Five minutes of hate news

As @Morphic Tide had already said, diverse states were historically quite successful, but a) vast majority of diverse states were not multiracial, just multiethnic and b) they treated different ethnicities properly as groups instead of trying to put everything in a blender and calling resulting diarrhea a nation.

Example:

European Union was in fact supposed to be something akin to the above, but then it got taken over by the leftists and is now busy facilitating genocide.
 
As @Morphic Tide had already said, diverse states were historically quite successful, but a) vast majority of diverse states were not multiracial, just multiethnic and b) they treated different ethnicities properly as groups instead of trying to put everything in a blender and calling resulting diarrhea a nation.

Example:

European Union was in fact supposed to be something akin to the above, but then it got taken over by the leftists and is now busy facilitating genocide.

That thing doesn't exist anymore and even during its era was mostly German with a few non German components.
 

Yet another example of black on white crime that the media is doing its best to ignore.

Here’s the donation page if anyone wants to help the family out.
 
Roman Republic and even Roman Empire used basically the same principle. And all three were far more successful than the modern-day EU.
Above all Rome did it in the classic imperial variation where one particular group is above of all the others rather than trying to balance their interests with ideals of equality or something like that.
 
Above all Rome did it in the classic imperial variation where one particular group is above of all the others rather than trying to balance their interests with ideals of equality or something like that.
While true, that is not actually the answer. Because most empires did that, and most of them did not last anywhere as long as Rome.

Main reason why Roman Empire was so successful with its ethnic groups is that it coopted them instead of either forcibly assimilating or oppressing them. There was cultural assimilation, sure, but it was slow and largely voluntary process. Romans did not try to create a new "Roman" ethnicity, nor enforce some Marxist ideal of "we the people". If you followed the laws, paid the taxes and did not cause trouble, Romans left you alone to the point that there was little difference in life before and after the Roman conquest.
 
While true, that is not actually the answer. Because most empires did that, and most of them did not last anywhere as long as Rome.

Main reason why Roman Empire was so successful with its ethnic groups is that it coopted them instead of either forcibly assimilating or oppressing them. There was cultural assimilation, sure, but it was slow and largely voluntary process. Romans did not try to create a new "Roman" ethnicity, nor enforce some Marxist ideal of "we the people". If you followed the laws, paid the taxes and did not cause trouble, Romans left you alone to the point that there was little difference in life before and after the Roman conquest.
However if you wanted to get into any position of even close to Empire wide importance you had to practice the Roman culture though and no one pretended otherwise .

This system was also facilitated by a world where everything, people, material and information traveled slowly.
The voluntary nature was also helped by the exceptional cultural, military and economic strength of the empire, in this and also other, later cases.
 
Main reason why Roman Empire was so successful with its ethnic groups is that it coopted them instead of either forcibly assimilating or oppressing them. There was cultural assimilation, sure, but it was slow and largely voluntary process. Romans did not try to create a new "Roman" ethnicity, nor enforce some Marxist ideal of "we the people". If you followed the laws, paid the taxes and did not cause trouble, Romans left you alone to the point that there was little difference in life before and after the Roman conquest.
They prototypes the concept of civic nationalism with how they handled citizenship. The most important thing was not your ethnic background, but your legal citizenship. People sold themselves into slavery because it was a path to citizenship.
 


Karmelo Anthony and his family are now selling merch with his face on it…

The rage I’m currently experiencing is transcendental. It’s actually wrapped around back into this kind of weird calm.

….These people are going to get themselves killed. They’re going to keep doing stupid shit like this, the black community is going to continue circling the wagons, and someone is going to get hurt.

Then the country burns again for another D’indu Nuffin.

Edit:

Here’s the GoFundMe for Austin Metcalf’s family:

 
Last edited:
If I were the Metcalf family, I'd be pissed, I'd want vengeance, and I'd want to take everything the Anthony family has built off my child's death while watching their world burn.

That's just the evil me talking though...I hope.
More like sane you. That is a normal human response that has, somehow, for some reason, become demonized.
 


Is there any way we can get this idiot for violating the Logan Act?

Going to El Salvador to ask for the El Salvador criminal to be returned?
Eh, the issue is that the deportation may or may not have been legal and the like.
But once the guy was transferred it was over with.
The arguments I am seeing is nit proper due process
 
If I were the Metcalf family, I'd be pissed, I'd want vengeance, and I'd want to take everything the Anthony family has built off my child's death while watching their world burn.

That's just the evil me talking though...I hope.
No, that’s the entirely correct human instinct.

If someone killed a member of my family, I would likely be going to prison.
 
If I were the Metcalf family, I'd be pissed, I'd want vengeance, and I'd want to take everything the Anthony family has built off my child's death while watching their world burn.

That's just the evil me talking though...I hope.
No, that’s the entirely correct human instinct.

If someone killed a member of my family, I would likely be going to prison.
Meanwhile, the victim's father...
"Do not politicize this. It's not ... this is a human being thing. This person made a bad choice and affected both his family and my family forever.

"People ask me, how can you forgive this other person? I said I forgive the other person because the forgiveness is not for him. The forgiveness is for me so I can have peace," he said.
The other side:
At the conference, Minister Dominique Alexander, the founder of Next Generation Action, blasted Metcalf's attendance as a "disrespect to the dignity of his son."

"Regardless of what was going on, that was disrespectful," said the pastor before going on a tirade about oppression.
 
Meanwhile, the victim's father...

The other side:
This proves that you should never give these people grace or benefit of the doubt, because they’ll just attack you anyways.
 
Meanwhile, the victim's father...

The other side:
This is why his whole forgiveness speech was weak, pussy nonsense. He needs to grow and spine and speak up and speak out against this savage animal.

They need to throw the book at this murderous piece of shit, and I hope bad things happens to his family who is using this as a grift.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top