shoot up a pride parade or something. It would be illogical and counterproductive. As it would give the LGBTQ cult and its left wing supporters more propaganda and martyrs for their cult.

The fact that you seem to be advocating for someone else to do it is bad enough and I'm not talking about how it look I'm talking about your mental wellbeing. I mean dude look at these comments you've made just in this thread alone.

Then let it be done, if God wills it.

I want to be part of whatever brings them down and live long enough to see the victory.

We're pretty much past the point of toleration. Every damn time throughout history we've tolerated these scum, all it's done is lead to rot, corruption and decay. No more. And there's simply no way we can trust the LGBTQ community not to stick a knife in our backs after the Revolution.

All the leadership and prominent figures would need to be dealt with. Exile would just let them spread their poison elsewhere and from elsewhere. Since the vast majority are on the left, this would fit with the de-left-wingification of the USA and the West post-war. Nevermind that the majority of them live in cities, which would likely suffer greatly during such a conflict. So one would imagine that the problem would take care of itself somewhat. The vast majority of the LGBTQ individuals, including those on the right, would be forced to live under the new laws and rules.

Known individuals would be defined any teaching or educational jobs. Perhaps it would be best to come up with some sort of test or system to make sure it says that way.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

 

[DarthOne]

The fact that you seem to be advocating for someone else to do it is bad enough and I'm not talking about how it look I'm talking about your mental wellbeing. I mean dude look at these comments you've made just in this thread alone.

On the contrary, someone else doing it would be just as bad. Now.

When the time comes, when the coming conflict comes or during its aftermath, that is when action will be taken. Not before.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

When the time comes, when the coming conflict comes or during its aftermath, that is when action will be taken. Not before.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

dude...listen to yourself.

You read like you're two steps away from writing a manifesto. You were not like this a few years ago, heck you weren't even like this a year ago.

 

[DarthOne]

dude...listen to yourself.

You read like you're two steps away from writing a manifesto. You were not like this a few years ago, heck you weren't even like this a year ago.

Maybe I should. Someone has to.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

 

[Cherico]

dude...listen to yourself.

You read like you're two steps away from writing a manifesto. You were not like this a few years ago, heck you weren't even like this a year ago.

We have all had a very very bad time these last few years.

 

[strunkenwhite]

Foreign policy and warfare are not the same as US Constitutional and civil rights, and context matters.

The Russian Federation has no rights or claim to the US or to trying to claim moral control over the US.

I also argued the Russians outside Russia should be treated as the enemies in place they are, if they are not against Putin, regardless of age.

... this is not the answer I was hoping for when the accusation against you was, "You are the one who argues that any russian child who is not ACTIVELY anti putin should be shot."

Could you give a straight answer to that accusation for me? I agree it's a red herring for the purpose of the discussion you were having. But it's a HELL of a red herring.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

Maybe I should. Someone has to.

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

Good lord man just...you need a break from politics and the internet and you need help. Help those of us on the internet can't provide. Please for your own well being...get off the virtual box, go outside talk with family read your bible. Just please stay away from politics.

 

[mrttao]

... this is not the answer I was hoping for when the accusation against you was, "You are the one who argues that any russian child who is not ACTIVELY anti putin should be shot."

Could you give a straight answer to that accusation for me? I agree it's a red herring for the purpose of the discussion you were having. But it's a HELL of a red herring.

Dude, literally read the last line you quoted.
He very explicitly says "treated as enemies... regardless of age".
He is doubling down on his position that all russian children should be shot unless they are actively anti putin.

The only thing he ever backed down on since his very first original post on the subject was the location.
He now says he only wants to shoot russian children outside the borders of russia. That is, in USA and europe and other countries that are not russia.
so that makes it ok in his mind. its just "foreign policy and warfare" he says

This is why he keeps on accusing people of wanting him dead. because he is projecting.

also, now I recall he also previously said he wanted me and everyone else on this forum who disagrees with his anti russia PR or disagrees on giving unlimited funding to ukraine, to be executed for treason as a "5th column russian agent" (I am not).

 

[strunkenwhite]

Dude, literally read the last line you quoted.
He very explicitly says "treated as enemies... regardless of age".
He is doubling down on his position that all russian children should be shot.
The only thing he ever backed down on since his very first original post was the location.
He now says he only wants to shoot russian children outside the borders of russia. so that makes it ok in his mind. its just "foreign policy and warfare" he says

I want to hear him either own up to it or back down from it. I don't know that "treat them as enemies" necessarily means "shoot them all" but it's certainly not out of the question.

And, for a counterexample, having internment camps like FDR did to Japanese-Americans in WWII (for Russian children) is not exactly what I would call a reasonable reaction.

 

[DarthOne]

I want to hear him either own up to it or back down from it. I don't know that "treat them as enemies" necessarily means "shoot them all" but it's certainly not out of the question.

And, for a counterexample, having internment camps like FDR did to Japanese-Americans in WWII (for Russian children) is not exactly what I would call a reasonable reaction.

Indeed. And he thinks I’m a fanatic.

Mind you I’m not entirely surprised that he reacted this way. At least in terms of the ‘muh Russia’ and ‘Your a Putin fan’ accusations.


