"Start to Suspect" is the equivalent to "Assume they are looters based on race regardless of any evidence that can be put forward to the contrary"?
Except that's not the equivalent of what's going on here, thus you question is irrelevant.
"Start to Suspect" is the equivalent to "Assume they are looters based on race regardless of any evidence that can be put forward to the contrary"?
Except that's not the equivalent of what's going on here, thus you question is irrelevant.
So if someone said, "Any time I see Native Americans by the wreckage of a building, I assume they're looters," you'd be a-OK with that, right?
For consistencies sake?
"I will stop the invasion on our southern border and begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history."
Former President Donald Trump laid out his plan to stop the continuous onslaught of illegal immigrants who are rushing into the United States via the southern border, delivering remarks in both Fort Dodge, Iowa and Edinburg, Texas over the weekend.
"On my first day back in the White House, I will terminate every open-borders policy of the Biden administration. I will stop the invasion on our southern border and begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history," Trump declared in Iowa on Saturday.
Trump said he would invoke the Alien Enemies Act to help remove suspected gang members and drug dealers from the United States, and that he would end the concept of "birthright citizenship" by signing an executive order on his first day in office that would codify an interpretation of the 14th Amendment that does not guarantee citizenship solely on the basis of being born within the nation's borders.
The former president additionally plans to build more of a wall along the southern border and bring back measures such as Title 42, which had previously allowed the US to reject migrants who attempted to enter the US through the southern border during the pandemic.
Other initiatives backed by Trump include a plan to kick off an "ideological screening" for all immigrants, aiming to block "Christian-hating communists and Marxists" as well as "dangerous lunatics, haters, bigots and maniacs" from entering the United States. "Those who come to and join our country must love our country," Trump said, according to the New York Post.
Trump also proposed the deportation of immigrants in the US who have "jihadist sympathies" and to have immigration agents sent to "pro-jihadist demonstrations" in order to track such people.
The former president was endorsed by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) during his Texas visit, who proclaimed that America needs a president who will both "secure the border" and bring "law and order to the United States of America."
The way you format the history between you and Zeno is hard to follow.Except it is?
This below isn't comparable to "start to suspect"
I'm not sure how that isn't what went on here?Zeno Guy: Posts Picture that Shows Black People Sifting Through a Rubble Strewn House. Accuses them of looting.
Other Person: States they're salvaging their own belongings.
Zeno Guy: No they are looting. Those shoes don't belong to her.
Me: Posts Four Articles, One from the Washington Post, One From Local News, One From PBS, One from a British Tabloid, One From a Catholic News Site, and Used an Associated Press Photo. The articles state the name of the girl, the name of her Mother, and the name of the town and the street their home is on.
Zeno Guy/MrTatto: All Corporate Media Is Fake. Here is One Counter Example Graphic.
Me: What evidence can be given that they are not looters?
Zeno Guy: Unless I was there personally to interact with them in that moment, I will always consider those Black people looters.
Me: So your racist.
Zeno Guy: No of course not! But Black People Loot After Natural Disasters. They are Black, It is a Natural Disaster. Therefore they are looters.
Do you believe the people in those pictures are looters DarthOne? Why or why not?
I'm sure if we look up the Bureau of Justice Crime Statistics or Whatever we'll find Native Americans are actually probably more likely of being arrested for crimes like assault and sex crimes/rape. So some members tragically will probably consistently determine he's a sex crimes based felon unless they personally interact with him and be unwilling to accept any evidence to the contrary below that threshold. It's very sad.
I don’t think that’s important. I’m talking about board and executive positions. For example Toyota as long as the factories that make cars to sell in America are made in America I don’t care if the executives are American. Hell I’d prefer Japane executives to our own our 1 percent are blood sucking parasites.Trump lays out border plan to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants
Trump lays out border plan to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants
“I will stop the invasion on our southern border and begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”thepostmillennial.com
Trump needs to address the h1b fiasco as well. Any company who's staff is not at least 90% American citizens should be taxed as a foreign corporation. Might want to extend it to corporate boards and executive leadership too.
I mean, considering the rampant thievery that took place on the reservations I lived on, it would hardly be something for me to get upset over.So if someone said, "Any time I see Native Americans by the wreckage of a building, I assume they're looters," you'd be a-OK with that, right?
For consistencies sake?
I mean, considering the rampant thievery that took place on the reservations I lived on, it would hardly be something for me to get upset over.
