Excellence in Shitlording

[Zyobot]

The Groomers United Community doesn't represent people who are gay, Bi, or lesbian. It just represents the mentally ill, the exhibitionists, the predators/kiddie-fuckers, and worse.

These companies don't understand this. It's starting to become their undoing.

Not to mention homophobia ticking up in the public at large, in large part due to Leftists and their corporate-media allies conflating the Pride crap with acceptance of "normal" LGB's who are just like you or me. And it's precisely because of this that the distinction will fade from the public's minds, and start reviving old bigotry where it was declining before.

As I've said before: I think in a hundred years' time, genocide scholarship will look much different than it does now. While it'd make the perpretrators no less evil and is no excuse for the innocents they callously mass-murder, it'll also be far more evident that their hatred didn't just come out of thin air. Even worse is that much of it could've been avoided, if all parties had agreed to moderate reforms and to work on things they legitimately needed to work on before it was too late.

 

[Jormungandr]

Not to mention homophobia ticking up in the public at large, in large part due to Leftists and their corporate-media allies conflating the Pride crap with acceptance of "normal" LGB's who are just like you or me. And it's precisely because of this that the distinction will fade from the public's minds, and start reviving old bigotry where it was declining before.

As I've said before: I think in a hundred years' time, genocide scholarship will look much different than it does now. While it'd make the perpretrators no less evil and is no excuse for the innocents they callously mass-murder, it'll also be far more evident that their hatred didn't just come out of thin air. Even worse is that much of it could've been avoided, if all parties had agreed to moderate reforms and to work on things they legitimately needed to work on before it was too late.

Ah, I'm 100% hetero, but I've been skulking around soc-med to know that normal people who are gay/Bi/lesbian utterly hate this shit (and are worried about the blow back on them because of the groomers), and know that these corpos are just trying to exploit them.

We're basically see all this unfold in real-time. I wonder if this is how people felt in the late 19th/early 20th, seeing things unfold?

 

[Zyobot]

Ah, I'm 100% hetero, but I've been skulking around soc-med to know that normal people who are gay/Bi/lesbian utterly hate this shit (and are worried about the blow back on them because of the groomers), and know that these corpos are just trying to exploit them.

We're basically see all this unfold in real-time. I wonder if this is how people felt in the late 19th/early 20th, seeing things unfold?

Contemplate that myself, too, yeah.

As a matter of fact... I think we're starting to learn how people back then felt as things were heading to pot in general. The modern West as a more slow-boiling "Worldwide Weimar" is the example everyone here cites, so that hardly bears repeating here.

However, I'd say there are "latter-day" instances of history rhyming closely enough with current events for us to empathize better with those who first lived it, such as New York City devolving into New Detroit (since people who witnessed OG Detroit deteriorate probably witnessed much the same sky-high crime rates and middle-class flight we are). Or, the 1960s and 2010s both having a "clean-ish" delineation between the more "reserved" politics and pop culture of the first half (JFK in the early Sixties, first-term Obama in the early Tens), and the wild escalation of the second (LBJ and Nixon in the later Sixties, second-term Obama and Trump in the later Tens). Not quite close enough to downright "copy-paste" past events onto the modern backdrop, of course, but still similar enough for us to at least empathize.

 

[Jormungandr]

Contemplate that myself, too, yeah.

As a matter of fact... I think we're starting to learn how people back then felt as things were heading to pot in general. The modern West as a more slow-boiling "Worldwide Weimar" is the example everyone here cites, so that hardly bears repeating here.

However, I'd say there are "latter-day" instances of history rhyming closely enough with current events for us to empathize better with those who first lived it, such as New York City devolving into New Detroit (since people who witnessed OG Detroit deteriorate probably witnessed much the same sky-high crime rates and middle-class flight we are). Or, the 1960s and 2010s both having a "clean-ish" delineation between the more "reserved" politics and pop culture of the first half (JFK in the early Sixties, first-term Obama in the early Tens), and the wild escalation of the second (LBJ and Nixon in the later Sixties, second-term Obama and Trump in the later Tens). Not quite close enough to downright "copy-paste" past events onto the modern backdrop, of course, but still similar enough for us to at least empathize.

It's definitely cyclical, yeah.

Apparently Canada is the same? Rent and such in places like Toronto (or was it Montreal?) are skyrocketing, and the city's infrastructure was meant for like 3/4 million people, not 9+. Crime is also spiking, as is a slow breakdown in municipalities.

 

[Zyobot]

It's definitely cyclical, yeah.

Apparently Canada is the same? Rent and such in places like Toronto (or was it Montreal?) are skyrocketing, and the city's infrastructure was meant for like 3/4 million people, not 9+. Crime is also spiking, as is a slow breakdown in municipalities.

Don’t know, though if true, color me unsurprised it that breeds crime, as well as mass-flight by residents and businesses who can afford it. Those who can’t move will have to watch their homes and surroundings devolve into total cesspools, I fear.

Also, I should probably clarify that I’m actually straight myself, too. Never really understood what was so upsetting about LGB’s being free to have their own private relationships without shoving it in everyone’s faces, though, as I recall going pretty much “WTF?” when I first learned why it upset so many people. Now that it is being shoved in everyone’s faces, however… well, I think we know what kind backlash that’ll trigger, once everything goes to Hell.

 

[Cherico]

Don’t know, though if true, color me unsurprised it that breeds crime, as well as mass-flight by residents and businesses who can afford it. Those who can’t move will have to watch their homes and surroundings devolve into total cesspools, I fear.

Also, I should probably clarify that I’m actually straight myself, too. Never really understood what was so upsetting about LGB’s being free to have their own private relationships without shoving it in everyone’s faces, though, as I recall going pretty much “WTF?” when I first learned why it upset so many people. Now that it is being shoved in everyone’s faces, however… well, I think we know what kind backlash that’ll trigger, once everything goes to Hell.

