Leftist Child Grooming

Carrot of Truth

War is Peace
Why wait that long....?

I think that thirst for revenge will happen regardless of weather this is stopped now or not, Because there are already some kids that have been treated like lab rats. When they get older and are suffering from health problems I wouldn't be surprised if some of them start crusading to imprison the ones responsible for this or worse.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
It won't work.

Title IX is inferior to the First Amendment, and this is running straight into "compelled speech" territory as well as not being the kind of thing that Title IX is supposed to protect against. It's gonna be a long slog through the courts, but in the end this is going to end up with the US Supreme Court smacking down the Title IX complaint pretty harshly.

Or more likely, changing the First Amendment.

Left holds the political power, and are not afraid to use it.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
These people will get their come-uppance the same time that bitch Maxwell and the clients of her's/Epstein's do; aka never, because the people in power are pedo's and groomers too.

Short of all out nuclear war utterly destroying human civ back to the Stone Age or worse, the people who keep pushing most of this grooming shit and there pedo friends in power will never face any mortal retribution or justice for what they've done.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
These people will get their come-uppance the same time that bitch Maxwell and the clients of her's/Epstein's do; aka never, because the people in power are pedo's and groomers too.

Short of all out nuclear war utterly destroying human civ back to the Stone Age or worse, the people who keep pushing most of this grooming shit and there pedo friends in power will never face any mortal retribution or justice for what they've done.
They won't be punished this decade yes but they have hit the apex of their power. Give it another 40 to 50 year's
 

DarthOne

☦️


It’s true. It’s all true.

We've known for quite some time that Bisphenol A (BPA) was an endocrine disruptor. It's been widely speculated that BPA exposure during pregnancy increases both the chance of homosexuality and gender identity disorder among males. We have to decide between having extra-stretchy plastic and learning a bunch of new pronouns, and apparently we thought the stretchy-plastic was more important.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder


It’s true. It’s all true.
Yep, Alex Jones was on the nose with this one, and the evidence is some of the environmental groups have known about for a while but were dismissed as 'stupid hippies' when they brought it up.

Hormone disruptors in the wild have nasty knock-on effects for whole chunks of the biosphere, and definitely can lead to issues in the young of many species.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
I think the increase is likely a combination of bullshit in the food and retarded parents jumping on the latest trend.

I'm betting on the latter


karen-time-to-go.jpeg


really betting on the later.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Or more likely, changing the First Amendment.

Left holds the political power, and are not afraid to use it.
. . .



OK. Let's get something straight.

The Left, which supposedly holds the political power, has not yet been able to change the much less popular 2nd Amendment... to say they could change the 1st shows three major things:

1. Once again, you know jack shit of what you're talking about when it comes to the American system.

2. The utter ridiculous difficulty that is required to alter the US Constitution.

3. Your ignorance of the FACT that despite what you think, that the Left does not actually control the power necessary to alter the Constitution... in fact they have so little power to effectively alter the Constitution that it is actually the Right that is closer to being able to alter the US Constitution on a whim.

Allow me to explain, oh blackpilled idiot, the exact game required to ALTER the US Constitution. There's two main methods. We'll go over the first because it's the only one the Left even has a minor CHANCE at using, the second is so far out of their league that it is actually the US Right that is closing in on the required power to be able to use it.

FIRST... to ALTER the Constitution requires an amendment pass the US House with a two-third majority vote. (Issue #1: Democrats only control 51% of the House of Representatives). And then an amendment must pass the US Senate with another two-thirds majority. (Issue #2: Democrats only control 51% of the US Senate).

If an amendment manages to pass both those that's NOT ENOUGH. It then is sent out to the STATES for a Vote and need 3/4ths of the States to ratify (pass) the amendment. Let's just count states where each party controls the Legislative and Executive branches at present. Democrats have total control of... 13 States... that is 26%. Republicans on the other hand? 23 States or 46%. The remaining 14 States are of mixed governments and even if you, somehow, added ALL of them to the Democrat's total you're still TEN STATES SHY of the required number to amend the Constitution.

So, before you wave around your "woah all is lost the Progressives are unstoppable bullshit" how about you actually LEARN what is required to alter things like the US Constitution. There's a reason the Democrats haven't tried passing a Constitutional Amendment since the failure of the so-called Equal Rights Amendment in the 1980s and its explicitly because the actual facts on the ground for amending the Constitution are much more in favor of the Right.

