Muhammad was an extremely charismatic and effective war lord who was able to unify a bunch of backwater desert tribes through a fanatical cult ideology to take over much of what would have been their known world and turn his cult into a major unifying social power around the world.
Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
Muhammad was an extremely charismatic and effective war lord who was able to unify a bunch of backwater desert tribes through a fanatical cult ideology to take over much of what would have been their known world and turn his cult into a major unifying social power around the world.
King Arts
Well-known member
Ahh just the classic case of how selfish the English are they only dislike something when it negatively affects them. It's bad because foreigners are replacing YOU and your interests are being ignored.
No fuck you English assholes you have fucked with so many people throughout history this is just the chickens coming home to roost since you have made enemies of many nations from dividing Europe to enslaving Africans and Asians you deserve the trannies and groomers and to be replaced.
What hurts the enemy is good, I'd say that the UK is the only nation that I'd cheer if it became communists.
As a Christian I feel very weird having to defend Islam here. But Doom these are absolute shit arguments you are giving here, honestly a better argument against Islam is the satanic verses controversy and Muhamud's "miracle" of splitting the moon which people all over the world should have seen and recorded yet no one except Muslim societies wrote about years after it happened.
Those are good arguments against Islam, what you brought forward is just giving legitimacy and putting yourself under liberal secular humanism.
"Mohamud let his followers sack cities that they conquered and enslaved people and raped women that's wrong by 21st century morality!"
I mean how are you going to dance around the issue when atheists say the Bible is no different and that it gives instructions to go kill all the men women and boys in a city but take the little girls who did not know a man yet as sex slaves? You gonna dance yourself in pretzles or are you going to denounce Moses and God and call them war criminals?
This is just pure stupid, Muslims are closer to heretics and schismatics but they aren't demon worshippers anymore than Jews are. Immortal you always say the weirdest shit.
LordDemiurge
Well-known member
Not really.
Globohomo seeks the entropy and homogenization of all culture and values and has no end goal beyond digesting everything that can be digested.
I've grown up muslim and then left the religion. Albeit my experience is mostly with muslims in America, Turkey and Morocco.
Generally speaking, the average Muslim is pretty much taught values that are almost word for word identical to what the average devout Christian gets taught. I don't mean urban 'modern' muslims either, I mean as in even in my grandparent's farming village. Albeit of course everyone always glosses over the unpleasant bits of the Quran and Hadiths.
The Quran is definitely more militant than the Bible due to the emphasis placed on the Prophet Muhammad's military exploits. For example this is still canon in Islam. Also being an apostate I'm condemned to the lower parts of hell and warrant execution if scripture holds true, so I'm not exactly fond of carrying water for them.
Last edited:
Wow. You really a deluded cunt.
You're advocating that a country be essentially transformed and replaced at a cultural level over what was done in the past, and what was done by pretty much every other civilization in history, including those "Asians" and "Africans" you're pitying so much.
The British Empire at its height was just better at it than everyone else.
Those slaves you were talking about? The Empire was pretty much the first to outlaw it, and we only repaid the amount spent in doing so... I think it was in the last twenty years or so? Any slave that stepped aboard a Royal Navy ship or British soil was automatically freed.
Also, who the fuck do you think sold African slaves to "Whitey" (not just us but the Americans/Colonists, too) in the first place? Other fucking Africans.
And this isn't even mentioning the slavery committed by Muslims (Barbary Slave Trade) who used to raid the British coast looking for white teenagers/young women up until the 16th century (to the point where entire Cornish, English coastal, and Welsh villages vanished overnight), and the Ottomans enslaving Eastern Europeans and Austrians/Germans.
...Actually, scratch that, you're not just a deluded cunt but an ignorant one, too.
So, yeah, a mod can give me a warning for this, but I have to say it: you're as much as an ignorant cunt as a Leftist. You're just as bad as them.
King Arts
Well-known member
Umm very few people are complete moral nihilists who do whatever they want with only their own personal benefit being the sole goal. As a Christian they are wrong because their understanding of God is flawed. The source of morality is God, so obeying our heavenly father is the way to righteousness. If you fail to obey him because of a mistake(in the case of Muslims who were tricked by a false prophet), or worse because you actively oppose him(as in the case of Atheists and satanists) is morally wrong.
Oh yes I understand tribalism I'm just saying that if there is a great other threat than different tribes won't fight each other when there is a big danger that is attacking everyone. The example is the Soviets and the Allies they got along well until the group that was a greater other(Nazis) were gone then they turned on each other.
I'm glad you left Islam brother. I do hope you stay safe and are able to practice Christianity safely.
