Leftist Child Grooming
- Thread starter Captain X
- Start date
Ixian
Well-known member
Long story short, our education system is geared for the optimal way in which girls and young women learn, and is actively detrimental to boys and young men, and so the "solution" at the time was to try and drug boys until they behaved more like girls.
Also, other than shoving pills down boys throats to make them "calm down" finally slowly stopping, nothing has really changed in our education system and the education gap between boys and girls gets worse every year.
Last edited:
KilroywasNOTHere
"BEEP!"
The more I learn about the intelligence of farmers and tradesmen the more I believe nothing beats the school of hard knocks, experience is the best teacher.
Honestly it might just be best to have boys and girls go to different schools until they reach the high school level. Let them get the foundations of education in a way that works for them and then introduce them back to each other when their older and a bit more mature.
DarthOne
☦️
Agreed. Or at least have male/female only classes.
It really depends on the situation. Bear in mind, in the 19th century and through the early 20th century, public education often wasn't just co-ed, it was co-grade. You had boys and girls from the ages of six to sixteen in a one room schoolhouse with one or two teachers and you got generally good education results. Thing was, those teachers also tended to have more frequent recesses, had the older kids help the younger with their lessons (which then reinforces those lessons, ask anyone who's taught and one of the things they will say is they learn a lot by the simple act of TEACHING it), etc., and if there was no lessons for certain children or they weren't involved in the present lesson they were encouraged to read something appropriate. It was a very different environment than the modern schooling system.
This is a key problem: A lot of women teachers, even ones not into the Groomers United kool-aid, are misandrist to some degree or another. Feminism is a key cause of this.
Mind, there's also a problem with male teachers excusing bullshit behavior from boys too (such as actually groping girls), so there are problems on both sides of the aisle, so-to-speak, but boys and men being demonized is still a key problem.
Ixian
Well-known member
I wasn't even thinking about social issues, but you are correct.
I was thinking about the fact that boys get better grades and girls get worse grades when the teachers doing the grading don't know which are boys and girls.
But yes, it is well know that boys are punished at school far more frequently, and typically harsher than a girl that has broken the same rule. This of course leads to said boys missing more classes and contributes to their ever worsening grades.
It's also worth mentioning that boys, especially young boys in elementary school, are quite often in trouble because they are boys, IE they are punished for acting like boys and not girls, for being fidgety and loud. That ties in with the attempt to drug boys with ADD and ADHD medications in the 90s and early 00s, they were literally trying to medicate the boys to be less like boys and more like girls.
That failed so now they just punish them for it.
I was thinking about the fact that boys get better grades and girls get worse grades when the teachers doing the grading don't know which are boys and girls.
But yes, it is well know that boys are punished at school far more frequently, and typically harsher than a girl that has broken the same rule. This of course leads to said boys missing more classes and contributes to their ever worsening grades.
It's also worth mentioning that boys, especially young boys in elementary school, are quite often in trouble because they are boys, IE they are punished for acting like boys and not girls, for being fidgety and loud. That ties in with the attempt to drug boys with ADD and ADHD medications in the 90s and early 00s, they were literally trying to medicate the boys to be less like boys and more like girls.
That failed so now they just punish them for it.
Who profited? The pharma corps that made the pills made fortunes; and the government benefited as well by having both a docile, medicated male population and a system geared towards females, which, if there is any one truth about females, it is that they follow the leader. They do not question a powerful, established authority figure. And, when backed up by said powerful and established government, they can and very much do exert control over the rest of the now weakened male population. They are the perfect pawns of any would be tyrannical government.
All by design of course. The only reason I didn't suffer that fate is because I had my dad and grand father backing me up. Single family households - particularly single mothers who are likely on pills themselves - are very unlikely to protect their child from being medicated for such bullshit. Again, all by design of course. Destroy the family and destroy God, and profit off of the misery.
Last edited:
And for the record: young girls benefit from physical activity as well. And they should be encouraged to be as physical and athletic as possible. But in most cases (key words: while far from the norm, I have encountered females that would go insane without a more or less male level of physical activity just like males do), it is not a need with young girls. Most of them are just fine with lower levels of activity. It's nature; in prehistoric times they were the ones maintaining the camp, nurturing children and picking berries and stuff. Meanwhile the boys and the men were out hunting, fighting and exploring. Completely different nature and it is malicious, by design, to be doing to western boys what has been done for at this point generations already. All by design of course. fucking demons
Last edited:
Terthna
Professional Lurker
It was an environment built to encourage learning; whereas schools these days are designed to do the opposite, because a willingness to learn makes a person less controllable, less able to be indoctrinated into the cult.
