United States George Floyd Protests, Reactions and Riots

CarlManvers2019

WHAT DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY HAIR!?!?
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
12,642
Location
Philippines
Nationalism is still a dirty word Carl.
Civic Nationalism

Trump’s ironically got a very diverse fanbase of supporters ATM

And if anything, I may not be American or White, but I realize that things like the “Globalist ideal“ or being a “Citizen of the World” is Star Trek BS in a world without even said technology to begin with that acts as if ONLY it has a monopoly on tolerance and unity
 

CarlManvers2019

WHAT DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY HAIR!?!?
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
12,642
Location
Philippines
@Bacle
They’re already doing stuff like targeting Cuban communities, whom I’m pretty sure are even told they’re millionaires fleeing Cuba even if they were dirt poor even back in Cuba

They even destroy the black communities homes and businesses

This won’t be a race war

But the other side will act as if it’s one even if they face resistance from Koreans on Rooftops defending their livelihoods

Only way it'd be a "Race War" is if thpse comprising the Far Left and your resident "RINOs" turn out to all be lizardmen/serpentmen

And if so, say "Ka Nama Kaa Lajerama" and you may get called an Ophidiophobic when they transform
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Reaction score
3,327
@Bacle
This won’t be a race war

But the other side will act as if it’s one even if they face resistance from Koreans on Rooftops defending their livelihoods

Only way it'd be a "Race War" is if thpse comprising the Far Left and your resident "RINOs" turn out to all be lizardmen/serpentmen

And if so, say "Ka Nama Kaa Lajerama" and you may get called an Ophidiophobic when they transform
I fully agree that there will be no race war. POL and their talk of race war has always been a cope.

White people of now are too pathetic.
 

CarlManvers2019

WHAT DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY HAIR!?!?
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
12,642
Location
Philippines
I fully agree that there will be no race war. POL and their talk of race war has always been a cope.

White people of now are too pathetic.
That we can agree on

Honestly, whenever I think "white people" I'm somehow thinking of the civvies from Demolition Man....even Simon Phoenix can't help but look down on them with actual disgust

Hell, I think even Isaac Asimov who was a Democrat would think of people as being sort of like the Spacers from his own works and for all their flaws the Settlers actually reproduced and had more ambition and were more likely to leave their homes to explore elsewhere
 

TyrantTriumphant

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Reaction score
295
Stop talking about "white people" like we're a monolithic bloc. While there are plenty useless and/or weak people who happen to be white, there are still plenty of us who willing to fight for western civilization.

The same is true for black people, hispanics, or any other race. There have always been good and bad members of every race and that will never change.

Everyone needs to stop focusing on race and start focusing on culture and religion.

Blathering on about race only helps the left and those losers on pol/.
 

CarlManvers2019

WHAT DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY HAIR!?!?
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
12,642
Location
Philippines
Stop talking about "white people" like we're a monolithic bloc. While there are plenty useless and/or weak people who happen to be white, there are still plenty of us who willing to fight for western civilization.
Okay, honestly I forget the majority of white dudes aren't all Far Left at times


Say, anybody think there will be more masks from now on? There's such a thing as being too obvious with your identity
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Reaction score
3,327
Stop talking about "white people" like we're a monolithic bloc. While there are plenty useless and/or weak people who happen to be white, there are still plenty of us who willing to fight for western civilization.

The same is true for black people, hispanics, or any other race. There have always been good and bad members of every race and that will never change.

Everyone needs to stop focusing on race and start focusing on culture and religion.
We talk about white people cause white people is the source of leftism infection that has spread across the world. Its white people and their white guilt and feminism that has devastated the rest of the world.

if white people kept their own insanity to themselves instead of exporting it worldwide? I would be far more quiet.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling accountant
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Reaction score
8,054
Location
Slovenija
Why do young white women engage in this behavior? Like I do not fucking understand it.
Virtue signaling is goal and means for these people. Women are somewhat more susceptible to conformity über alles thinking, so when media tells them they their skin color is evil and that they need to endlessly flagelate to cleanse themselves of their sin, they follow while men follow in turn, hoping to get laid. This is why most of advertising is targeted at women these days - convince them and and they will drag men along by the balls.
 

