Leftist Child Grooming

The truth is of course that no, not every LGHDTV person is some child diddler.

But when people started shouting 'groomer!', they started acting as if they were being singled out, targeted, and that something they wanted secret was being leaked.

Now...

Why would 'that' be?
He didn't say every single one of the alphabet people is a pedo.
He said the IDEALOGY is pedophile ideology. Which is absolutely spot on.
It has always been from day one a pedo ideology. IIRC it literally came out of NAMBLA. MSM did coverups for it, but it is what it is.
 
He didn't say every single one of the alphabet people is a pedo.
He said the IDEALOGY is pedophile ideology. Which is absolutely spot on.
It has always been from day one a pedo ideology. IIRC it literally came out of NAMBLA. MSM did coverups for it, but it is what it is.
Reee, Cmon I thought the LGHDTV joke was good!

But they do reproduce using other people's children, that's true. It's literally the only way they can propagate.
 
The truth is of course that no, not every LGHDTV person is some child diddler.

But when people started shouting 'groomer!', they started acting as if they were being singled out, targeted, and that something they wanted secret was being leaked.

Now...

Why would 'that' be?
They see it, for some reason, as an attack on all gay/lesbian/Bi people than the elements in their toxic community which are full on predators. To them, it's an "us vs them" situation than a "them vs all the kiddie-fuckers and outright degenerates in our community".

And, yes, I call the LGBTIAQIAKitchenSink+ community toxic because it's an utter cess pit: There are many reasons why the sane/normal members of it are trying to retroactively split back into just the LGB community, after all.

Here's what a lot of them don't want to accept: If someone's a regular, normal person who happens to be gay/Bi than straight, the broader strokes [I say this because there will always be parents/families who will stupidly disown their kids for coming out -- they're the ones who need help/support] of Western society? No one cares. Seriously, it's a "whoopey fucking do" thing.



We all have gay/Bi/lesbian friends or acquaintances, even if they're on the outskirts of our friend groups, communities, or workplace. No one cares.

If they're a, well, an utter weirdo that walks around in leather fishnets and a dog mask, or someone who makes their entire personality their orientation, and yes we see this especially in media with certain stars/actors like Ncuti Gatwa, or someone who writes an agenda into their work because they can't just help themselves, like Russel T. Davies, that's who people dislike/think are the fucking freaks, and these people have become the face of the Kitchen Sink community.

Let's put it this way and flip the orientations around: If a straight man went around loudly proclaiming about fucking women constantly, or doing everything he can to prove his, er, "heteroness", you're gonna think he's an utter douche/cunt and think, "what the fuck is wrong with you?" after three seconds on meeting him.

What about if the guy in question wrote a drama of a much older guy, e.g. his late twenties/early thirties, lusting after a sixteen/seventeen year old naive girl, to much "critical acclaim"? Oh, wait, that was the remake of Queer as Folk, which had a 29 year old dude falling in love and regularly fucking a 17 year old boy.

And, of course, not mentioned in the above are the predators, abusers, exploiters, and kiddie-fuckers who are using the Kitchen Sink Community as a shield/cover, like that soprano group in America that was literally saying "we're coming for your children" and it turned out over two-thirds, IIRC, were actual convicted kiddie-fuckers, or "Jessica Yaniv" who follows little girls into bathrooms and locker rooms, or male athletes who "transition" because they're too much of a bunch of fucking losers to succeed in men's sporting leagues [e.g. "Lea Thomas"].

So, yeah: Again, no one really cares if someone's gay, Bi, or a lesbian if they're just a regular, normal person. The issues people have are with the freaks, degenerates, kiddie-fuckers, abusers, exploiters, et cetera, but the toxic Alphabet Soup community as a whole views the rightful disdain towards these detestable cunts as being an attack on all gay, Bi, and lesbian people.

Oh! And let's mention that a good portion of that community turns on bisexual people on the regular, viewing them as either "traitors" if they decide to date/settle down with someone of the opposite gender, e.g. a Bi woman marrying a straight man, or "bisexuals don't exist; they're just gays/lesbians in denial".
 
