What do you mean?I may have been wrong. This might not last to next week if this transcript is accurate.
What do you mean?
Given I have seen a number of people showing a complete lack of understanding in concerns to what was in the transcript going "No, no this is totally damning". It's probably going to be something the far left tries to run into the ground while moderates generally ignore.He is saying, that he thinks if the transcript is fully accurate this might burn out by next week due to being a nothingburger. I am not so sure, just look at how the Democrats have run with nothingburgers before.
I meant the moderate Democrats.Unfortunately the democrats went ahead with their impeachment demand. That's not really something the GOP can nor should ignore.
The file is apparently not a outright transcript as in word for word, its a summary of the talk. The word for word part is going to require the actual recording to be released. But the problematic part for Trump is:
The quid pro quo part may arguable be basically:
Trump talks about how the US has been good to Ukraine, the Ukrainian president agrees then goes on to say he'd like to buy more weapons. But then Trump says 'I would like you to do us a favor' and after that is basically back and forth about working with his lawyer and attorney general to dig up dirt on his opponents and start investigation into Biden's son.
Since when did quid pro quo become illegal in foreign dealings? Isn't that, well, every foreign deal? In fact, thats the "deal" part of the thing?
This seems awfully like saying doing foreign politics, or politics in general, is illegal.
it's not the "quid pro quo" in and of itself, it's that it's theoretically involving a domestic political rival.Since when did quid pro quo become illegal in foreign dealings? Isn't that, well, every foreign deal? In fact, thats the "deal" part of the thing?
...Project Veritas is real investigative journalism? Really? How many times have they been caught red handed with manipulating videos to suit their narratives? Are you saying that taking statements out of context, outright editing recordings to cut up statements and cut and paste different statements by those being recorded into where the person was saying something else is real journalism and should be lauded as long as it suits your right wing narrative and goals?
If this is the opinion of the people of this forum, then this forum is just as much of a right wing bubble as you lot portray SB as a left wing bubble.
Project Veritas is pretty much unrelated to discussions of Impeachment anyways like what this thread is actually about.
Oh. My. God. I need to find this. So badly.As for the subject of this thread, I listened to Glenn Beck read the entire transcript and it was glorious.
Here it is for your viewing pleasure.Oh. My. God. I need to find this. So badly.
I want Trump to Tweet out "the sky is blue"I am starting to hear far left democrats claim the transcript is either fake, edited, or incomplete...
Somebody needs to put Trump's face on R2-D2 in that screen.
This video shows a good summary of the bullshit spin the media has done for years now. I could not care less about what they have to say, I know that with their track record it is overblown or irrelevant. Russia falls out, doesn't work. Lets switch back to Racism. Doesn't work. Now lets go to Ukraine. It was Ukraine, not Russia, Trump colluded with. As Trump so succinctly put it, it's fake news.