DarthOne
☦️
Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: 'Can happen anywhere'
www.foxnews.com
They don't want you labeled as a parent. Only as a care giver so the state can make decisions without parental consent. No need for parental consent if you're raising the governments child.
Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’
A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.
www.foxnews.com
Parents ask Supreme Court to hold Indiana reponsible for removing transgender child from their home
A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.
In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.
Becket is pursuing the case on behalf of the Coxes, arguing state courts allowed Indiana to keep the child from living in his parents' home due to their disagreement with the child's gender identity because of their religious beliefs. Notably, upon completing the investigation, the state determined the allegations of abuse against Mary and Jeremy were unsubstantiated, but still argued that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child.
Lori Windham, vice president and senior counsel at Becket, told Fox News Digital that no parent should ever have to endure what Mary and Jeremy have been forced to go through.
"Keeping a child away from loving parents because of their religious beliefs—even when the state admits there was no abuse or neglect—is wrong and it's against the law," she said. "The Court should take this case and make clear that other states can't take children away because of ideological disagreements."
In 2019, Mary and Jeremy's son told them that he identified as a girl, but in line with their Catholic religious beliefs that God created human beings with an immutable sex, male or female, they did not believe in referring to him using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biology.
In addition, the Coxes believed their son was struggling with underlying mental health conditions, including an eating disorder, so they sought therapeutic care for both.
But, in 2021, Indiana officials began investigating the Coxes after a report found they were not referring to their child by his preferred gender identity, removing the teen from their custody and placing him in a "gender-affirming" home. Despite the unsubstantiated claims of abuse, they claimed the Coxes made the child's eating disorder worse even though it worsened after he was removed and placed in a transition-affirming home.
The Indiana Department of Child Services declined a Fox News Digital request for comment, saying, "DCS does not comment on ongoing litigation."
Protesters of Kentucky Senate Bill SB150, known as the Transgender Health Bill, cheer on speakers during a rally on the lawn of the Kentucky Capitol in Frankfort, Ky., March 29, 2023. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)
"This is what every parent is afraid of," Mary and Jeremy Cox said in a press release. "We love our son and wanted to care for him, but the state of Indiana robbed us of that opportunity by taking him from our home and banning us from speaking to him about gender."
"We are hopeful that the Justices will take our case and protect other parents from having to endure the nightmare we did," they added.
When the case was first heard in trial court, Indiana officials argued the child "should be in a home where she is [ac]cepted for who she is" and restricted the Coxes' visitation time to a few hours once a week, which barred them from speaking to him about their religious views on human sexuality and gender identity. Even though the court determined the Coxes were fit parents, it upheld the removal of their child which was later upheld by the appeals court.
"If this can happen in Indiana, it can happen anywhere," Windhamn said. "Tearing a child away from loving parents because of their religious beliefs, which are shared by millions of Americans, is an outrage to the law, parental rights, and basic human decency. If the Supreme Court doesn't take this case, how many times will this happen to other families?"
They don't want you labeled as a parent. Only as a care giver so the state can make decisions without parental consent. No need for parental consent if you're raising the governments child.
Ixian
Well-known member
Its because we got rid of the classic one room school house system and replaced it with a system modeled after the Prussian education system.
The Prussians were only interested in getting two things out of their education system, factory workers and soldiers.
Well, in America's case it's "dumb voters and soldiers."
It's not a stereotype or by-sample-basis when people interview twenty-odd something American women on the street who fail basic questions even a Primary Schooler (that'd be ages 5--11) would know ("What country is Cairo in?" "Africa?")
Also, Americans insisting that Dublin or some other location in Wales or Scotland is in England and vice-versa, and they get all pouty when people from those fucking areas correct them (and almost deck them because they called a Scotsman an Englishman. smh).
If your kids aren't being churned into the military, they're basically taught to be dumb, communist-lite voters who vote for whom they're told to vote for, with an illusion of choice.
This isn't a biased sample, people.
Being asked in a setting like that can often add uneeded stress and anxiety.
For instance, I can name just about every ww2 and newer tank.
But when asked in a public forum I often shut down and have messed up
Zack, I'm an utter mess in situations like that on the above camera (hell, I hate even making phone calls), and all I'd need to do is breathe deeply and think for a moment, and even I could answer every single one of those questions (except for one or two of the more America-focused ones, like the exact year the US was founded).
Trying to excuse being a fucking moron on par with a brain-damaged Forrest Gump on nerves/stage fright is a poor excuse, and you know it.
My wife would say something wrong or IDK in these situations due to the stress and anxiety.
I would get cocky and answer wrong and then sigh and curse then answer right.
Not everyone can do this easily especially in the generation of those who have not done public speaking