I have posted on here about my friend who's just a regular lesbian and can't stand the whole movement, mostly because of the Ts.

Part of what I've posted about is how most LGBs who hate this shit are scared to speak out against the Ts, because they'll get pushed out from the community and ostracized.

She's telling me these days that more and more are getting the courage to speak out. She calls it "old gays" lol.

But anyways, if that trend continues, that's great for them. The Ts have done more harm to the LGBs than anyone else that I can think of.
 
I cannot imagine the frustration of the older hands in the Alphabet Soup. By older I mean those who fought to be treated fairly under the law half a century ago or so, and as fas they are concerned that battle was won. Now you have genuine freaks infesting the movement, doing despicable things, and aside from the likely genuine moral horror over it all, the older hands are probably thinking “oh fuck, civil rights wise these idiots are going to blast us back to the Stone Age.”

Granted that is the curse of leftism in any shape or form: it does not know where to stop.

But I don’t hold that against the older hands.

Bearing in mind, it isn’t just the old gays. More than a few genuine trans have been raising the alarm about gender stuff being directed at children for a while.
 
It's utterly unsurprising and I think it's funny. There are no "normal" people in the movement. It has been, from the very start, this same pit of degeneracy. It's only now when the societal pressures have been removed that these so called normal LGBs have come forward.

Because, now that it's normalized everyone can very plainly see what was going on in the community. So they need to back track to this "normality" bullshit or the actually normal people will have a natural justification for their discrimination instead of a purely supernatural one.

It's always been this way. But it's never been thrown into such stark relief why the taboos against the alphabet people were completely justified.

Edit: Individual harms against any alphabet person are completely unacceptable. But as a block the practices and tolerance for alphabet people's behaviors should not be allowed.
 
Last edited:
It's utterly unsuprising and I think it's funny. There are no "normal" people in the movement. It has been, from the very start, this same pit of degeneracy. It's only now when the soceital pressures have been removed that these so called normal LGBs have come forward.

Because, now that it's normalized everyone can very plainly see what was going on in the community. So they need to back track to this "normality" bullshit or the actually normal people will have a natural justification for their discrimination instead of a purely supernatural one.

It's always been this way. But it's never been thrown into such stark relief why the taboos against the alphabet people were completely justified.

Edit: Individual harms agaisnt any alphabet person are completely unacceptable. But as a block the practices and tolerance for alphabet people's behaviors should not be tolerated.

You said it better then I could have.
 
It's utterly unsuprising and I think it's funny. There are no "normal" people in the movement. It has been, from the very start, this same pit of degeneracy. It's only now when the soceital pressures have been removed that these so called normal LGBs have come forward.
No, it's only with the societal pressures being removed that "merely" homosexual people became a stable thing at all, as with it in effect the hypersexual degenerate community is the only available outlet as trying anything else gets you de-facto exiled at best. By the incredibly vast majority of metrics, LGB people have consistently become more normal as the barriers to such are removed, but the activists in "The Movement" need to keep finding issues to keep getting funding and so becomes ever less normal.

Even most of the people who've been denying the degeneracy of homosexuality are starting to see why the fence was put there at this point.
To paraphrase the above, it's that one must be increasingly extreme to find purpose in making a point of their homosexuality, not that homosexuals at large are becoming more degenerate. When they're not marginalized, they have little reason to join the coalition.
 
Some of you are shining examples of why people complain that conservates are just liberals/neo-liberals from a decade or two back. Newsflash, just going back to the 1980's/1990's/2000's just means we will be in the same place we are now all over again in a few decade.
 
No, it's only with the societal pressures being removed that "merely" homosexual people became a stable thing at all, as with it in effect the hypersexual degenerate community is the only available outlet as trying anything else gets you de-facto exiled at best. By the incredibly vast majority of metrics, LGB people have consistently become more normal as the barriers to such are removed, but the activists in "The Movement" need to keep finding issues to keep getting funding and so becomes ever less normal.


