Maybe I sperged out and I would say that I did impetously replied in an hyperbolic and formulaic language, but look it from my perspective : in Italy at least 3 public figures were likely offed by the CIA, countless coup were approved or "helped" by them in Latina America or elsewhere.
Not all of the world had the USSR or their genocidal puppets.
We had the US and occasionally Albion and France.
So pardon me if I like the Russians more than the NATO parasites.
A lot of arguments can be made
in each individual case about how justified what the CIA did or did not do was. Keep in mind though, that a lot of the context for this is after the USSR created/funded/supported to victory communist takeovers in North Korea, North Vietnam, and
China. That CIA interference is not a black and white case of 'this was never ever justified.'
And that's before you get into the rest of your comparisons.
When Russia/the USSR controlled eastern Europe, they were tyrannical police states that caused human suffering on a level only matched by
other socialist regimes in nazi Germany and Communist China. When the US with NATO allies went into Korea, it cultivated what has become South Korea, the most prosperous and free nation in Eastern Asia. It's not without flaws, but the contrast is stark.
Attempts to repeat the process also clearly failed in Iraq and Afghanistan, but that was a matter of
incompetence, mostly due to lack of understanding of Islamic/Middle Eastern culture and increasingly being slaves to political correctness. They still raised the standard of living and built infrastructure through those nations, even if it all fell apart eventually, the contrast, again, is stark.
NATO has problems. 'The West' as a super-culture has some serious issues, and looks to be in the decline stage of the rise and fall of empires.
It's still
far superior to what the USSR and post-soviet Russia have done,
defintely better than what the CCP is currently up to, and there really isn't any other power or cultural block worth comparing.