Leftist Child Grooming

[Jormungandr]

You know, it gets really old the way you constantly trot out this stereotype.

Like a lot of stereotypes, the issue is mostly a small minority of extremely loud people. There's a reason some states specifically have laws saying 'it can't count as statutory rape if a 17 and a 16 year old are in a relationship, and he suddenly turns 18,' etc, etc.

Would you like it if people constantly ragged on Brits for forcing Opium on foreigners?

And I'm pretty annoyed that Americans shriek that "it's just a minority!" in denial when it clearly isn't, just like with the plague of Black-on-everyone else racism going on even at street/community level.

It's hardly a "small, vocal stereotype" when there are Americans, and many different Americans mind, spout this shit across various platforms the moment a sniff of an age-difference or age gap relationship is mentioned; or how they react the exact same fucking way when a sixteen year old is dating someone who is nineteen or twenty with a thirty-six year old fucking a thirteen year old girl. It's not a "small, vocal stereotype" when Americans go batshit insane in new articles' comments sections over bait pieces like this.

Hell, your own fucking archaic laws can easily be weaponized to destroy someone's life for a basic age-gap relationship (such as teens being seventeen and fifteen) that wouldn't even be blinked at in another country.

Much like how Black-on-everyone racism had its veneer torn off in recent years, this is a thing embedded in American culture. It's a stereotype that's true and one deserved.

Also, unlike Americans being Americans, I have seen zero people from the UK or even various Asian countries (even China) on soc-med or in real-life talk about the Opium Wars or those utter cluster fucks outside of mentioning them in a historical context or as a prop for Chinese nationalism (and even then it's more of a historical thing). False equivalence.

If it is Tennessee Age of Consent is 18.

In that case the priest should've reported it, and it was a bit of a cover up.

 

[LordsFire]

And I'm pretty annoyed that Americans shriek that "it's just a minority!" in denial when it clearly isn't, just like with the plague of Black-on-everyone else racism going on even at street/community level.

Have you ever actually lived in America?

Have you ever done a survey, or even found and read a survey, on what Americans think about relationships with different amounts of age gaps, and whether or not it should be counted as rape?

Hell, have you sat down and talked to some of us in a setting that wasn't a thread on some particular heinous thing or the comments section on an article/youtube video about such a thing that is going to massively select in favor of people who do care about it?

Or is this all just your personal anecdotal experience that you're extrapolating out across the whole nation?

 

[Sobek]

Would you like it if people constantly ragged on Brits for forcing Opium on foreigners?

The CCP loves to do that when dealing with brits actually. Most of us though preffer to point out how Perfidious Albion fucked with the WW1 peace and set the stage for both WW2 and Cold War with their shit handling of the situation.

And the Industrial Revolution of course. Which has been a disaster for the human race.

 

[DarthOne]

The CCP loves to do that when dealing with brits actually. Most of us though preffer to point out how Perfidious Albion fucked with the WW1 peace and set the stage for both WW2 and Cold War with their shit handling of the situation.

And the Industrial Revolution of course. Which has been a disaster for the human race.

Never mind that the British would have gone to war with Imperial Germany eventually if they could come up with a sufficient pretext…

 

[ATP]

The CCP loves to do that when dealing with brits actually. Most of us though preffer to point out how Perfidious Albion fucked with the WW1 peace and set the stage for both WW2 and Cold War with their shit handling of the situation.

And the Industrial Revolution of course. Which has been a disaster for the human race.

Yep.They supported germans till 1939,without that France would crushed them when they were still weak-1936 or 1938.
But idiots belived in their balance of power,when,in german case,Germany united by Berlin mean World war,unless somebody occupy them.Like USA now.

Never mind that the British would have gone to war with Imperial Germany eventually if they could come up with a sufficient pretext…

Balance of Power.Germany were stronger,so brits build coalition against them.But,when they thought that France is stronger after WW1,they supported germans all the time.

If WW1 do not happened and russian reforms worked,brits about 1925 would support germans against tsar.

For them it is notching personal,but they must put Europe on fire when somebody could conqest it.

 

[Cherico]

The Brits took their balance thing to self destructive extremes.

 

[King Arts]

The Brits took their balance thing to self destructive extremes.

