Historical maps thread

WolfBear

Well-known member
The origins of significant figures in Art, Literature, Music and Science during three consecutive periods in Europe (1400-1600, 1600-1800 and 1800-1950):

6NXbMX7.png


From Charles Murray's book Human Accomplishment.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
The Christian percentage in the Ottoman-ruled Middle East in 1914:

24286344435_e4db1c3cd5_o.png


The Muslim percentage in the Ottoman-ruled Balkans in or around 1877:

balkans1877popc-gif.45393
 
Last edited:

WolfBear

Well-known member
An ethnic map of Bukovina (then exclusively a part of Romania, now split north-south between Ukraine and Romania) in 1930:

BSA.Image_Map_Bukovina_Ethnic_Distribution_1930-scaled.jpg


Bukovina was a relative multicultural paradise back then!
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Maps of the German, Polish, and Ruthenian (Ukrainian) languages in Central and Eastern Europe before the start of World War I:







a1360822a6031ff7a39886b87cce97ab3a46e7b4.webp


4f1a4c53c1a797dc47b8fca867dfd4d1cba51657.webp


7e9fd7c1e10cc347c5fc63c54d8a257b4a92f6eb.webp


The Polish map above appears to be biased since it does not consider Kashubians to be Poles. See this map of the 1900 Imperial German census results by ethnicity/language:

Sprachen_Deutsches_Reich_1900.png
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
@sillygoose You might be interested in this:

After the end of WWI, Hugo Preuss proposed to reorganize Germany into 14 states:


1252px-Deutsches_Reich_Preuss.svg.png


However, his proposal was never actually adopted by the new Weimar German government--though after the end of World War II, West Germany did adopt a similar idea.

@sillygoose What odds would you have placed on Prussia ever being broken up in the absence of the Nazis ever coming to power in Germany?

Interesting map of the Vietnam War:

81ZO8rei8rL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Short of a WW2 style fight to the end campaign in 1919 pretty close to zero. Bureaucratic inertia is powerful.

FWIW, I meant at any point in time up to the present-day. So, from 1918 to 2022. But if what you're saying applies to the entirety of this 104-year time period, then this would suck for Germany considering that this would mean that this would result in a rather lopsided German federation due to Prussia's sheer size and population, comparable to what would have happened had the Soviet Union survived and successfully reformed itself. In such a scenario, like Prussia in Germany, the Russian SFSR would have been extremely dominant in this reformed Soviet Union.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
As you can tell based on this ethnic map of Romania in 1930, the most literate peoples in Romania in 1930 were Germans and Magyars (Hungarians):

Romania_1930_ethnic_map_EN.png

You mean compare the 1930 ethnic map of Romania with the one for 1941, with different borders:

4f1c22fec8e3f4c137a5f4837a789da85ac10417.webp


The lack of Jews in the eastern territories in 1941 is due to them either being deported en masse to Transnistria or already being murdered en masse.
 

bintananth

behind a desk
You mean compare the 1930 ethnic map of Romania with the one for 1941, with different borders:

4f1c22fec8e3f4c137a5f4837a789da85ac10417.webp


The lack of Jews in the eastern territories in 1941 is due to them either being deported en masse to Transnistria or already being murdered en masse.
What you're saying makes me think that you dislike Jews.

Some of the things you've said about "non-white ancestry" makes me think that you think that everyone who isn't "lilly white" is dumber than a box of rocks.

That is not true.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
What you're saying makes me think that you dislike Jews.

Some of the things you've said about "non-white ancestry" makes me think that you think that everyone who isn't "lilly white" is dumber than a box of rocks.

That is not true.

I myself am Jewish (well, a quarter-Jewish but that's the quarter that I identify with the strongest), so accusing me of being an anti-Semite is just flat-out wrong.

And what exactly did I say about non-white ancestry? I never said that there were no smart non-white people, nor did I dispute that in the US, Asians are, on average, smarter than whites are:

 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Even East Asians in their home countries perform comparable to US whites on the PISA exam:

ELDth7gVAAAG9Nv.jpg:large


And some white countries perform comparable to US Hispanics (Ukraine, et cetera) and even US blacks (some Balkan countries, Moldova, Romania, et cetera). So, white countries have a wide variety in their academic performance.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I myself am Jewish (well, a quarter-Jewish but that's the quarter that I identify with the strongest), so accusing me of being an anti-Semite is just flat-out wrong.

And what exactly did I say about non-white ancestry? I never said that there were no smart non-white people, nor did I dispute that in the US, Asians are, on average, smarter than whites are:


I simply mentioned Jews in the context of the 1941 map because it's clear that some parts of Romania, such as Moldova, have much less Jews on the map for 1941 than they had on the map for 1930. I was trying to provide an explanation for this.

Anyway:

Counties in the US where minorities are highly represented:


20190905_Metro_Frey_Maps.png


White: None
Light blue: Native Americans and Alaskan Natives
Dark green: Hispanics
Light green: Two or more minorities
Brown: Blacks
Grey: No data
Blue: Asians, Native Hawaiians, and other Pacific Islanders
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
The origins of significant figures in Art, Literature, Music and Science during three consecutive periods in Europe (1400-1600, 1600-1800 and 1800-1950):

6NXbMX7.png


From Charles Murray's book Human Accomplishment.

Here's the same data for the United States from the very same book:

943ec8d5f1fe0e34be4def552f155d731b5094f9.webp


The Southern US isn't very heavy on human accomplishment, unfortunately. :( Well, at least not the truly transformational kinds of human accomplishments that involve art, music, literature, science, philosophy, et cetera.
 
Last edited:

WolfBear

Well-known member
@sillygoose You might be interested in this map:

CBbke77WcAAJqW-.jpg


It shows World War II deaths by country and by category (soldiers, civilians, Jews, and Diaspora Germans). It's in German, but I'm presuming that you can still read it.

This map shows just how harsh and brutal World War II was for the Soviet Union.
 
Last edited:

sillygoose

Well-known member
@sillygoose You might be interested in this map:

CBbke77WcAAJqW-.jpg


It shows World War II deaths by country and by category (soldiers, civilians, Jews, and Diaspora Germans). It's in German, but I'm presuming that you can still read it.

This map shows just how harsh and brutal World War II was for the Soviet Union.
I'd like to know where they got their data from, because it seems they undercounted German losses by quite a bit and the Russians would dispute what the Germans claimed about Soviet casualties.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I'd like to know where they got their data from, because it seems they undercounted German losses by quite a bit and the Russians would dispute what the Germans claimed about Soviet casualties.

Yeah, I'd like to find that out as well. If I can actually find the original source of this map, I would let you know. German military casualties in World War II should be in the 5-6 million range, no? As for the Soviet casualties, didn't Soviet experts themselves in the post-Cold War period say something along the lines of 9-11 million Soviet military casualties and 16-18 million Soviet civilian casualties?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top