He won his war, he did exactly what G.H.W. Bush told him to do and liberated Kuwait. Zachowon failed to win his war.
You do realize that no one is buying this "US lost the war in Afghanistan" thing that you've been harping on over for weeks, right? A political decision to leave will not transform into a military defeat no matter how many times you insist otherwise.
The war is practically over.
Yeah, whatever, you've been saying that for weeks over and over again and there's no evidence that it's true. Let's go over you russiaboo fanfiction and see how long it takes you to screw it up and reveal you have no idea what you're talking about.
Ukraine's military and industry is broken.
Well, that was fast.
Leaving aside the military bit, which you don't know and don't cite anything to prove, the fact that you cite there industry being ruined as reason why they've lost immediately proves you have no idea what you're talking about. Please go check your calendar, you should see that the year is 2022 and not sometime in the 1940s. Destroying an enemy's industrial facilities will do next to nothing to impede their ability to wage war, because today, as opposed to the 40s, it takes so long to build and replace military equipment that even with it's industry intact neither Ukraine nor Russia would have only been able to produce a small amount of new equipment, not anywhere near enough to replace destroyed equipment. every weapon that will be used in this war already exists, either in Russia, Ukraine, or a western country on it's way to Ukraine.
Destroyed industry will make it harder for Ukraine to rebuild afterwards, it will have a major impact on their postwar economy and cause hardship postwar, but it will have next to no effect on if they win or lose the war right now.
Everything else you've said is likewise outright fiction or clear evidence you don't know what you're talking about.
causing more economic damage to the EU which stripped itself bare of its reserve stocks to send aid. Given the EU is already fracturing from dealing with Covid, the longer the war lasts, the faster they crumble.
"We're going to this war with our stockpile of equipment, vs Ukraine and it's stockpiles plus the stockpiles of everyone else in the world, and the rest of the world is replacing Ukraine's lost equipment with new stuff while we cannot our own loses, which favors us because reason."
He, wasn't the EU supposed to be having food riots because of the gold standard or something right now, accord to you from last week?
Your inability to understand how Russia fights and wins wars is not my problem.
I don't care what you say here, because you have not demonstrated the slightest bit of military knowledge or understand and so are in no position to offer that critique.
I was clear from the beginning that Kyiv was a double feint, it was quite obvious just from the Terrain and the forces allocated to it vs the South.
Ok, prove it Mr "I tots know army stuff":
Here's a sat photo kyiv, please explain these terrain factors that mean any attack on it must be some kind 4D chess double feint.
And also, please explain what a double feint
is, because I can't seem to find any reference to it online in a military concept, only as a soccer play or fencing move. Now, it's of course possible there is an analogous military ruse, but if there was such a thing I would expect you to use it's proper name, given that you possess enough understanding of military tactics to determine the attack on Kyiv was a ruse based on the local terrain and force disposition.
There was also every indication Russia was employing encrypted radios and satellite uplinks, from photos, and the tendency of Ukraine to claim they killed a General only for them to show back up alive later.
Which Generals were claimed dead and then showed up alive?
Russia also deployed large numbers of decoys, including inflatable trucks to create the infamous convoy which they moved around with a mixture of real trucks.
I can find no evidence of that online, if any of those trucks turned out to just inflatable decoys there should be mention of that somewhere.
Furthermore, while Russia does
have inflatable decoy vehicles, they don't seem to have one that matches the design of the ones in the convey, nor do they appear to have the thousands of them that would be needed for this.
Oh and remember all those UkA commandoes in the first 2 weeks posting tiktoks? Disappeared after 2 weeks because they were essentially light infantry up against roving mechanized kill teams that fixed them in place and pounded them.
Again, I can find nothing outside of your say-say to verify that.
Note the Russians easily broke contact and withdrew in good order and entrained to Donbass and Kharkiv Front where they are once again in combat, without the UkA being aware of it or able to pursue.
Everything I've seen, such as this video says otherwise:
The Russia forces at Kyiv withdrew, under pressure and having taken significant loses, and everyone knows
exactly where they are and where they're going.
Now, that could be wrong, but as your evidence for it "I say so", I don't think I am.
They were able to do that because the UkA lost the bulk of its AFVs and artillery, the majority of their fuel, an the bulk of their ammo. Their commandoes suffered unsustainable causalities attacking Russian Convoys, and civilian insurgents got shredded. Now the UkA in the north is a largely immobile force with technicals, an odd AFV or two, and little artillery that has little ability to move during the day and at the mercy of Russian Night Aviation if they travel in too large of a convoy. They are thus unable to help in any way with regards to the south.
Russia on the other hand can move freely during the day, and pound all day and night with artillery without having to worry about counterfires or CAS very much. With is a massive firepower advantage the Ukrainians can't counter.
Again, I can't find anything to confirm a single word of this as being anything but more of your fanfiction, and what I can find says the exact opposite, such as the previously posted video, which says Ukraine's air defenses are still functional (albeit outmatched) and inflicting heavy losses on Russia aircraft.
I'm particularly curious why you think night or daytime movement matter one bit when it comes to air attack, as modern aircraft and air defense systems function perfectly well in the dark or the day, if Russian airpower is able to interdict daytime movements to the extant you claim, they should be able to do the same at night.
Also the final clue about Kyiv not being the focus is Russia simply not having set up collaborators or sent the victory flags to V and O groups.
It's rather hard to set up collaborators and victory flags in a city you
failed to take.
Troops in the North were allowed to loot unlike in the south where it would be bad for business.
Having soldiers loot from civilians is not only illegal in general, it is specifically an outright internationally recognized
war crime. That you are saying the Russian allowed their men to do that in some areas as a matter of policy again suggest you don't know what you're talking about, as no decent professional army would do that (yeah, looting will inevitably happen anyway, but there's a difference between it happening despite your best efforts and specifically encouraging it).
Additionally, I can't find anything to suggest that Russian military looting or other war crimes are localized the way you claim.
