Five minutes of hate news

Reader mode
mrttao said:
Romance. a twisted delusion far removed from reality that is causes untold harm to people as they waste their youth on unrealistic goals.
see. bulimia & oil muscle injections.
Click to expand...
  1. A love affair.
    His romance with her lasted only a month.
  2. Ardent emotional attachment or involvement between people; love.
    They kept the romance alive in their marriage for 35 years.
  3. A strong, sometimes short-lived attachment, fascination, or enthusiasm for something.
    a childhood romance with the sea.
  4. A mysterious or fascinating quality or appeal, as of something adventurous, heroic, or strangely beautiful.
  5. A long medieval narrative in prose or verse that tells of the adventures and heroic exploits of chivalric heroes.
    an Arthurian romance.
  6. A long fictitious tale of heroes and extraordinary or mysterious events, usually set in a distant time or place.
  7. The class of literature constituted by such tales.
  8. An artistic work, such as a novel, story, or film, that deals with sexual love, especially in an idealized form.
  9. The class or style of such works.
  10. A fictitiously embellished account or explanation.
    We have been given speculation and romance instead of the facts.
  11. (Music) A lyrical, tender, usually sentimental song or short instrumental piece.
  12. The Romance languages.

intransitive verb

  1. To think or behave in a romantic manner.
    a couple romancing in the moonlight.
  2. To court, woo, or try to arouse the romantic interest of.
  3. To have a love affair with.
  4. To try to persuade, as with flattery or incentives.
    a candidate who romanced the party's delegates for votes.

adjective

  1. Of, relating to, or being any of the languages that developed from Latin, including Italian, French, Portuguese, Romanian, and Spanish.
Click to expand...

Wow, so weird that none of that is in its definition.
 
> Congo Island is critical USA military base in middle of Indian Ocean
> Mauritius is a teeny tiny island some distance away, that never owned Congo Island.
> Congo Island is owned by UK, serving as USA military base.
> Mauritus sued UK in UN and UN court "advised" they should "give back" Congo to the nation who never owned it. Because "muh colonialism"
> Meanwhile the president of Mauritius that started the whole thing was voted out of office and arrested for money laundering. 24 million dollars in cash was found in his home.
> Starmehr wants to actually give Congo Island and the USA military base to Mauritius and is trying to convince trump to let him do it.
> Sen Kennedy lays out the entire situation and how absurd it is.
> says Starmehr should get an emotional support pony instead.
> advises trump not let this handover happen.

 
RenegadeInterrupt said:
hotair.com

Democrats Encouraged Zelenskyy to Confront Trump

hotair.com hotair.com
Click to expand...
IMG_1028.png
 
I mean, you have people right here claiming Zelensky threatened Trump and Vance, even though anyone can see the same video and see that he was simply pointing out that the ocean won't always protect us.
 
My above post is only partially true
He didn't meet with that particular dem
 
Just found this
freebeacon.com

DNC Frontrunner Wanted Trump Charged With ‘Treason’—Which Carries the Death Penalty

One of the frontrunners to lead the Democratic National Committee once called for Donald Trump to be put on trial for treason and accused the Republican of causing the deaths of American soldiers, all based on an unfounded allegation that even the Biden administration disputed.
freebeacon.com freebeacon.com
I guess the question now is: if Democrats and liberals want to kill Trump and people like me who support Trump, why are we always expected to take the high road when these people are literally calling for the death of their political opponents?
 
RenegadeInterrupt said:
Just found this
freebeacon.com

DNC Frontrunner Wanted Trump Charged With ‘Treason’—Which Carries the Death Penalty

One of the frontrunners to lead the Democratic National Committee once called for Donald Trump to be put on trial for treason and accused the Republican of causing the deaths of American soldiers, all based on an unfounded allegation that even the Biden administration disputed.
freebeacon.com freebeacon.com
I guess the question now is: if Democrats and liberals want to kill Trump and people like me who support Trump, why are we always expected to take the high road when these people are literally calling for the death of their political opponents?
Click to expand...
A big part of the MAGA movement has been driven by basically the mentality of "fuck the high road," because all that's been doing is getting us screwed.

Trump and the MAGA branch of Republicans are finally fighting back, and we must continue to support politicians who will, and primary those who won't.

And put a foot down in your personal life as well.
 
Marduk said:
>-WSJ
Learn to fucking read. Is it much to ask?
Click to expand...
facepalm. You EXPLICITLY and SPECIFICALLY linked a reply, to a reply, to a quote of WSJ (with no link).

The reply you quoted stated:
<2 months in and they’ve already quietly given up on mass deportations and ending birthright citizenship. Now they’re just tossing out red meat to the For You Page Right by freeing black Muslim pimps from jail and trolling le Ukronazis epic style in hopes that their base forgets
Click to expand...
> 1. Given up on mass deportation
> 2. Given up on ending brithright citizenship
> 3. Freeing black muslim pimps from jail

I went and searched for the WSJ article that is quoted but not linked
www.wsj.com

Exclusive | U.S. Suspends Costly Deportation Flights Using Military Aircraft

A Journal analysis found that military flights came at higher cost to taxpayers than the government’s typical deportation flights on civilian aircraft.
www.wsj.com www.wsj.com

The article states that they are suspending the use of military planes but continuing mass deportation using civilian planes

This article is completely unrelated to issue 2 and issue 3.
As for issue 1, they are jumping to wild conclusions.
Switching to civilian airplanes isn't giving up, its changing the methods to aim to do so more efficiently. Assuming it is even real because it comes from WSJ
 
Last edited:
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 2, guests: 3)
Back
Top