To paraphrase the above, it's that one must be increasingly extreme to find purpose in making a point of their homosexuality, not that homosexuals at large are becoming more degenerate. When they're not marginalized, they have little reason to join the coalition.
"increasingly extreme to find purpose in making a point of their homosexuality"

...you understand that's the problem, right? The entire reason it's disordered and not "normal" is that the focus of their purpose is the sexuality to the exclusion of other things. It's why under pressure, they get more degenerate and not more "normal". It's why they turn a blind eye to the predators in their midst. It's why they think it's an injustice to in any way curtail their sexual activities. "Normal" people accept limitations on their sexuality all the damn time. America is pretty damn prudish in this regard with both legal and cultural restrictions on our sexuality from censorship to indecency statutes. The things "normal" people do stay in the bedroom or in closed circles. And that ignores that your sexuality is a distant second or third on the priority list.

The worst part is that it's a multi-faceted problem that intersects with the failure modes of "normal" people as well. Incels share the same problem with the alphabet people and share the same problems with the entirely depraved or either side of this issue.

There is a reason sexual immorality has been such a big problem for humanity. In all its forms it is highly corruptive and corrosive to social cohesion and trust, let alone to individuals. So, to be fair to the alphabet people, this problem is not unique to them and I don't hold that much animosity toward individual alphabet people... until their shit touches me or mine. However, I hold anyone in contempt that let's their degeneracy effect me or mine.

So to be frank, this problem isn't really about alphabet people at all. They're just in the way when we, as a society, try to limit this utterly destructive aspect of the human condition.
 
Some of you are shining examples of why people complain that conservates are just liberals/neo-liberals from a decade or two back. Newsflash, just going back to the 1980's/1990's/2000's just means we will be in the same place we are now all over again in a few decade.
The world in the early 00's to roughly 2010 had its problems, but sanity, frankly, prevailed, and things were relatively stable or had issues so pushed down/controlled that society actually worked properly. In the last fifteen years, we've taken a swan-dive into the abyss because of "tolerance" and such, and everything is basically falling apart.

Twenty years ago, a lot of the things openly celebrated now would've had someone rightfully refered to a mental health specialist at best, or their being sectioned for evaluation at the worst.

If we could go back twenty years or so and it'd hold, I'd be all for it because at least Western civilization/society would be stable/working then.

To hold conversative values doesn't mean going back forty years or so, or viewing things from a puritan religious standpoint.
 
The world in the early 00's to roughly 2010 had its problems, but sanity, frankly, prevailed, and things were relatively stable or had issues so pushed down/controlled that society actually worked properly. In the last fifteen years, we've taken a swan-dive into the abyss because of "tolerance" and such, and everything is basically falling apart.

Twenty years ago, a lot of the things openly celebrated now would've had someone rightfully refered to a mental health specialist at best, or their being sectioned for evaluation at the worst.

If we could go back twenty years or so and it'd hold, I'd be all for it because at least Western civilization/society would be stable/working then.

To hold conversative values doesn't mean going back forty years or so, or viewing things from a puritan religious standpoint.

giphy.gif


Those attitudes back then are how we've gotten to where we are now. They were the thin end of the wedge, the begining of the slippery slope.

kw7lx04t2r391.png



EDIT: Also, if you think I am 'puritanical', you have seen nothing.
 
sigh I keep forgetting we're in the 202X's now. As someone who was a teen in the early/mid 00's, I feel old.

If you're thinking the 50's and 60's et cetera, that'd be a "hell no" from me.
... lol. My dude, I'm what normal "Catholics" call a radtrad. I think we need a do over from the Great Schism. I'll accept a mulligan at the Reformation.
 
sigh I keep forgetting we're in the 202X's now. As someone who was a teen in the early/mid 00's, I feel old.

If you're thinking the 50's and 60's et cetera, that'd be a "hell no" from me.

Further. Though I am curious to know what about the 50's and 60's you dislike.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top