How does it affect the numbers?facepalm. You EXPLICITLY and SPECIFICALLY linked a reply, to a reply, to a quote of WSJ (with no link).
The reply you quoted stated:
> 1. Given up on mass deportation
> 2. Given up on ending brithright citizenship
> 3. Freeing black muslim pimps from jail
I went and searched for the WSJ article that is quoted but not linked
Exclusive | U.S. Suspends Costly Deportation Flights Using Military Aircraft
A Journal analysis found that military flights came at higher cost to taxpayers than the government’s typical deportation flights on civilian aircraft.www.wsj.com
The article states that they are suspending the use of military planes but continuing mass deportation using civilian planes
This article is completely unrelated to issue 2 and issue 3.
As for issue 1, they are jumping to wild conclusions.
Switching to civilian airplanes isn't giving up, its changing the methods to aim to do so more efficiently. Assuming it is even real because it comes from WSJ
> make up wild claims
>busted
1. tate isn't black. unless you are using the "1 drop rule".
Um akshually....
Obviously you don't know about his brother either.
More "i refuse to do my own research but i will criticize you for not spoonfeeding it to me".
You're wokeslop.
You also have zero proof that i have given up on building a hyperdrive in a cave, from a box of scraps.
I hope that is true. I'll look more into it tomorrow (if I remember).
Romance is two different things.
The history, laws, and theology around what we now call "shotgun weddings" together with well-documented neurochemistry make it clear that pair-bonding does in fact tend to begin with and revolve around sex. This being the case is why Western fertility decline is mostly from the loss of impulsive young girls getting knocked up and why early-life promiscuity causes women to be unfaithful. Together, the problem is almost nothing to do with sexual interest as initiator for relationship, but instead almost solely the rather separate matter of its loss as a cause to end.
Keep in mind the bantu isn't actually the native of the area. Basically South Africa is like if a bunch of Brazilians moved into Mexico, ate almost all the Mexicans who were being colonized by the Americans, then pushed all the Americans out to proclaim sovereignty.
Yea, the actual black natives of south africa were completely replaced. and many of them genocided and sometimes literally eaten by invaders from another nation. That came in AFTER the ending of apartheid.
Fukken what? I did not know this. Please, elaborate.
The black people you see in South Africa today come from a more north-west location. The 'actual' South Africans were relatively peaceful in comparison so they got eaten by the more aggressive invaders.
