Leftist Child Grooming

[ThatZenoGuy]

Porn sites 100% have a creepy agenda. I dunno if it's about grooming kids, but it's certainly about making degeneracy seem more appealing or normalized.

 

[Captain X]

Objectively false.

Based on what? Like I've said, I've actually have personal experience to go on.

Various govts had parlimentary hearings about mindgeek.
Which is an oligarch backed umbrealla corporation that buys out all the smaller porn sites. And makes all of it completely free to kill competition to ensure they have total control over the market.

So trying to set up a monopoly, like so many other businesses?

They are constantly receiving massive financial donations from oligarchs which allow them to operate at a big loss.
And their employees are very hostile towards request for filtering options.

I guess I never had any trouble using their site.

https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/the-canadian-parliaments-hearing-taking-on-mindgeek-executives/

> MindGeek itself publicly stated that all of its content is reviewed by moderators

I have yet to see any evidence that PornHub ever knowingly hosted CP. I'm also aware of an effort to take down 8-Chan by some "journalist" posting CP on their site. It is not a stretch to put the attacks on PornHub and this previous attempt by someone to take down a site they don't like.

Porn sites 100% have a creepy agenda. I dunno if it's about grooming kids, but it's certainly about making degeneracy seem more appealing or normalized.

I'm pressing X to doubt.

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

I'm pressing X to doubt.

So how come they ran an incest campaign despite nobody asking for it?

 

[mrttao]

I have yet to see any evidence that PornHub ever knowingly hosted CP. I'm also aware of an effort to take down 8-Chan by some "journalist" posting CP on their site. It is not a stretch to put the attacks on PornHub and this previous attempt by someone to take down a site they don't like.

> Literally get links that refer to congressional hearings
> Refuse to look at them links
> Say you have not seen any evidence that any CP was ever hosted on pornhub

Well of course you don't see it, you are closing your eyes

 

[Captain X]

So how come they ran an incest campaign despite nobody asking for it?

Probably the same reason the mob tried out different trends when they were behind basically all the porn back in the day - to see if something was popular, or because they thought something already popular, and therefore translate into profit for them.

> Literally get links that refer to congressional hearings
> Refuse to look at them links
> Say you have not seen any evidence that any CP was ever hosted on pornhub

Well of course you don't see it, you are closing your eyes

Again a misrepresentation of what I said. Why you lying like this? Is it because you have no real argument?

 

[Marduk]

Have you ever been to a porn site?

You cannot opt out of any of the deviant pornography.
this is by design, as various govt probes by verious govts has concluded that most porn sites are owned by an umbrella corporation called "Mind Geek" which is owned by the oligarchs. Who are using it as a form of social engineering.

Yes, i'm not retarded, i don't use shitty sites, and i know how to use search criteria. If anyone's answer to these 3 is different from mine, it's their problem to fix.

They are pouring massive amounts of funds into it without regards to profitability. This is why all of them are completely free to watch. By costing nothing they drive their competitors out of business. This is not a profitable business model. but their goal is not to make money.

You ask me if i've ever been to a porn site, then come up with conspiracy theories that show you have no fucking idea about how they make their profits?

Your suggestion of the parents spending all day looking behind the child's shoulder is completely unrealistic.
Children are expected to do their homework online, and since covid to also take their classes online too.

There is software for this. Covid is over. If <14 year child needs access to internet all day, there is something wrong with the parenting.

You are basically expecting a wage slave (or two if you are lucky) to somehow spend multiple hours per day PER each individual child watching over their shoulder as they do their homework on the computer.

I dunno about how it works in America, but i don't think primary school kids do homework all day, and when they do, teachers get outright pissy if they find out wikipedia was used in most cases.

Also, libraries and schools exist and provide unsupervised internet access.

Highly locked down by a school professional and with public looking at the screen. No adult is even occasionally supervising that, again, school problem.

yea they got parental controls, but we established those do not work.

