facepalm. You EXPLICITLY and SPECIFICALLY linked a reply, to a reply, to a quote of WSJ (with no link).
The reply you quoted stated:
> 1. Given up on mass deportation
> 2. Given up on ending brithright citizenship
> 3. Freeing black muslim pimps from jail
I went and searched for the WSJ article that is quoted but not linked
A Journal analysis found that military flights came at higher cost to taxpayers than the government’s typical deportation flights on civilian aircraft.
www.wsj.com
The article states that they are suspending the use of military planes but continuing mass deportation using civilian planes
This article is completely unrelated to issue 2 and issue 3.
As for issue 1, they are jumping to wild conclusions.
Switching to civilian airplanes isn't giving up, its changing the methods to aim to do so more efficiently. Assuming it is even real because it comes from WSJ