WTF are you talking about? Biden supports Israel, are you high? Again Israel has supporters who are both "conservative" and leftist. Palestine has leftists and very very few conservatives, and quite a few racists who hate Jews.
The neutrals are the ones that are conservative.
My point is that as far as the political heavy hitters go in US politics, there's only more and less pro-Israel side, hence, what other side.
So if a hypothetical someone supports gay rights, gay marriage, forcing Christians to bake the cake, hell stripping Church's of their tax exempt status if they don't perform gay marriages. But they are against trannies. That person is not a leftist to you?
To me, still is. But to many leftists, it's a heretic. And of course it's not your hypothetical we are talking about, we are talking about associationg with the great enemy, the dreadful "far right", that's a lot more than a little heresy.
You obviously don't know what leftism is.
Yeah you don't know what a leftist or a commie is most of the world is not that.
Again people are laughing at you, you don't even know what a leftist is, you think a democrat from 10 years ago is not a leftist.
Some weren't, and you are the one specializing in not knowing things around here.
Yes please tell me why I should be monitored because I don't suck the MIC dick on every foreign war?
Because you have radical yet utterly nonsensical ideas about policy domestic and foreign, which is worse than what you want to monitor people over.
Please if someone is religiously worshipping a foreign nation that is a security threat. In the past we looked closely at Catholics because we thought they could be influenced by the Pope.
Now we have dumb celebrities from many places in numbers far greater than popes ever were.
Tell me if some group of people were saying China is a holy nation chosen by God, don't you think they might be a security threat?
If they are people of influence, sure, but less than people who quietly take money from it.
Usually that fringe is not very influential though.
Neo cons were in power and did not prevent the rapefugees.
Most politicians in most countries didn't. But they didn't actively support them either, unlike some.
Hell they did bring in quite a few of them with their wars. We did not have this problem before the global war on terror.
Yes you did, again you are actively refusing to know inconvenient facts that would stop you from signing up to leftist kneejerks about muh neocons and muh wars, indistinguishable from Code Pink grade leftist bullshit. Fucking Castro kinda did a test run of classic "demographic warfare" with emptying prisons and asylums but lacked the right scale to get major effects.
You are hella biased you just want America to stay so you can dickride us for protection from big bad Russia.
You want to ignore facts that make foreign policy too complicated for some fringe ideological "big brain" club meant for people who struggle to understand the insane web of world influences, military calculus and economics so they can feel better about themselves if they proudly declare that it's unimportant and the best option is to not play, covering that with larping as turboswiss.
That's besides deluding yourself that any meaningful number of your compatriots want to join in your delusional fantasy of turning USA into some weirdo theocracy with confessionalist politics.
Do you think it's impossible for there to be a draft?
Not about the scenario you presented. Maybe if China really gets lucky with its ambitions and gets a good foothold in Canada or Central America, or something similarly bad.
Otherwise, in such a huge war, what's the fucking point, even war economy is more likely - can't wage war by ocean with more conscripts than you have ships to move and supply them with, and building warships is slow, while the existing ones are already insufficient to send out most of the existing non-conscript army at the same time against an opponent so strong as to necessitate that.