They do work with a somewhat supervised child.
Also neither blockers (nor porn passes) will do absolutely anything to stop an actual pedo, groomer or conman hanging around actual child appropriate sites and trying to get personal info/blackmail/money/nudes out of your child, so better supervise the kid anyway until old, experienced and smart enough to handle this stuff without adult help. Hopefully. Too many adults fall for conmen anyway. Including adults with degrees and security certifications who should know way better in some cases.

I still remember in highschool every time we had computer lab class I would sit in the back and see several people playing video games and several others playing porn on the school computers. Despite software designed to block both.

Again, shitty software or too old kids. As i said, not gonna work against a high schooler with 3 digit IQ who really wants to watch porn, rather than accidentally stumble upon it, and the scenario you pain here really suggests something close to that.

The law was literally passed in texas so this argument is already proven wrong.

Not by referendum, but by politicians, that says little about public support.
And then was blocked by court.

The judge gave the judge's opinion. Captain X did not give a single justification.

The judge's opinion is bogus and retarded.
Compelled speech? Putting aside that porn isn't speech, verifying age is not compelling anything.
Too vague? There is nothing vague about requiring pornographers to check age of customer.
Utter nonsense.

It is in fact your opinion that is bogus and retarded.
Porn is speech, and there is long running precedent for it.
The very far fetched warnings required by the struck down law are the compelled speech.

The only thing that even barely maybe holds water is the privacy claim... And even then it is bullshit since you need to show an ID to get booze, cigarettes, and guns.
You need to show an ID to rent a motel room.

Not to mention there are many ways in which you can maintain anonymity while still doing some basic age verification.

Yet this law did not include such ways of verification, read the bloody article where the judge explains his decision.
Also there is a differencce between selling to a minor what cannot be sold to a minor, aka a commercial transaction, and unpaid media access. Fun fact, at least in some countries TV stations can broadcast 18+ rated stuff after a certain hour without having to verify who's watching every single TV screen in the country at the moment, which inherently carries the implication that most normal parents are making it reasonably sure that at this hour their children are sleeping rather than watching TV.

 

[mrttao]

There is software for this. Covid is over. If <14 year child needs access to internet all day, there is something wrong with the parenting.

Have you been living under a rock?
They still have covid restrictions in 2023 and are bringing it back for 2024.
There are always new "variants"

I dunno about how it works in America, but i don't think primary school kids do homework all day, and when they do, teachers get outright pissy if they find out wikipedia was used in most cases.

I said nothing about wikipedia.
For about 20 years many teachers often require you to type your homework and sometimes submit it as a file. Often via internet.
In modern times, they practically all want you to upload it to special submission sites that check for plagiarism.

10 Free Plagiarism Checking Sites for Teachers - Teaching Expertise

Plagiarism is a problem that plagues teachers from different disciplines and at different levels. It is disheartening and time-consuming to handle (Lambert). This form of cheating can happen in several different ways. Students may lift passages from online journals, articles, or sample papers...

www.teachingexpertise.com

Not to mention various online classroom exercises. Where you log in to do your homework directly at the school website itself via an interactive web page.

There was just now in australia a congressional hearing that went something like
>> Australian children were given online science tests across the country
>> One of the questions was for them to snitch on their parents compliance with covid mandates
>> Why is this question in a national science quiz?
> The question is helping children express themselves.

 

[Marduk]

Have you been living under a rock?
They still have covid restrictions in 2023 and are bringing it back for 2024.
There are always new "variants"

Then it's up to school personnel to supervise your kid at least as much as feasible, just like it is in school. There is even software for it. If it is not done, school and/or parenting problem.

I said nothing about wikipedia.
For about 20 years many teachers often require you to type your homework and sometimes submit it as a file. Often via internet.

Are you going to imply typing requires internet access, or that sending a text file requires hours of constant internet access?

In modern times, they practically all want you to upload it to special submission sites that check for plagiarism.