Oh, as to the second way to amend the Constitution? That requires two-thirds of the State legislatures to call for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments that then are required to be ratified by 3/4ths of the State Legislatures. In other words, once again it depends on STATE LEGISLATIVE POWER which greatly favors the Right in the US, not the Left.
 

DarthOne

☦️
. . .



OK. Let's get something straight.

The Left, which supposedly holds the political power, has not yet been able to change the much less popular 2nd Amendment... to say they could change the 1st shows three major things:

1. Once again, you know jack shit of what you're talking about when it comes to the American system.

2. The utter ridiculous difficulty that is required to alter the US Constitution.

3. Your ignorance of the FACT that despite what you think, that the Left does not actually control the power necessary to alter the Constitution... in fact they have so little power to effectively alter the Constitution that it is actually the Right that is closer to being able to alter the US Constitution on a whim.

Allow me to explain, oh blackpilled idiot, the exact game required to ALTER the US Constitution. There's two main methods. We'll go over the first because it's the only one the Left even has a minor CHANCE at using, the second is so far out of their league that it is actually the US Right that is closing in on the required power to be able to use it.

FIRST... to ALTER the Constitution requires an amendment pass the US House with a two-third majority vote. (Issue #1: Democrats only control 51% of the House of Representatives). And then an amendment must pass the US Senate with another two-thirds majority. (Issue #2: Democrats only control 51% of the US Senate).

If an amendment manages to pass both those that's NOT ENOUGH. It then is sent out to the STATES for a Vote and need 3/4ths of the States to ratify (pass) the amendment. Let's just count states where each party controls the Legislative and Executive branches at present. Democrats have total control of... 13 States... that is 26%. Republicans on the other hand? 23 States or 46%. The remaining 14 States are of mixed governments and even if you, somehow, added ALL of them to the Democrat's total you're still TEN STATES SHY of the required number to amend the Constitution.

So, before you wave around your "woah all is lost the Progressives are unstoppable bullshit" how about you actually LEARN what is required to alter things like the US Constitution. There's a reason the Democrats haven't tried passing a Constitutional Amendment since the failure of the so-called Equal Rights Amendment in the 1980s and its explicitly because the actual facts on the ground for amending the Constitution are much more in favor of the Right.

Oh, as to the second way to amend the Constitution? That requires two-thirds of the State legislatures to call for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments that then are required to be ratified by 3/4ths of the State Legislatures. In other words, once again it depends on STATE LEGISLATIVE POWER which greatly favors the Right in the US, not the Left.


Honestly the biggest problem we face with Leftists being in charge is that they'll just plain ignore the Constitution and that there is no one left in the enforcement apparatus who will enforce anything on them for doing so.
Exactly.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
. . .



OK. Let's get something straight.

The Left, which supposedly holds the political power, has not yet been able to change the much less popular 2nd Amendment... to say they could change the 1st shows three major things:

1. Once again, you know jack shit of what you're talking about when it comes to the American system.

2. The utter ridiculous difficulty that is required to alter the US Constitution.

3. Your ignorance of the FACT that despite what you think, that the Left does not actually control the power necessary to alter the Constitution... in fact they have so little power to effectively alter the Constitution that it is actually the Right that is closer to being able to alter the US Constitution on a whim.

Allow me to explain, oh blackpilled idiot, the exact game required to ALTER the US Constitution. There's two main methods. We'll go over the first because it's the only one the Left even has a minor CHANCE at using, the second is so far out of their league that it is actually the US Right that is closing in on the required power to be able to use it.

FIRST... to ALTER the Constitution requires an amendment pass the US House with a two-third majority vote. (Issue #1: Democrats only control 51% of the House of Representatives). And then an amendment must pass the US Senate with another two-thirds majority. (Issue #2: Democrats only control 51% of the US Senate).

If an amendment manages to pass both those that's NOT ENOUGH. It then is sent out to the STATES for a Vote and need 3/4ths of the States to ratify (pass) the amendment. Let's just count states where each party controls the Legislative and Executive branches at present. Democrats have total control of... 13 States... that is 26%. Republicans on the other hand? 23 States or 46%. The remaining 14 States are of mixed governments and even if you, somehow, added ALL of them to the Democrat's total you're still TEN STATES SHY of the required number to amend the Constitution.

