TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
I see the silver-lining in this. Some of them likely argued for censorship or banning on anyone who disagrees with them, now they will learn how said behavior can affect them severely as well by the pockets and by extension, the rest of their long lives. In turn we could see much less cosmopolitan liberal-progressive academicians and the like since pro-Palestianian endorsements coincide with BLM, LGBTQ and immigration issues intertwine quite often, accompanied by a side dish of mental gymnastics.Well, students at Harvard and other universities are finding that out.
I am baffled they didn't do a simple reasoning like two plus two, both of them. Said Jewish, pro-Jewish or philo-Semitic/pro-Zionist donors for not "seeing" who they were dropping money for and for the pro-Palestinian students and university institutions that the hands that feeds them could get really pissed if got bitten.Firms and companies have openly stated they're blackballing the students supporting Palestine from their industries before they've even graduated, and a lot of these companies hire workers while they're still in education. That's basically a career abortion, not a career-killer.
You know why? The business owners, founders, board members, and CEO's are Jewish or pro-Israel.
The universities themselves are in trouble because a lot of their richest donors are, you guessed it, fucking Jewish. They've stopped their donations entirely.
The regret is setting in for supporting Palestine, and they're beginning to panic, especially the students.
On dropping the donations entirely I want to see actual proof of that. Then there's the issue on who,when and on what exactly they stopped their donations.