You seem to be the deluded retard.
And yes I am advocating a country that has spent hundreds of years splitting Europe apart to prevent a single great empire from rising on the continent like Rome in the past to be essentially changed and replaced. Also don't try to deflect by saying it was done long ago it was done repeatedly from Spain, to France, to Germany. It has nothing to do with morality you always support the weaker party to divide Europe just to maintain British security.
Also no the British Empire was not the best empire in history like you deluded Brits think it was shit and it's colonies that did not have it's natives genocided(so you can't point to Anglophone countries) either hated it like India and resent your dominance like China, or are corrupt hellholes filled with barbarians like Africa. Compare that to Europe where ALL the former provinces of the Empire agreed it was awsome and were sad that it fell. No Rome brought civilization where it went including Britain, while Britain did not do very much to the places it went. The ONE thing I will give the Brits is ending Sati in India.
Also you deluded sjw where did I start talking about slavery? The triangle trade was bad because of a few reasons. From racism, to it being extremely brutal, and hypocritical. But the British moral crusade against slavery is also eye roll worthy, ending it all over and saying "Muh hostis humani generis!" is also crazy you stupid fuckers.
No I hate the British people because they are leftists, your nation is the only nation that deserves everything that is happening to it.
Also I hope the mods do not infract you because everyone should be able to state their dumb oppinions even filthy Englishmen.
EDIT: Also I know about the Barbary and the Ottomans they sucked and were assholes it's great that they fell but the UK was not really instrumental in their defeat. Hell the US in it's early history did more to fight the Barbary pirates than England.
LordDemiurge
Well-known member
Not Christian either, though I've briefly researched and considered it.
I'm not not much of an atheist anymore either, so the best answer I can give is that I'm between religions at the moment.
Though I appreciate the sentiment, thank you.
Last edited:
mrttao
Well-known member
Companies taking a hit from inflation just makes it easier for the umberalla corporations to buy them out.
There are "rich" who are like "I own 10 burger places. I built them myself over 40 years"
And then there are rich like "I own a bank. This requires permission from govt. This makes me one of the few who are legally allowed to print money. letting me literally print infinite money to steal from everyone to give myself"
They are both rich. but different kind of rich
Last edited:
...You literally mentioned the UK enslaving Africans and Asians.
You are truly an ignorant, disgusting person with a personal hate-boner against the UK. I'm not going to waste another moment dealing with you.
Right, the disparity between someone worth 10,00,000 and 100,000,000 is the same as the disparity between someone earning 7 figures and someone earning poverty line income.
mrttao
Well-known member
are you being serious or sarcastic?
Also, I was referring more to the methods of acquiring wealth rather than the quantity. Although, the method actually are the reason for the disparity in the quantity.
mrttao
Well-known member
Wikipedia calls him a Nazi and a far-right extremist.
Which is the greatest endorsement I have heard
Blasterbot
Well-known member
uh no that isn't the level of wealth disparity described. the difference between the top 10 and a guy with 10 mil in assets is huge though. and someone who lives in the US and is making 10k a year vs the 10 mil guy? while different they are closer that the other guy.
DarthOne
☦️
Considering Wikipedia left wing bias I can see where you’d get that from. Just be careful; I’ve seen a lot of people who are slippery slopping towards actual nazism.
King Arts
Well-known member
Ahh I'm sorry I was unclear I was being poetic it's like when people say a nation is raping nature, or another nation it does not have to literally refer to consensual sex. I was actually speaking of colonialism and equating what the British did in Africa and India to slavery.
I did not mean to talk about the slave trade, I'm sorry for being unclear.
I'm disgusting and ignorant because I dislike the English? Well disgusting is a moral judgment which is baseless from Brits who backstab everyone. But how am I ignorant of history? Does your nation not actively work to weaken strong European nations for the benefit of the weaker ones, then if the weaker gains the upper hand you switch sides? Is this not the issue with France and Germany?
Yinko
Well-known member
He considered everything after writing came to Europe to have been a mistake. Not because of writing itself, but because he hated the rationalist worldview that the Greeks brought. He called himself an arch-traditionalist, but it might have been better to have called him an aristocratic reactionary as seen through the lens of romanticism. He also had a habit of trolling people, using hot-button terms to get a rise out of people he had no respect for, so be aware of that.
Blasterbot
Well-known member
sounds like a fun read honestly. shitting on the greeks is pretty fun. they had some good ideas but they also had their heads up their asses.
A guy making ten mil a year is still one or two bad years away from insolvency.
Someone worth a hundred million doesn't have to worry about that unless he fucks up catastrophically.
Last edited:
We're being invaded.