So, before you wave around your "woah all is lost the Progressives are unstoppable bullshit" how about you actually LEARN what is required to alter things like the US Constitution. There's a reason the Democrats haven't tried passing a Constitutional Amendment since the failure of the so-called Equal Rights Amendment in the 1980s and its explicitly because the actual facts on the ground for amending the Constitution are much more in favor of the Right.

Oh, as to the second way to amend the Constitution? That requires two-thirds of the State legislatures to call for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments that then are required to be ratified by 3/4ths of the State Legislatures. In other words, once again it depends on STATE LEGISLATIVE POWER which greatly favors the Right in the US, not the Left.


You know, if you are going to call others idiots, take a look into a mirror first.

You are acting precisely like the oh-so-smart conservatives have been for the last several decades... "it will never happen"... and then it does.

To explain it to your shortsighted ass: I am not talking in any specific time stamps. I am not talking in terms of what is possible right now. What I am talking about is what the Left is aiming for. And unless you (as in, American conservatives) get your head screwed on straight, unless you realize that, yes, the Left is serious about it, then you are basically helping the Left.

True, what I have written may be impossible. Right now. But it is not going to stay impossible forever. You are acting like a regular smoked-up Republican, saying that "muh laws", "muh Constitution"...

Get this through your skull: the Left does not care. They never had, they never will. If they cannot alter the Constitution, they will simply ignore it. They are doing that already anyway (look at all the gun control laws - every single one of them is outright unconstitutional from what I can tell, yet they are there to stay).

The politics are the art of the possible. But for the Left, their rhetoric has long stated what they want. American leftists have been attacking the very foundational principles of the United States from the very beginning. While the so-called conservatives are battling it over relatively irrelevant stuff such as the White House and the Congress, the Left have been doing everything in their power to make sure that the next generation of voters are leftists. While the Right is thinking about how to win the Congress, the Left is thinking about how to indoctrinate your children that they become even more leftist than they themselves are.

And they have already succeeded. Today's Republicans are de facto leftists. They are only right wing relative to the absolute Marxist insanity that is the Democrat Party. But how many true conservatives - that is, paleoconservatives - do you think are there in the Republican Party? Donald Trump was one of rare paleoconservatives, and quite a few Republicans blew up the moment he arrived. The only reason opposition was not more significant was that Trump enjoyed wide popular support.

But even with that popular support, what exactly has Trump achieved? What did he do to undermine the real roots of the Left's power in the United States?

As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing.

Educational system is still dominated by the Left.
Mainstream media are still dominated by the Left.
Alternative media are being besieged by the Left - if you compare how free Internet was only ten years ago, today's Internet is the outright People's Republic of Tyranny. And it is still getting worse.

So where, exactly, is the Right winning that actually matters? Bloody hell, can you tell me single major area where the Right is putting up the fight? And please don't come up with some utterly irrelevant thing such as "gun rights" - Left obviously isn't going to waste their energy on low-significance shit while there is still major fish to chew. I mean, sure, if they can take it in a low-effort sweep, they will (as they did in Europe). But it is overall irrelevant, and they know it is irrelevant.

What matters is education and indoctrination. The Left has managed to take these areas, and is now taking over courts of law (or maybe they already had, I'm not entirely sure). Humans are, by their nature, dumb sheeple - by and large, they will think what the educational system and the media tell them to think. The Left is playing the long game. Everything you have listed? It will not matter unless the Right manages to win, or at least stop the Left's advance, in the indoctrination game.

Left doesn't need to win against the Republican party. Turning the Republican party into a bunch of leftists is much easier, if maybe more time consuming. But they are already halfway there.

I am not saying all is lost. But if the Right is to have any chance at stopping the Left, they have to realize how the Left is playing the game. Naive people like you are the main reason why we are losing: while the Right is fighting for the Parliament, the Left is taking over kindergartens and schools. And these are far more important than a bunch of stuck-up geriatrics.

Again: Constitution does not matter. Amendments do not matter. Laws do not matter. Legislation does not matter. Representation does not matter. This is not a legal war, this is a war of ideas. The only thing that matters is indoctrination - education and propaganda. The end.

THIS IS THE LEFT:


You really think you can fight that with laws?

Get real.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top