In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

 

[DarthOne]

Good lord man just...you need a break from politics and the internet and you need help. Help those of us on the internet can't provide. Please for your own well being...get off the virtual box, go outside talk with family read your bible. Just please stay away from politics.

First thing in my daily reading today, no joke.

Isaiah 13:2-13
On a bare hill raise a signal, cry aloud to them; wave the hand for them to enter the gates of the nobles. I myself have commanded my consecrated ones, have summoned my mighty men to execute my anger, my proudly exulting ones.

Hark, a tumult on the mountains as of a great multitude! Hark, an uproar of kingdoms, of nations gathering together! The LORD of hosts is mustering a host for battle. They come from a distant land, from the end of the heavens, the LORD and the weapons of his indignation, to destroy the whole earth.

Wail, for the day of the LORD is near; as destruction from the Almighty it will come! Therefore all hands will be feeble, and every man's heart will melt, and they will be dismayed. Pangs and agony will seize them; they will be in anguish like a woman in travail. They will look aghast at one another; their faces will be aflame.

Behold, the day of the LORD comes, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger, to make the earth a desolation and to destroy its sinners from it. For the stars of the heavens and their constellations will not give their light; the sun will be dark at its rising and the moon will not shed its light. I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; I will put an end to the pride of the arrogant, and lay low the haughtiness of the ruthless. I will make men more rare than fine gold, and mankind than the gold of Ophir. Therefore I will make the heavens tremble, and the earth will be shaken out of its place, at the wrath of the LORD of hosts in the day of his fierce anger.

The second was Genesis 8:4-21, talking about the aftermath of the Great Flood. The third is Proverbs 10:31-11:12. Which beings thus:

The mouth of the righteous brings forth wisdom, but the perverse tongue will be cut off. The lips of the righteous know what is acceptable, but the mouth of the wicked, what is perverse. A false balance is an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is his delight. When pride comes, then comes disgrace; but with the humble is wisdom. The integrity of the upright guides them, but the crookedness of the treacherous destroys them.

Edit:

In all polities within this Overton Window, "conservative" just means "Liberalism according to which decade I prefer". To be truly Conservative would be best described as Traditionalist or Reactionary.

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

Its weird when the anti-pedophile bill showed up in America, and LGBTP+ people worldwide threw a hissyfit for some odd reason.

Now why would they be doing that...

 

[Jormungandr]

Actually it will, because most of society doesn't have beef with the LGB's these days, mostly just the T's and their groomers.

LGB are sexual orientations, T's are severely mentally ill, and most of society understands this nuance.

It's only fringe fuckheads like you who think forcing LGB's back into the closet, or hitting them with the T's, is at all viable.

Most people don't have issues with regular people who happen to be gay, Bi, or a lesbian than straight/hetero. I don't.

Unfortunately, it seems that most people who are gay, Bi, or a lesbian, through either their own choices or because they buy into the Rainbow Tumour culture that's being perpetuated in society and media, aren't these people anymore: They make their sexual identity their entire personality, become intolerant when people rightfully call such stupidity out (for example, I'm straight, but do I make being straight my entire personality? Do you?), inject sexuality and fetishes into work (see Russell T. Davies, Chuti Gatwa as examples), and they go batshit insane and use buzzwords such as "homophobia" and "intolerance" even when other people are indifferent that they're not straight.

The trans-trender crowd is even worse for reasons I don't need to go into.

There are many reason why people say that the slippery slope exists, and we've seen gays, Bis, and lesbians take a swan dive down that slope in the last ten, twenty years. We're seeing the damage done to society in real-time.

Again, most people these days don't care if someone's a regular person but gay, Bi, or lesbian, but it seems like they're now becoming or have always been outliers.

If the choices are basically "keep that shit at home or between friends, no one cares, keep them equal in law" (meaning no parades, no Pride Months, no celebrations or grandstanding events such as painting sidewalks, politics where politics shouldn't be e.g. media will get you fired, et cetera) and "ban everything gay, Bi, or lesbian because they'll inevitably progress to openly want to fuck children, persecute other people for not celebrating they want dicks and tacos instead of tacos and dicks, fuck each other openly and cry persecution when they're arrested for public indecency", then the former is the best option because the latter will always happen in time.

And, no, I don't say this from a religious standpoint like other people on here have stated in the past. I say this from a common-sense/look at history angle.

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

I think at this point almost everyone on the planet knows at least one gay person they're perfectly fine interacting with.

But for that matter I am pretty certain I've met fucking Emus which I wouldn't mind walking around, doesn't stop the fact a lot of them will probably try kicking or pecking my eyes out.

You can always judge individuals as individuals, but it's impossibly foolish to not judge a group as a group.

 

[Jormungandr]

I think at this point almost everyone on the planet knows at least one gay person they're perfectly fine interacting with.

But for that matter I am pretty certain I've met fucking Emus which I wouldn't mind walking around, doesn't stop the fact a lot of them will probably try kicking or pecking my eyes out.

You can always judge individuals as individuals, but it's impossibly foolish to not judge a group as a group.

Well, emus did win a war. They're hard bastards.