CarlManvers2019

WHAT DID YOU SAY ABOUT MY HAIR!?!?
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
12,642
Location
Philippines
Virtue signaling is goal and means for these people. Women are somewhat more susceptible to conformity über alles thinking, so when media tells them they their skin color is evil and that they need to endlessly flagelate to cleanse themselves of their sin, they follow while men follow in turn, hoping to get laid. This is why most of advertising is targeted at women these days - convince them and and they will drag men along by the balls.
You know, I heard once that women are actually more likely to do “psychological” bullying rather than simply the more physical stuff compared to males

If anything, psychological attacks are in a way MUCH more effective and can be “hidden” better

Stuff like the riots are in a way a mix of both psychological AND physical bullying
 

Harlock

Hermit
Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Reaction score
4,449
Ugh, renaming David Hume Tower after George - fucking - Lloyd utterly disgusts me. One of the fathers of the Enlightenment, a Scotsman who actually attended the University of Edinburgh almost three hundred years ago, and he is replaced by a scum bag criminal who OD‘d and had never even been to Scotland or the UK, much less contributed to the world in any positive way. The world is going insane. When Western civilization collapses, we will have deserved it. 🤮
They didn't, it just reverted to its address, 40 George Square. No idea which George that square is named for but as it is decades if not centuries old it wasn't that one :)

I don't care, the name was changed due to Hume's racial attitudes. Which was explicitly stated by the college.
Its a concrete tower block living accommodation, like something from a Soviet state. If they want it they can have it :p Its not a place of learning or education, now I think its weak to change the name but in the grand scheme of things its nothing. Not a hill to die on.

Yes, I'm aware of its origins. The point is in the comparison. Social liberalism is a disease that weakens a person and a society much like Auto Immune Deficiency Syndrome. You could argue social liberalism has the same effect on society that AIDS does on the body.

Though if you insist, I'll refrain. You didn't refute the essence of my argument though.
What? Don't be retarded :p Social liberalism is awesome. If you want to strike Communism of the far left sure thing, but now you are going for moderate centre left as a poison. You are either badly informed or just plain insane.
 

Tryglaw

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Reaction score
1,638
Thats the hilarity of it all. Atheists and so called enlightened people destroyed the Christian church promising an age of rationalism and what we got instead is a secular religion that is even more hardened then Christianity.
It should be added the Church of Rome had done a lot to destroy itself - from good old simony and corruption, to modern issues like coverups of paedophillia of priests.

Jokes like:
"How do you call a dating app for priests? Kinder."
"How do you call a priest moved between parishes? Sex tourism."
Didn't appear out of the blue.

Homosexuality becoming socially acceptable also removed a large incentive for young gays to join.

What we are experiencing is essentially the female psyche writ large, we are living in a female frame. Society used to be ordered on a male frame, which values things such as justice, fairness (of opportunity), tribalism, and a general trend of liberty over security.

Women are basically wired to be in a constant state of semi-panic when it comes to their security. This is normal; the vast majority of human evolution occurred during a time when a woman's entire reality could be erased by a conquering tribe in a matter of hours. They have a pathological need for security for themselves and their child. Feminized men share the same mindset, they are firmly in the female frame. You occasionally get some women who subscribe to the male frame, but they are increasingly rare nowadays.

Women basically want a 100% guarantee that there is a safety net for them and their children. They need looking after financially. It in written in their genetic make-up. When you extrapolate this onto society, you get the current clown world we live in today. There is no hierarchy, everyone is equal and a de facto sisterhood of care is applied to all manner of degenerate and unorthodox groups. Emotions trump reason. Rape is the highest crime of all. And men need to be endlessly and completely subdued; they cannot risk giving men power over them and their children ever again. It's primal fear.

