Bidengate in which a meth head son and possible child abuser ruins your political grift

Did you watch the video?

Apparently they were informed about it just as they were interviewing Bubolinski, and wanted it overnighted so they had a producer in NY pick them up for shipment. It was the company that contacted Tucker, and they searched for it, with what sounds like good faith efforts.

It sounds like Tucker has a photo/photos of the documents, or whatever interior packaging they were places in, which they used to search for them. So they may have a limited amount of copies, of who knows what quality, but not enough to substitute for the docs themselves.

Which, as I said before, really means one of two things: either someone in the company is lying, or someone with enough resources to evade the carries security got to them.

I believe the Biden family sent someone after the evidence .
 
Did you watch the video?

Apparently, they were informed about it just as they were interviewing Bubolinski, and wanted it overnighted so they had a producer in NY pick them up for shipment. It was the company that contacted Tucker, and they searched for it, with what sounds like good faith efforts.

It sounds like Tucker has a photo/photos of the documents, or whatever interior packaging they were places in, which they used to search for them. So they may have a limited amount of copies, of who knows what quality, but not enough to substitute for the docs themselves.

Which, as I said before, really means one of two things: either someone in the company is lying, or someone with enough resources to evade the carries security got to them.

I did watch it. That is why I'm calling that producer an idiot.

Why ship documents at all? If they are documents, fax or scan them. Any office can do bulk. You get them immediately. It's not like Tucker is a court of law. If it was a hard drive or something, with a couple hundred gigs of video that might be one thing. But honestly, who but lawyers actually sends originals anymore anyway.
 
I did watch it. That is why I'm calling that producer an idiot.

Why ship documents at all? If they are documents, fax or scan them. Any office can do bulk. You get them immediately. It's not like Tucker is a court of law. If it was a hard drive or something, with a couple hundred gigs of video that might be one thing. But honestly, who but lawyers actually sends originals anymore anyway.
It seems like there may be other copies of those docs, in the hands of people outside Fox.
 
I did watch it. That is why I'm calling that producer an idiot.

Why ship documents at all? If they are documents, fax or scan them. Any office can do bulk. You get them immediately. It's not like Tucker is a court of law. If it was a hard drive or something, with a couple hundred gigs of video that might be one thing. But honestly, who but lawyers actually sends originals anymore anyway.
The producer's a boomer?
 
Yeah, while I've been persuaded by audio evidence of the Biden's corruption, we need to see as much hard evidence as possible. The problem though is that without any sort of authority to designate that these are in fact, papers that prove their corruption, it probably won't make it past the base. Audio and video proof of corruption is always the best, so long as it isn't obviously a spliced fake.
 
So get that guy to send him another copy. If that guy has copies, why not put it up? Let us all see them.
Yeah, while I've been persuaded by audio evidence of the Biden's corruption, we need to see as much hard evidence as possible. The problem though is that without any sort of authority to designate that these are in fact, papers that prove their corruption, it probably won't make it past the base. Audio and video proof of corruption is always the best, so long as it isn't obviously a spliced fake.
Probably because he knows how Twitter is acting towards conservatives and outlets that post said stuff these days. Remember the NY Post is still suspended from Twitter for the initial doc dump.

He may be wanting to post them up on a platform that won't censor them and/or won't be banned from Twitter/FB the second they do.
 
Probably because he knows how Twitter is acting towards conservatives and outlets that post said stuff these days. Remember the NY Post is still suspended from Twitter for the initial doc dump.

He may be wanting to post them up on a platform that won't censor them and/or won't be banned from Twitter/FB the second they do.

That's fine, but keep in mind that even though it's best to drag this out, so the media can't memory hole it, you still need juicy stuff to come out. And it has to come out at least 24-48 hours before the election for the public to properly digest it with the media blackout.
 
I did watch it. That is why I'm calling that producer an idiot.

Why ship documents at all? If they are documents, fax or scan them. Any office can do bulk. You get them immediately. It's not like Tucker is a court of law. If it was a hard drive or something, with a couple hundred gigs of video that might be one thing. But honestly, who but lawyers actually sends originals anymore anyway.
Honestly? I suspect they are lying.

Because they would have to be the biggest idiots on the planet if they were real and they didn't make copies of them before sending the things in the mail.
 
Yes. She's not even that hot. Cute, maybe, with that amount of make-up and styling. Hot? No.

I’m of the belief you could send Hunter or any other corrupt businessman, celebrity or politician amongst the plainest to ugliest and even frumpiest ladies and they would pay millions and even promote that lady

Because they get to feel powerful, more powerful and pleasurable than hiring an actually good looking hooker
 
Set up a drop box using a throwaway email. Blasted it out on social media, and it will be mirrored in minutes. There are dozens of file sharing and hosting sites. It would be like try to fight hornets with a hand gun.

I could do it with 30 minutes and a kinkos.

Why are the people trying to get the docs out so utterly shit at this. You launch the docs out now, and then every outlet will have to get experts on to analyze them. And then you try and get Hunters travel schedule, to prove he was there for the laptop dropoff, along with any nonblind witnesses or footage. You have a week left and the chain of custody is broken. Just release and then analyzing can take up the rest of the news cycle.
 
Last edited:
Honestly? I suspect they are lying.

Because they would have to be the biggest idiots on the planet if they were real and they didn't make copies of them before sending the things in the mail.

Tucker is one of those so deep on the Trump boat that I would not put it past him to lie. It could be a hand at trying to build suspense, paranoia, or just to try and keep attention on the whole scandal. Stealing those documents would have had to of been either a really well-put-together move by the Biden family (which had a high chance of failure given digital copies could exist) or an inside job. I find it hard to believe myself.

