DarthOne
☦️
Make warriors great again. I think the issue is we decided to placate weakness in the name of false kindness rather than teaching people how to be strong.
Definitely.
Make warriors great again. I think the issue is we decided to placate weakness in the name of false kindness rather than teaching people how to be strong.
Definitely.
What's this in reference to?*Sigh* that 10% buddy. That 10% is what separates you and me.
Darth and I agree about 90% on things but that other 10% is some VERY stark differences.What's this in reference to?
*Sigh* that 10% buddy. That 10% is what separates you and me.
There's nothing wrong with having disagreements and differences. Provided people keep everything nice and civil. ;DDarth and I agree about 90% on things but that other 10% is some VERY stark differences.
Which parts?Darth and I agree about 90% on things but that other 10% is some VERY stark differences.
The fact that he's Orthodox for starters (I'm protestant) the idea that giving women the vote was a mistake (I don't agree with that, though I do think letting individuals vote as opposed to one vote per household like it used to be was a mistake)Which parts?
To be fair, it basically allowed politicians to win despite not actually catering to the people who make the world go around. Men.The fact that he's Orthodox for starters (I'm protestant) the idea that giving women the vote was a mistake (I don't agree with that, though I do think letting individuals vote as opposed to one vote per household like it used to be was a mistake)
And let's just say I'm seeing patterns of behavior from him that I've seen in other posters whom truly did go off the deep end. One being a rather infamous example on the sietch. I'm just worried.
Women place abortion over topics like econonomics, democracy, freedom.
How many of those women are metropolitan (and often inner city) upper crust babies raised on government programs, Disney princess movies and sholocy romance books? Call it a hunch but I don't think it was the tomboys that voted for abortion.To be fair, it basically allowed politicians to win despite not actually catering to the people who make the world go around. Men.
Women place abortion over topics like econonomics, democracy, freedom.
That's a problem, a BIG one. A world where women votes is a world where the economy is in shambles, democracy is fading, and freedoms are denied. But at least mothers can murder their own babies without issue! But hey that's just fiction, fantasy, right?
*Looks outside*
...Wait a minute...
The very instant women got the vote, the whole feminism thing started going full-force. There's been centuries of bottled up anti-male hatred within women, and it's not leaving anytime soon.How many of those women are metropolitan (and often inner city) upper crust babies raised on government programs, Disney princess movies and sholocy romance books? Call it a hunch but I don't think it was the tomboys that voted for abortion.
How many of those women are metropolitan (and often inner city) upper crust babies raised on government programs, Disney princess movies and sholocy romance books? Call it a hunch but I don't think it was the tomboys that voted for abortion.
... you know literally nothing about the feminist movement.The very instant women got the vote, the whole feminism thing started going full-force. There's been centuries of bottled up anti-male hatred within women, and it's not leaving anytime soon.
MGTOW told him otherwise... you know literally nothing about the feminist movement.
At least we agree on something.There is a reason why I say an attack on the tomboy is an attack on one of the major cornerstones of Western culture. Strong women (both in body and mind) produce strong children
Giving people a vote instead of making them earn it was a mistake. Each household should have one vote per child produced or adopted, and individuals should earn votes through service.The fact that he's Orthodox for starters (I'm protestant) the idea that giving women the vote was a mistake (I don't agree with that, though I do think letting individuals vote as opposed to one vote per household like it used to be was a mistake)
This is probably the worst solution I've heard so far.Giving people a vote instead of making them earn it was a mistake. Each household should have one vote per child produced or adopted, and individuals should earn votes through service.
If you're an essential worker to keeping our society running you get a vote, if you put your life on the line for our country you get extra votes depending on the amount of time invested.
All men may have been created equal but the amount we contribute sure as shit isn't. A veteran should have more votes allocated to them, so should a firefighter or a cop, or a doctor for that matter.
We have more than enough data to rank jobs by danger, and to pick out the ones that are essential for the country to function.
The voters decide, and if they're essential then reality decides. If a class of workers that's essential is getting disenfranchised then they can boycott and threaten to collapse the society until their demands are met.This is probably the worst solution I've heard so far.
Who decides what jobs are more important? Let's say someone you don't like gets in power and decides that all teachers and professors are essential to building our next generation. 3 votes each. Blue collar laborers? Replaceable. Not as important. One vote.
Each household you doofus, two parents would be required and divorce would disqualify you.You get an extra vote for every kid? Cool, femocrst voting welfare queens get like 5-9 votes so they can go vote for more handouts.
Yep the party that represents essential workers, veterans, police officers, firefighters, and families would win.And let that kind of thing play out at large.
Whatever party gets power would use that power to make sure they never lose another election.
Okay so the voters decide.The voters decide, and if they're essential then reality decides. If a class of workers that's essential is getting disenfranchised then they can boycott and threaten to collapse the society until their demands are met.
Each household you doofus, two parents would be required and divorce would disqualify you.
Yep the party that represents essential workers, veterans, police officers, firefighters, and families would win.
That would only be a problem if they had votes to begin with, the education people may decide that they're more important but that doesn't mean shit if they can't vote.Okay so the voters decide.
About 15,000,000 people work in the education system.
They are liberal by a mass majority
There's about 900,000 police and 1,200,000 firefighters.
So the education people decide they're more important and the police and firefighters.
Bam. Now teachers get more votes.
So this is a massively complex and nearly impossible to manage system that you've cooked up.
We'd be better off if we just repealed the 19th ammendment lol