Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

What's the sitch?

Well-known member
Assuming anything was found and not deleted or damaged enough to give "reasonable doubt" after all this time, scotus will cuck regardless claiming that the election already happened, that there is no standing and whatever was found doesn't matter anyway. "In order to maintain peace", not unlike how Chauvin was sacrificed.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
Lets hope that the results are delivered clearly, accurately, and faithfully, with any issues brought forward and any issues with missing info (such as on the Dominion routers they won't surrender) are highlighted.

We'll have to see what SCOTUS does tomorrow as well; there record on this sort of thing is not favorable to the GOP or anything that could upset the apple cart of the election.

If things in Croatia are any indication, they will support whatever electoral fraud produces the correct (read: Leftist) result. And I think things in the US may be even worse than in Croatia...
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
Assuming anything was found and not deleted or damaged enough to give "reasonable doubt" after all this time, scotus will cuck regardless claiming that the election already happened, that there is no standing and whatever was found doesn't matter anyway. "In order to maintain peace", not unlike how Chauvin was sacrificed.
Huh, and here I thought Chauvin was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Who exactly do you think "sacrificed" him, and how?
 

What's the sitch?

Well-known member
Notice the phrasing "not unlike" not "exactly the same". The supreme court is a group of people that are identifiable coming to a decision as is a jury(in this day in age of technology). They have lives outside their "sacred" duty and despite the romance of the idea of the justice system people always have their other reasons that tempt them and are no longer able to make unbiased decisions.

They were also prepared to arrest chauvin anyway and charge him with other things if he had been acquitted. It really sounds like the shadow council of unnaccountable oligarchs had already come to a decision in order to try and appease certain groups.
 
Last edited:

Megadeath

Well-known member
Who selects the jury? I doubt they just round up randos from the street...
Uh... Effectively that's exactly what they do, actually. Then the lawyers for both sides get a chance to question and dismiss them, in a slightly complicated process designed to ensure as little prejudice and bias as possible. It's worrying you don't know this.

Notice the phrasing "not unlike" not "exactly the same". The supreme court is a group of people that are identifiable coming to a decision, as is a jury(in this day in age of technology). They have lives outside their "sacred" duty and despite the romance of the justice system people always have their other reasons that tempt them to make decisions.

They were also prepared to arrest chauvin anyway and charge him with other things if he had been acquitted. It really sounds like the shadow council of unnaccountable oligarchs had already come to a decision in order to try and appease certain groups.
Eh? If he'd been acquitted they'd have arrested him anyway? But, he'd already been arrested. The order is warrant, arrest, charge, trial. Were there other warrants waiting in the wings to allow them to arrest him again? I've never even heard crazy theories like that, and it's just not how things work. If there were other charges, they'd all be bought at the same time. You know, the whole "You are charged with 1 count of assault, 2 counts of breaking and entering, and 487 counts of resisting arrest." bit?

Now, I'm no expert so I'm probably slightly fudging that but your last paragraph sounds paranoid and out of touch with reality.
 

Free-Stater 101

Freedom Means Freedom!!!
Nuke Mod
Moderator
Staff Member
Uh... Effectively that's exactly what they do, actually. Then the lawyers for both sides get a chance to question and dismiss them, in a slightly complicated process designed to ensure as little prejudice and bias as possible. It's worrying you don't know this.
Now to be a little fair on him. Aldarion is from Croatia and some countries don't have common law juries, they might only conduct bench trials you know...
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
Now to be a little fair on him. Aldarion is from Croatia and some countries don't have common law juries, they might only conduct bench trials you know...
You're right, my bad. Best as I can tell it doesn't look like they do have juries. Kinda figured everyone on earth was so exposed to American shows/movies and other pop culture it would be common knowledge, but that's a rather silly assumption.
 

Bigking321

Well-known member
He could probably do alright but he would have both sides of the establishment and 100% of media trying to crush and silence the new party.

Instead of... you know... both sides of the establishment, half of it secretly, and 90% of media trying to crush and silence him personally.

Still cleaning out a current party is probably the better option.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
Uh... Effectively that's exactly what they do, actually. Then the lawyers for both sides get a chance to question and dismiss them, in a slightly complicated process designed to ensure as little prejudice and bias as possible. It's worrying you don't know this.

We use Roman system in Croatia, not an Anglo-Saxon one.
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
We use Roman system in Croatia, not an Anglo-Saxon one.
Yeah, fair enough and my apologies for casting aspersions. I'm guessing you're not a law and order fan either. But yes, the jury is randomly picked from the general population and then pruned of obvious bias by the lawyers for both sides.
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
Yeah, fair enough and my apologies for casting aspersions. I'm guessing you're not a law and order fan either. But yes, the jury is randomly picked from the general population and then pruned of obvious bias by the lawyers for both sides.

OK, thanks.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
We'll have to see what SCOTUS does tomorrow as well; there record on this sort of thing is not favorable to the GOP or anything that could upset the apple cart of the election.
SCOTUS has to know that regardless of what they do about 1/2 of the US is gonna hate their guts...
SCOTUS is going to cuck.
So yeah, about that...


6-3 upholding Arizona's new laws, with Alito writing the opinion.

So yeah, did not cuck.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top