mrttao
Well-known member
There is no IF
huge portion of population are forbidden from speaking.
and very bad things are happening.
Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
huge portion of population are forbidden from speaking.
and very bad things are happening.
Heh heh, you're not wrong...
*Nervous laughter*
mrttao
Well-known member
Two Chicago Youths Who Caused Crash that Killed Baby Charged with MISDEMEANORS
Two Chicago youths who stole a vehicle that crashed into a pickup truck, killing a 6-month-old baby while injuring three others, will only be charged with misde
www.dailyfetched.com
infuriating
"Chicago Youths".Two Chicago Youths Who Caused Crash that Killed Baby Charged with MISDEMEANORS
Two Chicago youths who stole a vehicle that crashed into a pickup truck, killing a 6-month-old baby while injuring three others, will only be charged with misde
infuriating
Man, the endless euphemisms for black people just never stops, now does it?
I still prefer "Lunchtime Rowdies" and "Seasoning Americans".
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
I am blessed I got used being a social reject in middle and high school so the pressure of being an outcast wasn't on me. It did get difficult until September 2022 since my Turkish friend (who got vaxxed to have the oppurtunity of studying abroad, where we met) and I were travelling to Italy , it was a BIG annoyance everything, one time in a restaurant her vax resulted EXPIRED despite the TURKISH CERTIFICATE DID NOT HAVE ONE, thankfully the morons allowed us to eat because they LIKELY realized that if she couldn't eat there I WOULDN'T AS WELL.
Her sis wasn't so lucky since she was a pharmacist and HAD TO TAKE 4 DOSES (or something like that) and the only reason Turkey stopped with the bullshit is because Turks demonstrated they were fucking furious.
Italy lagged on until September. MUCH longer than Turkey.
Portugal was returning to NORMAL earlier than those two.
DarthOne
☦️
Yinko
Well-known member
What's the saying? "Men care about a woman's past, women care about a man's future", not a lot of future with a guy who has terminal cancer. Probably was like the good count said, she pulled out her investment. Even if that isn't the case, she's very much not interested in anyone other than herself.
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
Blasterbot
Well-known member
That is a dangerous game to play in LA. loads of homeless people have very serious mental issues and drug abuse problems. guy could have ended up dead over that.
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
And nobody (knowing the context) will bat an eye or shed a tear.
What a reprehensible cunt of a human.
Spend what time you can with him and your mother -- there's a very good chance they're going to be six foot under in less than five years.
I wish I could say I were being dramatic or using hyperbole, but given everything that's coming out about the Vaxx and its boosters...
bintananth
behind a desk
Lucifer has a spot in hell reserved for that asshole.
bintananth
behind a desk
I'm at a loss for words ...
www.nbcnews.com
5 charged after Indiana special needs student, 7, is forced to eat his own vomit with a spoon, police say
The charges stem from an incident in February at Brown Elementary School in Brownsburg.
www.nbcnews.com
mrttao
Well-known member
Wow. just wow.I'm at a loss for words ...
5 charged after Indiana special needs student, 7, is forced to eat his own vomit with a spoon, police say
The charges stem from an incident in February at Brown Elementary School in Brownsburg.
... also, they "started the process" of firing 2 of those.
but they need to wait until next month's board meeting to start the the process of firing the other 3.
crazy how powerful teacher's unions are. And how evil too, they will protect teachers no matter how justified the firing is
Blasterbot
Well-known member
fuck the teachers union. if they want to defend these assholes they can get spoon fed vomit too.
Yinko
Well-known member
After people caught on to the Restrict Act things seemed to have settled down. Birds were chirping, wind was blowing, everything was at peace. There was even a bi-partisan bill put forward to get children off social media, who could be against that?
Wait one minute!
A sensible sounding bi-partisan bill? This can only mean one thing... a trap! Doesn't help that it would be enforced by the Department of Commerce, as with the Restrict Act. Nothing suspicious about that. /s
So I looked into it and found this.
Full Bill Here
This is the only press-release by any of the listed senators, all of them have the same article listed on their web-pages but nothing else.
www.schatz.senate.gov
EDIT-
I was thinking about this more, specifically "why the hard-on for the Dep. of Commerce"? Well:
This was also a pet idea of the Obama administration.