10 Free Plagiarism Checking Sites for Teachers - Teaching Expertise

Plagiarism is a problem that plagues teachers from different disciplines and at different levels. It is disheartening and time-consuming to handle (Lambert). This form of cheating can happen in several different ways. Students may lift passages from online journals, articles, or sample papers...

www.teachingexpertise.com

Lol, not you, that's for a teacher to do. Literally even says so in the link, your blatant attempts to bullshit me about things i know better than you for the sake of argument puts my opinion of you lower than it already was.

Not to mention various online classroom exercises. Where you log in to do your homework directly at the school website itself via an interactive web page.

There was just now in australia a congressional hearing that went something like
>> Australian children were given online science tests across the country
>> One of the questions was for them to snitch on their parents compliance with covid mandates
>> Why is this question in a national science quiz?
> The question is helping children express themselves.

Another case of "problem with school". Go complain about schools being run like shit instead of trying to restrict the internet for everyone.

 

[mrttao]

Then it's up to school personnel to supervise your kid

Ah yes, let the groomers supervise your child.
GENIUS! What could possibly go wrong.

Oklahoma school defends hiring drag queen principal previously arrested for possessing child porn

A school in Oklahoma, OKLA-FREAKING-HOMA, is defending its decision to hire a drag queen who was previously arrested for possessing kiddie porn, saying they followed their "usual hiring practices."

notthebee.com

BREAKING: Everyone's favorite Canadian shop teacher returns for the new year looking like a new man

I am sure you haven't forgotten about the male Canadian shop teacher with the giant prosthetic breasts that hung down to his belt ... even if you tried.

notthebee.com

Are you going to imply typing requires internet access, or that sending a text file requires hours of constant internet access?

Ah yes, the good old "modem with a lock" that definitely exists and lets parents turn internet on and off except for 5 minutes a day used to submit homework files online. This also shuts off the laptop wifi and any other tricks. And follows your child when he leaves home.

Assuming there are no on site homework like google classroom assignment that is, which will require a few hours instead.

Lol, not you, that's for a teacher to do. Literally even says so in the link, your blatant attempts to bullshit me about things i know better than you for the sake of argument puts my opinion of you lower than it already was.

facepalm. just facepalm.

The article is TITLED "for teachers". but that does not mean the teachers do all the work. Take for example number 3 on the list

If your school uses the "Plus" version of Google for Education, you will already have a plagiarism checker; you'll just need to select the "Check plagiarism" box below the rubric when you create an assignment. If you have GSuite, you'll be able to try out this feature, but there is a limit on the number of assignments that you can check.

After your students submit their work, the tool will flag passages for you as you open different submissions. The checker will also include a link to the original website. The video above walks you through enabling the plagiarism checking feature and using it when viewing student submissions.

If your school uses google classroom. The teacher creates an assignment in google classroom.
The students then open the assignment. Then they do it online.
If the assignment involves an essay, then it is instantly checked for plagiarism by google if the teacher has checked a box that says to do that.

Another case of "problem with school". Go complain about schools being run like shit instead of trying to restrict the internet for everyone.

Good idea, let me update my calendar for the month:
Sept 10: destroy WEF
Sept 12: restore democracy to the western nations
Sept 14: close the borders
Sept 15: arrest all school groomers and end the teacher's union
Sept 16: make all schools in all western nations stop using online tools and instead have them require hand written essays which are submitted in person to the teacher.

 

[Blasterbot]

Good idea, let me update my calendar for the month:
Sept 10: destroy WEF
Sept 12: restore democracy to the western nations
Sept 14: close the borders
Sept 15: arrest all school groomers and end the teacher's union
Sept 16: make all schools in all western nations stop using online tools and instead have them require hand written essays which are submitted in person to the teacher.

at least you got some free days in case something runs long.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

*Sigh* is there anyway to block a thread? I would tell you guys what I think of all this but I can think of at least two if not three site rules that'd be broken.

