This argument applies to literally everything in life.
The rich can afford nicer houses. Better crack down on house ownership.
The rich can afford nicer cars. Better crack down on car ownership.
The rich can afford better health care. Better crack down on medical practices.
The question shouldn't be 'can someone with more money benefit more from this?' The question should be 'was their wealth acquired through moral means?'
Indeed.Only alternative to society with rich people is slave society.In other worlds,commies,becouse even secret police there are,in fact,slaves.
Of course,we need to stop oligarchy from ruling,becouse they suck at it,but there is old answer for that - Kings.
Well,in theory people could be ruled by monks,but,as both christian and buddhist cases showed,it usually suck,too.
Althought...Monks estates in South America was much better ruled then other spanish property,and indians there were free and educated.
So,right catholics monks would do...BUT WHERE GET THEM NOW ?