Social Security
NASA
The National Census
The vaguely defined Industry and Security Bureau
The Patent Office
The various National Weather Services
NIST (which holds all government patents, certifies voting machines and develops wide-scale identification)
It honestly seems as if the Dep. of Commerce is already horrifically bloated with over-reach and deeply invested in IDing the public. Not too surprising though, since the entire remit of the Federal Government is that "everything is interstate commerce".
Wait one minute!
A sensible sounding bi-partisan bill? This can only mean one thing... a trap! Doesn't help that it would be enforced by the Department of Commerce, as with the Restrict Act. Nothing suspicious about that. /sSo I looked into it and found this.
It's digital ID, the whole thing is just a way to get digital ID passed through under the table. Used as a mandatory method of creating user accounts, and controlled by the iron first of the Department of Commerce.
Full Bill Here
This is the only press-release by any of the listed senators, all of them have the same article listed on their web-pages but nothing else.
Schatz, Cotton, Murphy, Britt Introduce Bipartisan Legislation To Help Protect Kids From Harmful Impacts Of Social Media | U.S. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Brian Schatz (D-Hawai‘i), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.),...
www.schatz.senate.gov
EDIT-
I was thinking about this more, specifically "why the hard-on for the Dep. of Commerce"? Well:
It seems that under the model of Hoover, any Command Economy would flow through the Dep. of Commerce as some kind of grand secretariat. Now, Hoover didn't want socialism, but he did want big government and top-down control.Herbert Hoover as secretary of commerce[edit]
Herbert Hoover was appointed Secretary of Commerce in 1921 by then-President Warren G. Harding.[11] Hoover was, by far, the most active secretary in the history of the department until the end of his position in 1928.[12]
Assistants William McCracken (left) and Walter Drake (right) with Secretary Hoover (center)
After his election as president in 1920, Warren G. Harding rewarded Hoover for his support, offering to appoint him as either Secretary of the Interior or Secretary of Commerce. Secretary of Commerce was considered a minor Cabinet post, with limited and vaguely defined responsibilities, but Hoover, emphasizing his identity as a businessman, accepted the position. In sharp contrast to the Interior Department, there were no scandals at Commerce.[13]
Hoover envisioned the Commerce Department as the hub of the nation's growth and stability.[14] His experience mobilizing the war-time economy convinced him that the federal government could promote efficiency by eliminating waste, increasing production, encouraging the adoption of data-based practices, investing in infrastructure, and conserving natural resources. Contemporaries described Hoover's approach as a "third alternative" between "unrestrained capitalism" and socialism, which was becoming increasingly popular in Europe.[15] Hoover sought to foster a balance among labor, capital, and the government, and for this he has been variously labeled a "corporatist" or an associationalist.[16]
Hoover demanded, and received, authority to coordinate economic affairs throughout the government. He created many sub-departments and committees, overseeing and regulating everything from manufacturing statistics to air travel. In some instances he "seized" control of responsibilities from other Cabinet departments when he deemed that they were not carrying out their responsibilities well; some began referring to him as the "Secretary of Commerce and Under-Secretary of all other departments."[14] In response to the Depression of 1920–21, he convinced Harding to assemble a presidential commission on unemployment, which encouraged local governments to engage in countercyclical infrastructure spending. He endorsed much of Mellon's tax reduction program, but favored a more progressive tax system and opposed the treasury secretary's efforts to eliminate the estate tax.[17]
This was also a pet idea of the Obama administration.
If you look at the current list of departments and what they have a large say in, or outright control you have:
Social Security
NASA
The National Census
The vaguely defined Industry and Security Bureau
The Patent Office
The various National Weather Services
NIST (which holds all government patents, certifies voting machines and develops wide-scale identification)
It honestly seems as if the Dep. of Commerce is already horrifically bloated with over-reach and deeply invested in IDing the public. Not too surprising though, since the entire remit of the Federal Government is that "everything is interstate commerce".
Last edited:
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
And theirs is the one of love.
I am a lapsed Catholic but I don't approve of this behaviour despite I curse at the current Pope.
Also apparently Pope John Paul II has been alluded to be a pedo recently.