Leftist Child Grooming

Reader mode
Aldarion

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
Scottty said:
Well there's being free to speak... and there's still being free after you speak.
Communists will sometimes pretend to believe in open expression of opinion, will encourage everyone to speak their minds freely... so that they can see who to round up and kill later.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that is literally what they did in 1945. in Croatia. They organized elections with voting ballot.

You had one party - the National Front (a.k.a. the Communist Party). Voting was only "FOR" and "AGAINST".

Voting was not anonymous.

And seeing how Communists had begun their pre-election campaign - which consisted mostly of murdering political opponents - as early as 1941., it was quite obvious what would happen to anyone who voted against.
 
Zyobot

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Scottty said:
Well there's being free to speak... and there's still being free after you speak.
Communists will sometimes pretend to believe in open expression of opinion, will encourage everyone to speak their minds freely... so that they can see who to round up and kill later.
Click to expand...

Aldarion said:
Yeah, that is literally what they did in 1945. in Croatia. They organized elections with voting ballot.

You had one party - the National Front (a.k.a. the Communist Party). Voting was only "FOR" and "AGAINST".

Voting was not anonymous.

And seeing how Communists had begun their pre-election campaign - which consisted mostly of murdering political opponents - as early as 1941., it was quite obvious what would happen to anyone who voted against.
Click to expand...

Not knowledgeable about Croatia, but I believe Mao initially welcomed (or, you know, "welcomed") criticism from other party members and the public for precisely this reason, too?

Like any Red despot, he'd have noted exactly who said what and had them purged as soon as the trap was ready to spring — as I suspect many Western world leaders today are also looking to do, once their opposition gets "rowdy enough" to justify crushing for real. :oops:
 
mrttao

mrttao

Well-known member
Sobek said:
archive.ph

Woman loses fight to see daughter’s sex education content

archived 13 Jun 2023 15:38:11 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph

You will surrender your child to the State.

You will allow it to be groomed.

And you will not question it.
Click to expand...
The doublethink is strong in that one
A spokesman for the School of Sexuality Education said: "We have always provided full transparency to caregivers and will continue to do so; we believe caregivers have a right to know what their children are being taught and actively encourage schools to involve parents. We welcome the tribunal's ruling that protects our intellectual property, and allows us to continue to deliver inclusive RSE to young people."
Click to expand...
Full Transparency = It is a secret you cannot see
 
Scottty

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
mrttao said:
The doublethink is strong in that one

Full Transparency = It is a secret you cannot see
Click to expand...

Notice how they are (as they often do) replacing old-fashioned words with plain honest meanings, with new words of their own with their own limited or elastic meanings.
Children in traditional human societies have parents.
Children in Leftyland LGBTPtopia merely have "caregivers".
 
Jormungandr

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
Haha, seeing these Leftoid teachers meltdown and panic at any sign of disobedience warms my cold, dead heart.

"If you don't accept all this Groomers United Cultist shit being forced down your throat, you're the problem."

The fact that one kid said she felt "pressured/intimidated" into participating is another glaring sign that Groomers United are a cult. This is what brainwashing cults do to its members to keep them in line.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 1, guests: 3)
Top