That said, this is certainly not good for Joe Biden:


Hunter went from being an almost nobody to being almost as well searched as his father. In the past 7 days, a lot of battleground states have 60-40% Joe vs Hunter hits. That's not a good sign for Biden.

Seriously.

2018 -- 1-2% Hunter Biden in battle ground states.
2019 -- 16-20% Hunted Biden in battle ground states.

The google hits on Hunter have skyrocketed and rival his father.
 
Last edited:
Tucker is one of those so deep on the Trump boat that I would not put it past him to lie. It could be a hand at trying to build suspense, paranoia, or just to try and keep attention on the whole scandal. Stealing those documents would have had to of been either a really well-put-together move by the Biden family (which had a high chance of failure given digital copies could exist) or an inside job. I find it hard to believe myself.

That said, this is certainly not good for Joe Biden:


Hunter went from being an almost nobody to being almost as well searched as his father. In the past 7 days, a lot of battleground states have 60-40% Joe vs Hunter hits. That's not a good sign for Biden.

Seriously.

2018 -- 1-2% Hunter Biden in battle ground states.
2019 -- 16-20% Hunted Biden in battle ground states.

The google hits on Hunter have skyrocketed and rival his father.

If Fox couldn't credibly defend it, then he wouldn't be empathetically calling Joe Biden a liar and criminal on national TV.

The harm they stand to suffer simply outweighs the risk.
 
so to anyone who voted biden, is there any voters remorse?
Honestly, not yet. From my position in the left wing bubble I have the following impressions:

-Laptop thing is a shit show that's probably not true.
-If it is true, it still isn't to scale with my impression of how bad the Trump administration is.

The second part is really important to note I think. If I was convinced Biden was exceptionally personally corrupt, my resigned thought is "well, okay, but Trump's parade of nonsense is still far too long to make me want another four years of it." I am just exhausted by the Trump period on an emotional level; it seems like a blur since he was elected. Some of this might be my diagnosed depression, but in my media bubble there's been an endless wave of feeling baited into a reaction that's left me numb enough that I have trouble caring even if Biden was objectively worse than Trump.

It might be that the mainstream media and my quite liberal parents are more to blame than Trump, but I doubt it. I've been stunned by Trump's longevity since about the time his feuding with a Gold Star family during the Republican primary season and am under the impression that Trump has been trying to get people exhausted as a political strategy. Between "very corrupt relaunch of Obama administration with extra sex abuse" and "four more years" it's pretty hard for me not to go with the former.
 
Honestly, not yet. From my position in the left wing bubble I have the following impressions:

-Laptop thing is a shit show that's probably not true.
-If it is true, it still isn't to scale with my impression of how bad the Trump administration is.

The second part is really important to note I think. If I was convinced Biden was exceptionally personally corrupt, my resigned thought is "well, okay, but Trump's parade of nonsense is still far too long to make me want another four years of it." I am just exhausted by the Trump period on an emotional level; it seems like a blur since he was elected. Some of this might be my diagnosed depression, but in my media bubble there's been an endless wave of feeling baited into a reaction that's left me numb enough that I have trouble caring even if Biden was objectively worse than Trump.

It might be that the mainstream media and my quite liberal parents are more to blame than Trump, but I doubt it. I've been stunned by Trump's longevity since about the time his feuding with a Gold Star family during the Republican primary season and am under the impression that Trump has been trying to get people exhausted as a political strategy. Between "very corrupt relaunch of Obama administration with extra sex abuse" and "four more years" it's pretty hard for me not to go with the former.


and there in lies the problem, you're sick of us and frankly we are sick of you. That leaves us at an impasse. how long can this keep going and how does it ultimately end?
 
Last edited:
and there in lies the problem, you're sick of us and frankly we are sick of you. That leaves us at an impasse. how long can this keep going and how does it ultimately end.
I'm hoping we all forget this nonsense like we did the 1970s. Obviously Biden's not a great choice for that, we need a new Reagan tier political brand in at least one party if not both. From my side the biggest problem with Trump on that end is he fits the playbook used against George W. Bush way better than Bush actually did, which has helped Democrats stay stagnant.
 
and there in lies the problem, you're sick of us and frankly we are sick of you. That leaves us at an impasse. how long can this keep going and how does it ultimately end.


the democratic party and the left cant keep up this kind of pace for another four years.

Its been 4 year of bleeding money, power and influence. For the last what is it 4 months is it five months now? We have had nation wide riots in democratic cities, with DA's and mayors running cover for the rioters. This kind of shit sets your political capital on litteral fire, on top of this you have draconic shut downs in democratic states that are murdering the economy because of a virus with a 99.7 percent survival rate.

If this continues for another 4 years even California will turn red. There is an effort to recall the governor now, another year another 4 years? People will go to sacromento enmass drag out our polititions and murder them in the streets while the cops stand by and do nothing.

This is not a sustainable pace, and in 2 years the baby boomers retire enmass and the age of easy loans and credit for national governments go away forever.

Every body runs out of other peoples money all at once.
 
I'm hoping we all forget this nonsense like we did the 1970s. Obviously Biden's not a great choice for that, we need a new Reagan tier political brand in at least one party if not both. From my side the biggest problem with Trump on that end is he fits the playbook used against George W. Bush way better than Bush actually did, which has helped Democrats stay stagnant.

I'm curious. Have you reviewed any of what's come out? Or listen to the Bobolinzki interview and associate audio? What are your thoughts?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top