Yep.They supported germans till 1939,without that France would crushed them when they were still weak-1936 or 1938.
But idiots belived in their balance of power,when,in german case,Germany united by Berlin mean World war,unless somebody occupy them.Like USA now.


Balance of Power.Germany were stronger,so brits build coalition against them.But,when they thought that France is stronger after WW1,they supported germans all the time.

If WW1 do not happened and russian reforms worked,brits about 1925 would support germans against tsar.

For them it is notching personal,but they must put Europe on fire when somebody could conqest it.

That is exactly why I see the British as an enemy. You know that meme with Germany and historical Germans like Arminius, Martin Luther, Kaiser Wilhelm, Marx, Hitler, and Merkel, and there is a clock with a goodness me look at the time, it's time to burn europe. There is some truth to it, but England is worse. They have thrown themselves out of the fold of western civilization as far as I am concerned they are an existential enemy for them I support gay rights, for them I support more immigration, for them I support less conservatives more trannies, and all of the miseries on earth.

 

[Jormungandr]

To be fair, it had worked out for centuries until that point.

It's just that the advancing of the times (technology, societal progression, military doctrine though that itself lagged behind technology as seen in WW1, et cetera) was quickly rendering it obsolete, and the Empire didn't adapt. They tried to keep the status quo, and it was a fucking stupid strategy.

And then WW1 exploded onto the scene. 'nuff said.

 

[Aldarion]

That is exactly why I see the British as an enemy. You know that meme with Germany and historical Germans like Arminius, Martin Luther, Kaiser Wilhelm, Marx, Hitler, and Merkel, and there is a clock with a goodness me look at the time, it's time to burn europe. There is some truth to it, but England is worse. They have thrown themselves out of the fold of western civilization as far as I am concerned they are an existential enemy for them I support gay rights, for them I support more immigration, for them I support less conservatives more trannies, and all of the miseries on earth.

To be fair, UK, France and Germany had all made significant contributions towards destroying Europe.

UK - general behavior
France - multiple alliances with the Ottomans, fighting against the HRE during its wars against the Ottomans, the French Revolution, and of course the Paris Commune
Germany - birth place of Protestantism, birth place of Marxism and Nazism

 

[ATP]

To be fair, UK, France and Germany had all made significant contributions towards destroying Europe.

UK - general behavior
France - multiple alliances with the Ottomans, fighting against the HRE during its wars against the Ottomans, the French Revolution, and of course the Paris Commune
Germany - birth place of Protestantism, birth place of Marxism and Nazism

Not germany,but Berlin - but,aside from that,i agree.
HRE was not bad thing.And german catholics,till 1939,was OK,too.

About France - till 1500 they were OK,just like England.

P.S England under Stuarts was OK,too.

 

[IndyFront]

That is exactly why I see the British as an enemy. You know that meme with Germany and historical Germans like Arminius, Martin Luther, Kaiser Wilhelm, Marx, Hitler, and Merkel, and there is a clock with a goodness me look at the time, it's time to burn europe. There is some truth to it, but England is worse. They have thrown themselves out of the fold of western civilization as far as I am concerned they are an existential enemy for them I support gay rights, for them I support more immigration, for them I support less conservatives more trannies, and all of the miseries on earth.

You do realize there are quite a bit of people that see those as net positives, yes? Why give your enemies what they want lmfao

 

[King Arts]

You do realize there are quite a bit of people that see those as net positives, yes? Why give your enemies what they want lmfao

I'm against those things because they are bad. I'm against drugs because they are bad. Tell me do you want your enemies to be happy and successful? For example if someone you like was having drugs pushed on them that would make them an addict you would want to stop that right? Now if you saw someone you absolutely hated being turned into an addict you would not mind so much.(Assuming of course you could make it so that the addict would not be a danger to you because they attack you to get more drugs or something like that.)

 

[IndyFront]

I'm against those things because they are bad. I'm against drugs because they are bad. Tell me do you want your enemies to be happy and successful? For example if someone you like was having drugs pushed on them that would make them an addict you would want to stop that right? Now if you saw someone you absolutely hated being turned into an addict you would not mind so much.(Assuming of course you could make it so that the addict would not be a danger to you because they attack you to get more drugs or something like that.)

