Megadeath
Well-known member
You know @Battlegrinder I'm a bit lost in this twisty mess now, and I'd like to relate this back to how are discussion started. You said that the "right to privacy" was fictitious, and held up as evidence that if it did exist then NSA surveillance would be illegal.
On the one hand, I disagree. I don't think that the government violating some rights under some circumstances in a manner consistent with the law somehow means you never had those rights.
On the other hand, you now seem to be saying that what the NSA does is illegal? So... That would seem to invalidate the part of your argument I initially disagreed with anyway?
On the one hand, I disagree. I don't think that the government violating some rights under some circumstances in a manner consistent with the law somehow means you never had those rights.
On the other hand, you now seem to be saying that what the NSA does is illegal? So... That would seem to invalidate the part of your argument I initially disagreed with anyway?