Thing is, it ties into something I've noticed with a number of fan artists and other fan creators these days; particularly those who make money off of it. They don't seem to realized that their livelihood is built off of other artists' work that they have no inherent right to use, and only do so at the pleasure of those who actually own it. It's so bad that some of them act like the characters they draw belong to them, such that they see no problem threatening to sue people who repost their work in an image thread on some random forum; even though they themselves would lose any court case brought against them by the people who actually own the characters they're drawing.
interestingengineering.com
Good maybe using super expensive court fees as a way for corporations and governments to step on the less wealthy will soon be a thing of the past obviously this is in early days with just a speeding ticket but I hope for moreIn a world first, AI lawyer will help defend a real case in the US
Individuals fail to take on large organizations since they cannot pay high attorney fees or have the resources to fight bureaucracy.
I welcome our new AI reporters.
Somehow, I find this to be less indicative of the usefulness of ChatGPT and more the uselessness of MBAs.
Possibly, but they're talking about it passing the Bar exam within a year (and we already have one AI Lawyer at work, albeit it's still experimental) and nobody's ever said the Bar exam is easy.
Yeah, I was listening to an AI read some Robert E. Howard yesterday and was quite impressed with how well it managed inflection, rhythm, and tone. We're going to see audiobook readers and voice actors out of work very shortly.
Still fan projects are already better than a lot of what comes out of hollywood I’m looking forward to what passionate people can do with these and even better tools. If the will and a good idea are there eventually individuals or small teams could create wonders. I think voice actors will have to shift to having a larger range of new and strange ways of speaking that they get paid a lump sum to record or maybe they’ll create a voice website like iTunes be like downloading a music file where they get paid royalties for people buying the files so they can use that voice in their own projects. Or a subscription service type deal.
People have yet to comprehend what this means for art and culture in general. What it means is that our creative faculties will atrophy, because people will be so used to just asking AI to amuse them in a very specific way, they won't have any interest in human-generated creative works any longer. It also means that whoever controls these AI content generation platforms will get to shape the culture by deciding what sorts of materials these AIs can actually produce. Ask an AI to produce a decidedly unwoke swashbuckling pulp novel with lots of sex and profanity? We're sorry, that violates our TOS. Would you like this ESG-approved pap instead?
I really doubt it’s going to get that bad I’m sure it’s going to be more an ai human partnership than full ai creating everything wholesale. We as a species will adapt people will still have to come up with the seed idea. Creatives may have start thinking of themselves as garderners knowing which branch to cut and when it’s time to pull it up by the roots. look we all will have to get better at sorting through noise look at media before and after the internet and computer tech like photoshop and digital music makers and the explosion of content that happened there.