You weren't talking about drugs though, you were talking about very specific things with their own definitions

 

[mrttao]

I'm against those things because they are bad. I'm against drugs because they are bad. Tell me do you want your enemies to be happy and successful? For example if someone you like was having drugs pushed on them that would make them an addict you would want to stop that right? Now if you saw someone you absolutely hated being turned into an addict you would not mind so much.(Assuming of course you could make it so that the addict would not be a danger to you because they attack you to get more drugs or something like that.)

While it initially looks sensible. There are severe problems with that mindset too.

1. now that he is a drug addict/mentally ill, he is even more harmful and hostile to all others. It takes time for those illnesses to kill him off. during which he will harm many others

2. PR attacks to encourage self harm are even worse than bioweapons with how they spread across the world and harm indiscriminately. (ex: communism, feminism, LGBTP, woke cult, replacement migration, drugs, etc). Citizens in target victim country convince those in your country.

3. Corporations spring up to financially benefit from the citizens who wish to consume the tripe. and said corporations further spread it

4. In order for the attack to commence, you must openly claim that evil is good and good is evil. This undermines your own credibility, as well as provides an additional vector for the introduction of these mental diseases to your own people.

5. It undermines either yourself or your allies who are trying to advocate for stopping these problems at home.

6. Once the enemy is infected, their govt starts actively spreading their ideology abroad. even if you are resistant to your target via being their enemy, they will spread it to other countries who will in turn put pressure on you.

The harm you cause to your enemy is simply not worth it.
Plus it is evil too, but if you are gonna be evil at least be less stupid about it and use something less harmful then a memetic attack... like bioweapons

disclaimer: please do not use bioweapons. while not as awful, they are still utterly awful and also spread beyond their initial target.

 

[mspence]

So here's what another "enlightened" group is supporting:

Largest teachers union wants kids to read book describing lewd acts

The largest teachers union in America on Monday recommended that educators include "Gender Queer" in their summer reading, a book that has drawn major controversy.

www.foxnews.com

 

[bintananth]

So here's what another "enlightened" group is supporting:

Largest teachers union wants kids to read book describing lewd acts

The largest teachers union in America on Monday recommended that educators include "Gender Queer" in their summer reading, a book that has drawn major controversy.

www.foxnews.com

Depending on what's in it a procesutor might be able to press criminal charges which stick if a school hands that to minors and the police get a complaint.

 

[mrttao]

Depending on what's in it a procesutor might be able to press criminal charges which stick if a school hands that to minors and the police get a complaint.

they can, but they won't.

Police in a Seattle suburb are on the hunt for a guy who left tire tracks on a pride flag crosswalk. However, naked cyclists who exposed themselves to kids are apparently protected by the law.

Welcome to the Left Coast!

notthebee.com

I also recently saw a video of a guy filming himself calling the cops...
paraphrasing the conversation it went like:

>> "I saw naked men are exposing themselves to children yesterday"
> "was it during the pride parade"?
>> "yes"
> "we get those calls every year. yes."
>> "is it ok?"
> "we can't do anything about it"
>> "what about outside the pride parades"
> "that is illegal"
>> "so you can do it in the pride parade, but any other time you will get arrested"
> "yes"

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

they can, but they won't.

Police in a Seattle suburb are on the hunt for a guy who left tire tracks on a pride flag crosswalk. However, naked cyclists who exposed themselves to kids are apparently protected by the law.

Welcome to the Left Coast!

notthebee.com

I also recently saw a video of a guy filming himself calling the cops...
paraphrasing the conversation it went like:

>> "I saw naked men are exposing themselves to children yesterday"
> "was it during the pride parade"?
>> "yes"
> "we get those calls every year. yes."
>> "is it ok?"
> "we can't do anything about it"
>> "what about outside the pride parades"
> "that is illegal"
>> "so you can do it in the pride parade, but any other time you will get arrested"
> "yes"

>MFW we officially have gotten into state sanctioned sexual child exposure

 

[Sobek]

Just Following Orders

 

[Typhonis]

Just Following Orders

Didn't help the Schutzstaffel during the Nuremberg war crimes trials.

There does come a point where following orders , as a defense, does not work.