Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Yes.
I know this
You're from GA ? How long do you think GA Dems will be shut out of statewide offices including the GA Governor's Mansion ?

I know GA Dems currently hold some statewide offices including both US Senate seats, one seat on GA Supreme Court, etc.,
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
You're from GA ? How long do you think GA Dems will be shut out of statewide offices including the GA Governor's Mansion ?

I know GA Dems currently hold some statewide offices including both US Senate seats, one seat on GA Supreme Court, etc.,
Well, after last year, the state is not happy, and we have some people running that if win would change the state for the better.
As long as Abrams doesn't get elected Governor we are good
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
This uppity jackass does realize that the audit revealed Biden still won AZ's electoral votes & the election.

AZ Dems likely to be energized to come out in 2022 & if I recall, AZ is trending Blue.
No it didn't; they could not actually determine the true winner, because they were denied the access needed to complete a full audit like they had wanted to.

There are more than enough dodgy ballots to overrun Biden's margin of victory, and there seem to have been criminal actions taken during and after the election by election officials.

And this was just in one county; we need to see an audit of every county/burrough/parish in the nation before we can know the true winner and true numbers.

The media are lying and misrepresenting the report and presentation to trying to shape the narrative before normies)plebs can watch the presentation/look at the report themselves.

Biden is in the White House, and I do not think Trump will be 'reinstated'.

That however does not mean I think Biden 'won' legitly.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
No it didn't; they could not actually determine the true winner, because they were denied the access needed to complete a full audit like they had wanted to.

There are more than enough dodgy ballots to overrun Biden's margin of victory, and there seem to have been criminal actions taken during and after the election by election officials.

And this was just in one county; we need to see an audit of every county/burrough/parish in the nation before we can know the true winner and true numbers.

The media are lying and misrepresenting the report and presentation to trying to shape the narrative before normies)plebs can watch the presentation/look at the report themselves.

Biden is in the White House, and I do not think Trump will be 'reinstated'.

That however does not mean I think Biden 'won' legitly.
Agreed. Biden/Harris will see this term hrough.

What just happened exposed the fraud, and gives us that much more of a chance to combat it next time. Some people will be facing prison time over this too. And with that threat looming over them, they might squeal on their highers ups.

This ain't over by a long shot.

We have much more hope for 22/24, and that's because we fucking busted their asses, and now we know what to look for.

Next couple elections are going to be watched VERY CLOSELY. BUT we won't be ousting the Biden admin over this
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
It's a small victory but it is important. From this, bigger victories can be built.

The MAGA Movement (American Loyalists, essentially) now have their smoking gun, IE sufficient galvanisation for taking over the GOP and undermining future buggering with elections. Let's see what they do with it.
The Republican establishment will try to stall them out with disingenuous arguments over the validity of said smoking gun.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
He has actually conceded de facto by leaving the White House and letting Biden come in, but not de jure.

I mean this without any malice against Trump. It was the right course of action due to how bad things were. Despite what so many people think he is not a dictator or a Caesar in the making, and he refused to start a Civil War over this.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
He has actually conceded de facto by leaving the White House and letting Biden come in, but not de jure.

I mean this without any malice against Trump. It was the right course of action due to how bad things were. Despite what so many people think he is not a dictator or a Caesar in the making, and he refused to start a Civil War over this.
We are 80 years away from a Caesar moment we haven't even had our second gratche brother yet
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
He has actually conceded de facto by leaving the White House and letting Biden come in, but not de jure.

I mean this without any malice against Trump. It was the right course of action due to how bad things were. Despite what so many people think he is not a dictator or a Caesar in the making, and he refused to start a Civil War over this.
If he stayed in it would have been worse and the left would celebrate as it would make any chance of him getting things to go his way fail worse then they have been up to this point
 

strunkenwhite

Well-known member
I would like a real count of legit votes before I make that determination
Romney won AZ by nine points; Trump won in 2016 by three and a half; Biden allegedly won in 2020 by a smidgen. To dispute the claim "AZ is trending blue lately" you'd have to not just reverse those ten thousand votes but reverse them and then multiply by 9 (vs. 2016) or 20 (vs. 2012).

Isn't it true that the entire sum of ballots being questioned is not sufficient to dispute the claim if you trust the 2016 numbers?
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Romney won AZ by nine points; Trump won in 2016 by three and a half; Biden allegedly won in 2020 by a smidgen. To dispute the claim "AZ is trending blue lately" you'd have to not just reverse those ten thousand votes but reverse them and then multiply by 9 (vs. 2016) or 20 (vs. 2012).

Isn't it true that the entire sum of ballots being questioned is not sufficient to dispute the claim if you trust the 2016 numbers?
The ballots being questioned as of right now all come from a single county; and there are fifteen counties in Arizona. You do the math.
 

strunkenwhite

Well-known member
We're not talking about legitimate votes here; we're talking duplicate votes, people voting from out of state, dead people voting, and votes conjured out of thin air. Population is irrelevant.
So if there are 40,000 unanswered questions about the Maricopa votes, should I also believe that there are likely in the ballpark of 40,000 questions about the votes in Gila, whose current total votes are less than that?

I mean, fundamentally you're suggesting that the smaller counties, mostly deep Republican, are vastly more brazen in their cheating (because the cheating is so much bigger proportional to their population). Without evidence or, come to think of it, even really an identifiable reason. What is that reason?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top