But you also seem to have missed my actual response to his assumption, which is exactly what I would expect out of a bunch of leftists - you assume because I defend him that I agree with him. In fact I offered my own speculation, it's just that I also think that you're out of line.
> Will kick out foreigners for sweden if they get a criminal record
The part where you are putting the question to me, as if I was the one who asked it.Where did I say you agree with him?
I'm just calling it like I see it, based on my experience.Also, feels very silly for you to hope to political name calling as an insult.
I'm sure you'd have no trouble quoting some of them then.In any case - I don't call him racist simply for saying one thing. Its probably the hundredth or so time he's send something like this.
So, Sweden is the first to dip its toe in the “deportation” pool? Heh.
The “humanitarian superpower”, who went full speed ahead with progressive nonsense, is buckling. If it can happen there, it can happen anywhere lads.
Chin up.
I'll believe it when i see it. Sweden already has a problem with "failed asylum seekers" not being deported for various reasons. This could just make it a larger number.So, Sweden is the first to dip its toe in the “deportation” pool? Heh.
The “humanitarian superpower”, who went full speed ahead with progressive nonsense, is buckling. If it can happen there, it can happen anywhere lads.
Chin up.
fair.I'll believe it when i see it. Sweden already has a problem with "failed asylum seekers" not being deported for various reasons. This could just make it a larger number.
Sweden Has A Problem Sending Asylum Seekers Back
Can a system for sending rejected asylum seekers back to their home country ever be efficient and humane at the same time?www.forbes.com
So, Sweden is the first to dip its toe in the “deportation” pool? Heh.
As if third world countries report rape accurately.it might even drop from being the worlds rape capital (highest rape per capita in the world)
In the third world, is some muslim rapes your sister, it starts a blood fued and honor killing. There are consequences to committing rape.As if third world countries report rape accurately.
You should cut down on pulp novels. In the third world, what happens is that the family refuses to file a complaint, and then either kills the victim (it's called Honour Killing) or just turns her away.In the third world, is some muslim rapes your sister, it starts a blood fued and honor killing. There are consequences to committing rape
Oh there are spicier options.You should cut down on pulp novels. In the third world, what happens is that the family refuses to file a complaint, and then either kills the victim (it's called Honour Killing) or just turns her away.
That is, if anyone even cares. There's always a high chance that the rapist is a member of her own family or a random thug. In those cases, the lack of effective policing means that absolutely nothing can be done....except, of course, tormenting the victim.
The rapist was sentenced to life in prison.Or forced marriage to the rapist:
Anger as Pakistan court frees rapist after he agrees deal to marry his victim
Dawlat Khan had received a life sentence for the rape of a young deaf woman but a council of elders intervened to offer a compromisewww.theguardian.com
According to the article this an unprecedented case. Meaning they never before saw revenge rape in india.Oh there are spicier options.
Like revenge rape on the random thug's family's woman by own family's thugs:
India women: Arrests over 'revenge rape' in Jharkhand
A teenage girl in the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand has been raped in apparent revenge for an alleged assault on another woman, police say.www.bbc.com
The revenge rape thing even happens with tribal courts in Pakistan.The rapist was sentenced to life in prison.
While he was in prison the raped girl gave birth to his child and became a single mother. The girl's family agreed to a suggestion proposed by the village elders who then proposed a deal to the courts where he marries her and is contractually obligated to financially supports both her and the child in exchange for allowing him out of prison.
So his options was a lifetime in prison, or a lifetime of child support.
If she did not get pregnant he would have just had life in prison with no other options.
I am not saying that this kind of deal is a good thing.
But even the milder of punishments in pakistan is far more severe than mere community service like in sweden.
According to the article this an unprecedented case. Meaning they never before saw revenge rape in india.
Rapist 1 raped married woman.
Next day her husband (rapist 2) raped the sister of rapist 1.
sister went to police who immediately arrested all the men involved.
including the village chief which the police says enabled rapist 2.
The article has no follow-up about what actual punishment they will receive from the govt of india.
But india has a minimum sentence of 7 years in prison for rape and a maximum penalty of the death penalty for rapists.
These are massively higher penalties than the community service one gets in Sweden.
BBC notes that india has "a problem with gang rapes" and gives 2 examples that happened last year... which... is far far far less than the massive amounts of gang rapes that occur in Britain or Sweden.