My money is that the LGB side of the rainbow throws everyone else under the bus when things go to shit.

 

[mrttao]

My money is that the LGB side of the rainbow throws everyone else under the bus when things go to shit.

They aren't allowed to. They get deplatformed for hate speech when they try to.
besides which, they have their own sets of problems. Gay grooming was a thing even before it resulted in the child being castrated.

 

[Cherico]

They aren't allowed to. They get deplatformed for hate speech when they try to.
besides which, they have their own sets of problems. Gay grooming was a thing even before it resulted in the child being castrated.

Its doesn't matter what people are 'allowed' to do or not do but what will actually happen.

When things go to shit, people do what they have to do to survive.

 

[LordsFire]

Its doesn't matter what people are 'allowed' to do or not do but what will actually happen.

When things go to shit, people do what they have to do to survive.

It isn't likely to help them remain in good social standing.

The left will reject them for refusing to 100% toe the line.

The right will continue to hold the stance that homosexuality is fundamentally immoral.

'Moderates' will mostly end up getting dragged into one of the other two stances, as they almost always do.

 

[Jormungandr]

It isn't likely to help them remain in good social standing.

The left will reject them for refusing to 100% toe the line.

The right will continue to hold the stance that homosexuality is fundamentally immoral.

'Moderates' will mostly end up getting dragged into one of the other two stances, as they almost always do.

The religious elements of the Right, yeah -- but more and more atheists/non-religious conservatives are looking at all the escalating grooming shit going on and conflating it with every gay, Bi, and lesbian out there, instead of it all just being pushed by the, well, degenerates. "Tarred with the same brush", and all.

 

[Bacle]

The religious elements of the Right, yeah -- but more and more atheists/non-religious conservatives are looking at all the escalating grooming shit going on and conflating it with every gay, Bi, and lesbian out there, instead of it all just being pushed by the, well, degenerates. "Tarred with the same brush", and all.

Which is precisely what the Left want with their accelerating 'pride and grooming' shit and parasiting the T's onto the LGBs; to make it so that there is no middle position, and for the reactionary Right to conflate any non-hetero with abusers and predators and try to push that view onto the middle.

The kneejerk reactionary 'all LGBs are bad because of groomers, abusers, pedos, and such' or the kneejerk evangelical 'sinner angle' that mostly relies on Biblical fanfiction to justify itself (that's all Leviticus is, fanfiction) is precisely the reaction the Far-Left want to provoke, because it will help keep non-hetero people and their 'allies' afraid of anyone with R's by their name in politics.

The best way to keep this from happening and defuse the Far-Left's plan is to actually put in the fucking effort to not alienate LGB's who do not make their sexual orientation their social and political identity, or smear all of them as targets for 'Right Wing Backlash' as so many here are very willing to do.

Because talk like that is precisely why people in the middle still are wary of the GOP and see it as a bunch of Bible-Thumping nutters who want to push Christianity onto a multi-faith nation, and that any notion otherwise is just a political deception tactic.

 

[Zyobot]

Anyway, from the Big Daddy of Shitlords himself:

 

[Cherico]

Anyway, from the Big Daddy of Shitlords himself:

he's not wrong.

 

[Zyobot]

he's not wrong.

Too true, LOL.

 

[mrttao]

Its doesn't matter what people are 'allowed' to do or not do but what will actually happen.

When things go to shit, people do what they have to do to survive.

I literally talked to some gays who tried to take an anti grooming stance and also wanted to to LGB without the T and were deplatformed completely everywhere.
And that was years ago.
So how can it happen?

 

[Cherico]

I literally talked to some gays who tried to take an anti grooming stance and also wanted to to LGB without the T and were deplatformed completely everywhere.
And that was years ago.
So how can it happen?

The circumstances of today wont last forever, they never do and all you need to do to get the ball rolling on major cultural change is a hard core of 20% once the tipping point is reached things start changing.

 

[DarthOne]

The circumstances of today wont last forever, they never do and all you need to do to get the ball rolling on major cultural change is a hard core of 20% once the tipping point is reached things start changing.

Good luck with blackrock and soros funding left wing propaganda every where.

 

[Cherico]

Good luck with blackrock and soros funding left wing propaganda every where.

Soros is fucking old and won't live forever, and black rock makes a lot of very bad financial decisions. That money is not going to last forever. And once Soros kicks the bucket you will see a giant splash of money and then see the cash dry up as the money is embezzlemed and misused in mass.

So your talking about something that will be a factor for a couple decades. I'm looking at things from a generational standpoint.

 

[DarthOne]

Soros is fucking old and won't live forever, and black rock makes a lot of very bad financial decisions. That money is not going to last forever. And once Soros kicks the bucket you will see a giant splash of money and then see the cash dry up as the money is embezzlemed and misused in mass.

So your talking about something that will be a factor for a couple decades. I'm looking at things from a generational standpoint.

Soros’s son officially just took over and is more the likely to double down on things.

 

[Zyobot]

Soros’s son officially just took over and is more the likely to double down on things.

Honestly, I think we should generally take a step back before celebrating when the current crop of swamp creatures are all gone.

Why, you might ask?

Simple: Because they'll recruit younger replacements who are just as bad as they are. Quite possibly, even worse, no thanks to how The Establishment will get more shrill, hysterical, and panicked as the wealth runs out and The Populists gain more momentum — and thus, squeeze the populace more tightly and brutalize them more ferociously than the previous oligarchs had as they fight tooth and nail to keep power. Might not all collapse tomorrow, but as the phrase goes, "Things collapse slowly, at first... then, all at once."