Five minutes of hate news

Reader mode
Aldarion said:
Click to expand...

The mask came off in the last ten years or so.

Tendencies were always there, but it was basically hidden and kept out of sight (especially when a Black family member began to date a White chick).

I wrote a post on here years ago about how White Americans were basically embracing Black Americans as just Americans and not Black Americans, that racism towards Blacks was at it lowest ever, and people didn't care about skin colour... And then when guards were lowered and trust at its highest, the Black population collectively stabbed you all in the back, and they've shown themselves to be just as vile as the stereotypical White racist in the 20th.

What's just as bad? Black people who spoke out against this stupidity are considered persona non grata by their own friends, communities, and families ("Uncle Toms", "Oreos", et cetera).

The media and government covers up or doesn't report on Black-on-White or Black-on-Everyone Else crime, including murders, thefts, and rapes. And people are, ironically, noticing.

Now? Prejudice against Black people is on the rise, racism against them is spiking, and people who once didn't care about skin colour are now thinking, "hey, looks like my racist great-great grandfathers and grandmothers were right about Black people causing shit")... And idiots on the Left and in government are asking "why are the victimized population suddenly becoming more and more hostile towards the other part of the population who are raping, thieving from, and murdering them?".

Whites were basically brainwashed over the last half-century to lower their guards and accept people blindly, and now we're seeing the effects since everyone else was taught to hate and villainize Whites.
 


So CNN hit a new low in intellectual dishonesty by airing a documentary that basically says it's okay to embrace political violence, because that was how America was founded, and because really the majority of violence comes from the right wing anyway. :cautious:
 
Jormungandr said:
And then when guards were lowered and trust at its highest, the Black population collectively stabbed you all in the back, and they've shown themselves to be just as vile as the stereotypical White racist in the 20th.
Click to expand...
What's especially terrible is that there's a bounty of statistics that this happened because they weren't bad actors at any major scale when the Civil Rights movement started but the "anti-poverty" movement ruined the black community just in time for shitlibs to throw themselves upon the freshly-lit fires of the ghetto.
 
PsihoKekec said:
It's not just black people throwing money at the killer, most likely most of the money is from white liberals, indulgence for their internalised sin of white guilt, sin that will never be forgiven.
Click to expand...

Well, considering the killer's family has spent most of the "defense" money on a new mansion and car, they probably realize their kid is going to prison.

My question is, doesn't that fall under the legal definition of fraud? The money was specifically raised for his defense and legal fees, how can they turn around and use it on a house and car?
 
Last edited:
Jormungandr said:
Honestly, if it came down to it, I'd rather have Leftards "humanely euthanized" than dogs and cats for their polluting "carbon emissions".

Yes, I am saying I prioritize cats' and dogs' lives over those humans who hate who/what I am to the point where they want to see me either arrested, dead, or subsumed for the "crime" of just being me (White, straight, male, not on the Left, et cetera).

I love animals. I don't like people; especially people who hate me for their own twisted reasons.
Click to expand...
Agreed. At least if a dog or a cat attacks you, it is doing so based on instinct, whereas when a human does it it usually involves some bullshit political reason or rationale.
 
Morphic Tide said:
What's especially terrible is that there's a bounty of statistics that this happened because they weren't bad actors at any major scale when the Civil Rights movement started but the "anti-poverty" movement ruined the black community just in time for shitlibs to throw themselves upon the freshly-lit fires of the ghetto.
Click to expand...
The black community of the fifties and sixties was very different from what we have now. Respectable, clean cut, family oriented.

Then Johnson and his Great Society kicked the black male from the family and it’s been all down hill since.
 
StormEagle said:
The black community of the fifties and sixties was very different from what we have now. Respectable, clean cut, family oriented.

Then Johnson and his Great Society kicked the black male from the family and it’s been all down hill since.
Click to expand...
went from 1/9 blacks growing without a father to 1/9 blacks growing with a father.
unsurprisingly, we are seeing fatherless behavior

that said, I am starting to suspect that we might be having nostalgia tinted glasses for the blacks of the 50s.

a lot of it comes from historical revisionists constantly being caught.
 
The Whispering Monk said:
Not really, there was a higher proportion of married black families then, than there were married white families.
Click to expand...
1. from the statistics I have seen they still had higher rate of fatherlessness there.

2. not what I was referring to. I was referring to the high rate of violent crimes.

Liberals today love to dismiss all the black crime statistics from back in the day when blacks did have stable homes with fathers as "just racists making up stories". but even when THEY cherry pick examples they give cases where it was blatantly true.

like that story where the son of will smith played the "poor innocent black kid that was executed at 14 for a crime he did not commit". which was utter nonsense.

He raped and murdered an 11 year and 7 year old girls. Everyone in the school said he was a total psycho. And the police didn't randomly pick him up, instead he was turned in by his own family who contacted the police and told the police he did it. His family was split between those who insisted he was innocent and those who testified against him.

Also, despite being 14 he was very mature, looking like a fully grown thug.

Some liberal activist judge reopened the case and decladed him "not guilty. because of a mistrial. because they judged him as an adult and he was only 14".
 
As a MGTOW-leaning Men's Rights Activist it honestly pisses me off - the systemic racist misandry against Black men. Now we're experiencing blowback of epic proportions - wherein a Black Man who are CLEARLY GUILTY OF FUCKING MURDER GOT OFF SCOT FREE. This has opened pandora's box. I fear this anger toward Black Men is going to be expanded to ALL men. Remember: modern day feminism calls for the genocide of the male sex. It must not be underestimated how fucking ugly this shit is going to get
 
Carrot of Truth said:
This is why there never will be a successful multicultural nation. This idea that "diversity" is a good thing is childish thinking at its most dangerous.
Click to expand...
It's that "multicultural nation" is in several senses oxymoronic, as "nations" are definitionally cohesive people groups. Multicultural states have a very long, rich, and generally successful history with the caveat that we typically call these "empires", where a ruling culture that can easily be quite a minority subordinates others within its territories in foreign affairs.
 
IRS took off its website for "planned maintainence" on tax day. From april 14th to april 15th it was impossible to pay your taxes online.
Making it impossible for people to pay their taxes on time unless they paid in advance, whether online or via mailing a check days in advance.

No extension, instead they remind people that their taxes are still due on the 15th no matter what.
So now many many people are going to have to pay late fees.

notthebee.com

The IRS scheduled maintenance of their payment system on Tax Day, said payment was still due regardless

Just a reminder that you don't hate the Internal Revenue Service enough 👇
notthebee.com notthebee.com
 
Morphic Tide said:
It's that "multicultural nation" is in several senses oxymoronic, as "nations" are definitionally cohesive people groups. Multicultural states have a very long, rich, and generally successful history with the caveat that we typically call these "empires", where a ruling culture that can easily be quite a minority subordinates others within its territories in foreign affairs.
Click to expand...

The only really "successful" instance of a "multicultural" nation is China and even that basically "Hanified" all the groups it conquered to some degree. The rest no longer exist or in the case of India are quiet young and have already experienced some splitting.
 
Carrot of Truth said:
The only really "successful" instance of a "multicultural" nation is China and even that basically "Hanified" all the groups it conquered to some degree. The rest no longer exist or in the case of India are quiet young and have already experienced some splitting.
Click to expand...
"successful" is a stretch.
they are a paper tiger.
horribly mismanaged
communist dystopia.
demographic collapse.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 1, guests: 4)
Back
Top