Bear Ribs
Well-known member
That's not what begging the question is. Begging the question requires circular reasoning that isn't supported. What I did was provide support with examples ahead of time, literally the polar opposite of begging the question.I 'll answer your begged questions
1)no, that's why we have appeals and then no system is perfect but on average the correct answer is arrived at
2) I would say it's more that some questions are so ill founded that they can not be addresses with any level of seriousness
3)it's possible but we do maintain and update things,
So based on your answers:
1) I find this answer reasonable, but it does in fact open up the question of how much the courts can be trusted in this specific situation. "On average right" is a terrible way to try to figure out "in this situation right." A doctor whose advice kills his patients 40% of the time and heals them 60% is "On average right" but I wouldn't go to him for treatment.
2) This is a poor answer. That's not what lack of standing is. Further, it leads to the greater question, based on your answer can we conclude that you think any questioning of the election is so ill-founded that the courts cannot address it with any level of seriousness?
3) This is irrelevant to the situation at hand. "We might change the rules later" has no bearing on whether this specific situation was fairly judged or not.
All three of your answers suggest that you're committing an Appeal to Authority fallacy, in this case "Trust the Courts" when you can't establish why the courts are trustworthy.
You were literally presented with proof they didn't blocking the entrance and agreed that was the case in your post 7,699 of this thread.I mean, they aren't blockading if you're fine with the clinic hiring bully boys to shove them aside. I would guess you aren't, but maybe I'm wrong?
As for the one elderly woman in particular, there's a difference between out on bail and in a different country on bail. Are you suggesting she was denied bail? I didn't think that was the case but I would be inclined to agree with your outrage if she was. Or are you saying that the guy who ran over that kid (I assume you mean) in fact fled the jurisdiction?