Daddy government is more reliable than men. I don't need to perform for daddy government; no matter how ugly, fat, or unappealing I am, daddy government will give me and my children money and feminized society won't judge me for my poor choices. This is evidence that for society to function, it needs to be founded on a male frame. We need to build a patriarchy from the ashes. There can be no female emancipation and "women's lib" without what we are seeing today play out.
I supposed this is an aspect of both evolutionary psychology and how reproductive strategies are shaped by physiology.

Men can successfully reproduce by doing the deed and moving on. In fact, from an evolutionary perspective, moving on to impregnate more and more separate females means you win big in the game of natural selection; the more genetically unrelated and diverse offspring you produce, the more widely your genes are present in subsequent generations, the more successful you are.

And men can reproduce in parallel with multiple females independently of each other, while for females the exact opposite is the case, as they can't carry several pregnancies at the same time, and can carry only so many pregnancies during their reproductive years. A man can have thousands of children, a woman can not.

Women however can only successfully reproduce by having a steady and reliable caretaker / provider, both during the pregnancy and at least during the early (several) years of offspring's life, at least until the child is grown enough to be (semi-)independent. A pregnant woman is not going to chase a mammoth down, nor can she leave the newborn child to go hunt or gather.

This reality of reproductive necessity creates a strong incentive, if not imperative, to secure a provider by any means necessary. In modern society, said society at large has been roped into this, and yes, a society is more convenient as the female needs to take care of male for him to want to stay with her instead of leaving if the relationship proves more trouble then it's worth. Social support is just one way street however, nanny state won't pack it's things and leave without even paying alimony.

The side effect of this however is, as is always the case, gaming the system by females who don't need to work (I mean both work for a living and work to make a relationship with a man work out) and support themselves at expense of the society.
The rise of Karen...
 

Lord Invictus

Never Forget Injustice.
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Reaction score
7,511
I would say that a lot of the women protesting/shouting anti cop slogans/etc... are taking out their anti male rebelliousness on the state itself. Or more explicitly the police.

When the government becomes father and husband-then eventually feminist activism turns against that(or at least its most masculine elements) as well.

But I concur, women’s psychology is a major problem for modern society. Well really human psychology is. We aren’t suited to this post industrial comfortable existence.
 

Tryglaw

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Reaction score
1,638
But I concur, women’s psychology is a major problem for modern society. Well really human psychology is. We aren’t suited to this post industrial comfortable existence.
I think it's a side effect of the social safety net growing too large. Now I'm all in favour of hiving a helping hand to those who fell on hard times due to no fault of their own, but gaming the system, and screwing up the rules of the system by expanding it's scope to get votes and win elections, has led to a situation where a lot of people who get support shouldn't.

The society should not encourage and support conducts that are irresponsible and often self-destructive / harmful to society at large.
 

ShieldWife

Marchioness
Joined
Aug 21, 2019
Reaction score
3,551
They didn't, it just reverted to its address, 40 George Square. No idea which George that square is named for but as it is decades if not centuries old it wasn't that one :)
Huh, you're right, I stand corrected. I kind of think that the various articles floating around the net mentioned George Floyd and then didn't explain the reasons for the new name, almost as to hint that it was renamed after George Floyd. I looked it up, George Square dates back to 1766, so presumably it was named after King George III who was the king of Great Britain at the time.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Reaction score
6,659
We talk about white people cause white people is the source of leftism infection that has spread across the world. Its white people and their white guilt and feminism that has devastated the rest of the world.

if white people kept their own insanity to themselves instead of exporting it worldwide? I would be far more quiet.
You know, we get enough anti-white racism from the left. There's no need for you to add your own racist attitudes to the mix.
 

ShieldWife

Marchioness
Joined
Aug 21, 2019
Reaction score
3,551
Do white people spread leftism around the world? What would be an example of that? It seems like white people are the primary targets of leftist ire. Really, left versus right as we use the terms are important within the context of Western civilization, so primarily white nations. Outside of the West, the definitions break down. Are communist China and North Korean nations leftist? Kinda, but did white people force communism on them?

I would agree, though, that a particularly vicious form of leftism is common to white people and rare to non-whites, which is ironically self hating leftism.
 
Top Bottom