 

[AnimalNoodles]

No matter how much you don't like it, basically anything in excess can be harmful. So just because you don't like porn, is not a reason to ban it. This desire to ban things so other people can't enjoy them absolutely makes one a petty little tyrant. No different from Leftist cancel culture.


Then you should likewise be against efforts to ban porn.

Cancel culture gets results. Libertarianism doesnt

 

[Scottty]

*Sigh* is there anyway to block a thread? I would tell you guys what I think of all this but I can think of at least two if not three site rules that'd be broken.

I think there's a way to not go into a thread that has stuff you do not want to read.

Anyway, all this big-money porn agenda stuff is on borrowed time. There will be AI that you can run on your PC at home that will generate whatever lewd and naughty image you describe to it, in short order.
(Especially, I suppose, if you have some sort of fetish for malformed hands)

 

[Marduk]

Ah yes, let the groomers supervise your child.
GENIUS! What could possibly go wrong.

Then homeschool, or go private, in which case no covid crazy (which means you left your kid to be supervised by them before covid anyway), 2 problems solved.
No, imagine internet will be something safe to leave a 9 year old with unsupervised if only you turn porn sites into a pain in the ass and privacy risk to access. Are you trying to fool yourself or everyone else?

I think there were plenty enough of criminal cases showing that about the absolutely worst internet threats to children like to hang out around very child appropriate and popular stuff like Minecraft or Roblox related sites and related chat groups of any platform.

Ah yes, the good old "modem with a lock" that definitely exists and lets parents turn internet on and off except for 5 minutes a day used to submit homework files online. This also shuts off the laptop wifi and any other tricks. And follows your child when he leaves home.

Again, you prove that you have no fucking idea about what you are talking about.
All modern routers are password protected, and many have outright schedule functionality, among many other functions most people don't use.
If you don't have even an hour in a day to supervise your kid and neither does your wife nor any other family member, that's a parent problem, and it will likely fuck up your kid more than online porn possibly can.
If your kid knows how to get free unrestricted internet without you knowing using a laptop, he's probably old enough to handle it anyway, because at this point we are sooo far beyond the level of "child way too young to be interested in R18 materials of this or that kind gets flooded with them anyway due to delinquent classmates or clicking links" kind of scenario.

Assuming there are no on site homework like google classroom assignment that is, which will require a few hours instead.

Again, homework, for small kids who can barely not infect the computer with malware if left unsupervised?

facepalm. just facepalm.

The article is TITLED "for teachers". but that does not mean the teachers do all the work. Take for example number 3 on the list

If your school uses google classroom. The teacher creates an assignment in google classroom.
The students then open the assignment. Then they do it online.
If the assignment involves an essay, then it is instantly checked for plagiarism by google if the teacher has checked a box that says to do that.

Stop inventing problems out of thin air. If this is online school, teacher is meant to supervise the kid as much as that allows.
If this is homework, your kid probably is not too retarded to do select all, ctrl+c and paste into google window, lol.

 

[Jormungandr]

I think there's a way to not go into a thread that has stuff you do not want to read.

Anyway, all this big-money porn agenda stuff is on borrowed time. There will be AI that you can run on your PC at home that will generate whatever lewd and naughty image you describe to it, in short order.
(Especially, I suppose, if you have some sort of fetish for malformed hands)

Ironically, a bunch of simps in a porn subreddit basically got catfished by a team of guys using AI to create a "model". They all threw donations at them like dollar bills being thrown at a stripper on a pole.

It's the reason why new 'models' to that subreddit are required to post video proof they're actually people now, hahaha.

 

[Scottty]

Ironically, a bunch of simps in a porn subreddit basically got catfished by a team of guys using AI to create a "model". They all threw donations at them like dollar bills being thrown at a stripper on a pole.

It's the reason why new 'models' to that subreddit are required to post video proof they're actually people now, hahaha.

Video proof, eh?
CGI tech is moving along, you know...

 

[Jormungandr]

Video proof, eh?
CGI tech is moving along, you know...

Basically a girl saying, "Hi, I'm *username or real-name*, and I'm real. Here are my tits and arse jiggling to prove I'm not fake" in a short video clip.

The tech's moving along, but it's not quite there yet -- still pictures, however, are piss easy, and that's how this little cabal made bank off hundreds of simps.

 

[DarthOne]

I think there's a way to not go into a thread that has stuff you do not want to read.

Anyway, all this big-money porn agenda stuff is on borrowed time. There will be AI that you can run on your PC at home that will generate whatever lewd and naughty image you describe to it, in short order.
(Especially, I suppose, if you have some sort of fetish for malformed hands)

We’ll see. We’ll see about that.

 

[King Arts]

The judge gave the judge's opinion. Captain X did not give a single justification.

The judge's opinion is bogus and retarded.
Compelled speech? Putting aside that porn isn't speech, verifying age is not compelling anything.
Too vague? There is nothing vague about requiring pornographers to check age of customer.
Utter nonsense.

The only thing that even barely maybe holds water is the privacy claim... And even then it is bullshit since you need to show an ID to get booze, cigarettes, and guns.
You need to show an ID to rent a motel room.

Not to mention there are many ways in which you can maintain anonymity while still doing some basic age verification.

Now one thing you said could be dangerous. You said porn is not speech. Then could you define what is speech? Do you think the only things that should be protected are spoken words? Do you not think art should be? And while people have made arguments that porn is not art they aren’t good arguments “I’ll know it when I see it.” Makes it subjective and a different judge could make a different decision.

This is exactly what I mean when I saw we jews need to start excommunicating people.
Such utter degeneracy is unacceptable and makes us look bad.

Say I have a question I know Jews themselves are banned from incest. But the majority of the commandments in the Bible don’t apply to gentiles. So can’t they argue that sister fucking is not prohibited for gentiles to do? I remember laughing when I saw a video about that and the noahide laws once.

 

[DarthOne]

Mexican parents burn textbooks infected with 'virus of communism' in fiery protest against gender ideology

Mexican parents burn textbooks infected with ‘virus of communism’ in fiery protest against gender ideology

Parents in Mexico from Christian organizations have taken to the streets in the thousands to oppose new textbooks from the Ministry of Public Education.

nypost.com

Christian groups in Mexico have taken to the streets in protest of their department of education with one group burning books they believed was laced with "Marxist-communist" indoctrination last week, according to a report.

Parents in Mexico from Christian organizations have taken to the streets in the thousands to oppose new textbooks from the Ministry of Public Education they deem to contain sexual and gender ideology content, according to Mexico News Daily. At least 12,000 people attended.

Aguascalientes is one of the 32 states which comprise the Federal Entities of Mexico.

Parents also burned the books in question in Chiapas, a southern Mexican state bordering Guatemala.

Many of the residents of the town are Evangelical Christians.

"At the elementary school in Chiapas… parents in the community piled up boxes of the new textbooks, doused them with fuel and set them afire," the outlet reported.

The textbooks from the Mexican education department has mobilized parents into activism.

Over 112,000 signatures were collected in a petition demanding the textbook's distribution be stopped "because of sexualized and gender ideology content inserted without parental consultation."

Parents in Mexico oppose new textbooks from the Ministry of Public Education they deem to contain sexual and gender ideology content.Twitter


One group burned books they believed were laced with "Marxist-communist" indoctrination.Twitter


Over 112,000 signatures were collected in a petition demanding the textbook's distribution be stopped.Twitter

Mexican President López Obrador responded to the protest, claiming parents are "misinformed and manipulated" by a politicized agenda because they believe that the "virus of communism" is baked into the new, free textbooks.

"They have the right to demonstrate. We are free," he said. The president acknowledged that the textbooks could be improved but maintained the outrage was due to "politicking."

In response to accusations the books were laced with gender ideology indoctrination, the president denied the claims, stating, "They have been prepared by teachers and experts."

𝑽𝒊𝒗𝒂 𝑪𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐 𝑹𝒆𝒚!