Prince Ire
Section XIII
Do you also think acknowledging Algerian nationhood means "providing rhetorical cover" for the Isly Massacre of pied-noirs? Palestinians are a nation, see themselves as a nation, and act like a nation. Hamas murdering civilians doesn't change that, no matter how many appeals to emotion you make.Yes, keep providing rhetorical cover to Hamas days after they undertook the slaughter of Jews on a scale not seen sense the Holocaust.
Yes, Ukraine is a relatively recent nation. It's still a nation. All nationhoods are constructed, not natural occurrences, whether that construction is done by external powers or the middle classes of the group who are declaring themselves a nation.In a lot of the ways that matter, there wasn't a "Ukrainian" nationality in 1910, but the Soviet apparatchiks in Moskow got up to a lot of shenanigans with language barriers and minor regional differences to divert unrest to local infighting instead of revolts against the USSR. Historically, the Cossacks make tracing the concept of "Ukrainian" into the Tsarist period a hopeless clusterfuck.
And because of aforementioned relocations, steppe nomad migrations (Crimean Khanate, lol), and more than a little action from Scandinavians ("the Rus"), calling any nation in the area a clear ethnicity is a bold-faced fucking lie. You're not getting clear haplogroups with any meaningful relation to modern borders there. Way too much traveling dickery going around, rarely entirely consensual.
There's a reason we're called "The United States of America": The bedrock of the federal government is actually a coalition much like the EU (our current Constitution is actually the replacement to the comparably-toothless Articles of Confederation). With how intense the regional differences are, we're at least three nations in a trenchcoat. Had a civil war over it, in fact.
Meanwhile, you're trying to excuse a "nation" defined chiefly by indoctrination from genocidal warmongers as no different from a secession movement that took over a century plus the bloodiest-to-us war in our history to start seriously looking at ourselves as one cultural body, or from exploiting mild language barriers and the narcissism of small differences to outsource oppression to local strongmen in a process that forces a lot more codification of regional habits than remotely natural.
Ukraine is a quirk of imperial retention policies, the United States is the long-term aftermath of Colonial policy breakdown, while Palestine is the present catspaw for the Arabs attempting to exterminate the Jews. They are still, right this second, as the actions responsible for this thread show, defined primarily by refusing to let the loss in 1948 go.
Also, you vastly overestimate the amount of regional difference in the US. The 13 colonies weren't that different from each other. Just compare them to say, France at the same time, where the majority of the population couldn't speak what we'd recognize as French. The fact that the South hasn't tried seceding since 1865 shows that they aren't a separate national identity. Genuine national uprisings aren't one and done affairs barring genocide.
And literally none of that changes that Palestine is a nation. And yes, nationalists tend to not let go of defeats, as studying nationalist rebels and nationalist terrorists throughout the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries should show. Nationalist rebels and nationalist terrorists also frequently engaged in massacres and mass murders of civilians throughout that time period too.
Last edited: