Leftist Child Grooming

Bacle said:

Please do not conflate the fucktards in Cali and NYC with the the entirety of the non-hetero population.

All you do when you do that is make it harder to get the Leftists fucktards out of power.

Click to expand...

I'm not conflating anything.

You can't have a month of incredible sexualized and public celebrations and then pretend it isn't a major part of LGB culture. Because it clearly is, and if the majority of the LGB community disagrees with that, then they should do something about the celebrations being held in their name.

Ixian said:

I'm not conflating anything.

You can't have a month of incredible sexualized and public celebrations and then pretend it isn't a major part of LGB culture. Because it clearly is, and if the majority of the LGB community disagrees with that, then they should do something about the celebrations being held in their name.

Click to expand...

We could, if the corps weren't using 'Pride' to make money and virtue signal, and if T's didn't use it as cover for their bullshit.

The majority of the LGBs just want to live their lives without Bible-thumpers trying to shove them back in the closet and/or lobotomize them. The 'Pride' shit was corpo hijacking of the movement for sales/PR purposes, and then the T's parasite'd themselves onto the movement to try and get top cover for their lies.

Ixian said:

No, I couldn't care less about who fucks who.

But lets not pretend that the movement based nearly entirely on having "pride" in who you choose to have sex with didn't cause the current situation with trans ideology.

When your culture includes a month of heavily sexualized parades meant specifically to include children, you can't then act surprised when shit rolls downhill fast.

The LGB community is on a whole, toxic and hedonistic. If it was just as simple as them wanting equal treatment under the law and to be able to love and make love to who they wished, none of this would be occurring.

Click to expand...

I do not know if I would go as far as that, but there is a large number of hedonisms within the gay community that they never really denounced it and it has helped carry them forward. Yet at the same time, we also need to acknowledge that pedophiles will infiltrate any group or organization that can get them access to children. They are rife within the school system and even the Catholic Church is not safe from their grasp.

EDIT

And I'm working off TWITTER's gay community, which is mostly just feminists, so I've somewhat changed my mind on what I said previously. I'm still not happy with LGB, because I think they have a serious fucking problem with hedonists in their community and it needs to be addressed.

Anyway, it's about time that something is being done from their end.

Bacle said:

LGB mostly just do not want to go back to the Stonewall and forced lobotomy days, not remake all of society to fit them and their lies like T's do.

Click to expand...

They do, actually, at least since pedophiles have infiltrated the movement.

Why do you think adoption for gay couples is such a hot topic?

Bacle said:

We could, if the corps weren't using 'Pride' to make money and virtue signal, and if T's didn't use it as cover for their bullshit.

The majority of the LGBs just want to live their lives without Bible-thumpers trying to shove them back in the closet and/or lobotomize them. The 'Pride' shit was corpo hijacking of the movement for sales/PR purposes, and then the T's parasite'd themselves onto the movement to try and get top cover for their lies.

Click to expand...

Which, honestly, I believe.

The problem is the lack of denouncement and to a lesser degree, the sheer support of the LGB community for the corporatization of their culture.

Aldarion said:

They do, actually, at least since pedophiles have infiltrated the movement.

Why do you think adoption for gay couples is such a hot topic?

Click to expand...

... And straights never rape their kids? Oh, or maybe don't judge a group by their worst members.

Bacle said:

We could, if the corps weren't using 'Pride' to make money and virtue signal, and if T's didn't use it as cover for their bullshit.

The majority of the LGBs just want to live their lives without Bible-thumpers trying to shove them back in the closet and/or lobotomize them. The 'Pride' shit was corpo hijacking of the movement for sales/PR purposes, and then the T's parasite'd themselves onto the movement to try and get top cover for their lies.

Click to expand...

The 'Pride shit' as you call it, wasn't a corpo stunt. It existed back when gays were still shunned, and it's entire point was to shock people into admitting that gays existed. It was loud, obnoxious, and sexual by design. As quiet protests did nothing.

It was the first of a successful 2 step process to go from denying gays existed while stomping on the ones that were found, to admitting they exist and disliking them, to acceptance.

The celebrities coming out followed by corpo shit? That was the second step. Now that gays existed, and made money, capitalism catered to them to the extent that they spent, and it was leveraged into acceptance. Something to throw in the face of any gay commie is that gays only got accepted because of capitalism. This is also where 'representation matters' comes from. It absolutely did have a positive impact on gay people's image in the wider world (the sassy gay character wasn't a freaky sexual deviant, for example), and gays would buy things because they were gay.

But now we are left with vestigial organs of obnoxious pride parades that aren't useful and 'representation in media' now at the expense of straight characters.

As for it lasting a month instead of a day, that's because the initial pride parades weren't organized, and just happened whenever over June and into early July. Honestly, someone just stepping in and standardizing the day, and it'd be fine.

The Original Sixth said:

I do not know if I would go as far as that, but there is a large number of hedonisms within the gay community that they never really denounced it and it has helped carry them forward. Yet at the same time, we also need to acknowledge that pedophiles will infiltrate any group or organization that can get them access to children. They are rife within the school system and even the Catholic Church is not safe from their grasp.

EDIT

And I'm working off TWITTER's gay community, which is mostly just feminists, so I've somewhat changed my mind on what I said previously. I'm still not happy with LGB, because I think they have a serious fucking problem with hedonists in their community and it needs to be addressed.

Anyway, it's about time that something is being done from their end.

Click to expand...

Keep in mind that living in secracy does horrible things to relationships.

A lot of gay people are only now being able and allowed to have healthy ones, the hedonism thing is petering out with time as gay people learn how to have more healthy relationships. And by that I mean it will most likely go down to strait levels.

Cherico said:

Keep in mind that living in secracy does horrible things to relationships.

A lot of gay people are only now being able and allowed to have healthy ones, the hedonism thing is petering out with time as gay people learn how to have more healthy relationships. And by that I mean it will most likely go down to strait levels.

Click to expand...

Will it? Because it seems like it's only ramping up, with known academics pushing for "minor attracted persons" acceptance, drag shows for (and sometimes by) children, and pride parades that become more sexual every year.

Sure there seems to be some pushback from the LGB community, but no where near a majority.

Abhorsen said:

... And straights never rape their kids? Oh, or maybe don't judge a group by their worst members.

Click to expand...

They are bad enough even without pedophiles. But I judge them here because they are giving cover to their worst members.

LGBT has been thoroughly infiltrated by pedophiles, and are doing nothing about it. As a matter of fact, nearly entire movement is pushing through policies that are designed to assist pedophiles, and some groups are even openly pushing for the acceptance of pedophilia.

And yes, prevalence of pedophilia among LGBT is about twice the prevalence in the general population. But as I said, that is not the worst problem here.

Anyway:

The Original Sixth said:

And I'm working off TWITTER's gay community, which is mostly just feminists, so I've somewhat changed my mind on what I said previously. I'm still not happy with LGB, because I think they have a serious fucking problem with hedonists in their community and it needs to be addressed.

Click to expand...

Ixian said:

Will it? Because it seems like it's only ramping up, with known academics pushing for "minor attracted persons" acceptance, drag shows for (and sometimes by) children, and pride parades that become more sexual every year.

Sure there seems to be some pushback from the LGB community, but no where near a majority.

Click to expand...

Yeah, to add on to Cherico's point, hedonism is way down from where it was, and has been on a constant downward trajectory. That's not saying it's in a great place now, it's more that you don't get how bad it was. That gays tend to end up in monogamous relationships is frankly, a huge improvement vs. the previous norm of casual public sex at least once a day, sometimes in a empty tractor trailer, or if you were classy, in a bathhouse.

There have been rapid strides to normalicy as gays stopped being in the shadows.

As for stuff dealing with children, it's a new thing. But LGBTs were some of the first to actually call it out when it began years ago (as they were the first ones to notice it as it happened near them), and the rate at which it's picking up stream despite all the leftists with mainstream news power working in the opposite direction is encouraging. It's not perfect because it won't be instant, but then no movement ever will be.

Abhorsen said:

Yeah, to add on to Cherico's point, hedonism is way down from where it was, and has been on a constant downward trajectory. That's not saying it's in a great place now, it's more that you don't get how bad it was. That gays tend to end up in monogamous relationships is frankly, a huge improvement vs. the previous norm of casual public sex at least once a day, sometimes in a empty tractor trailer, or if you were classy, in a bathhouse.

There have been rapid strides to normalicy as gays stopped being in the shadows.

As for stuff dealing with children, it's a new thing. But LGBTs were some of the first to actually call it out when it began years ago (as they were the first ones to notice it as it happened near them), and the rate at which it's picking up stream despite all the leftists with mainstream news power working in the opposite direction is encouraging. It's not perfect because it won't be instant, but then no movement ever will be.

Click to expand...

I have a hard time believing that. I expect there were LGB people doing the right thing, but as a movement? They didn't do a damn thing. Not that I saw.

Ixian said:

Which, honestly, I believe.

The problem is the lack of denouncement and to a lesser degree, the sheer support of the LGB community for the corporatization of their culture.

Click to expand...

Because the fact is many have very little reason to hate what the corpo's are doing, unless they hate corpo's to begin with.

LGBs are more likely to be angry about T lies than about Pride month stuff, because having companies 'celebrate' them is less of a hassle than when T's try to force them to say 'a man can be a woman' or vice versa.

And when the people demanding LGBs denounce 'Pride' month, or stuff like, are often the same people who dislike LGB's/LGB stuff in general...why would many LGB's give a fuck about appeasing people they see as viewing them as 'degenerates' just for being non-hetero in the first place?

Abhorsen said:

... And straights never rape their kids? Oh, or maybe don't judge a group by their worst members.


The 'Pride shit' as you call it, wasn't a corpo stunt. It existed back when gays were still shunned, and it's entire point was to shock people into admitting that gays existed. It was loud, obnoxious, and sexual by design. As quiet protests did nothing.

It was the first of a successful 2 step process to go from denying gays existed while stomping on the ones that were found, to admitting they exist and disliking them, to acceptance.

The celebrities coming out followed by corpo shit? That was the second step. Now that gays existed, and made money, capitalism catered to them to the extent that they spent, and it was leveraged into acceptance. Something to throw in the face of any gay commie is that gays only got accepted because of capitalism. This is also where 'representation matters' comes from. It absolutely did have a positive impact on gay people's image in the wider world (the sassy gay character wasn't a freaky sexual deviant, for example), and gays would buy things because they were gay.

But now we are left with vestigial organs of obnoxious pride parades that aren't useful and 'representation in media' now at the expense of straight characters.

As for it lasting a month instead of a day, that's because the initial pride parades weren't organized, and just happened whenever over June and into early July. Honestly, someone just stepping in and standardizing the day, and it'd be fine.

Click to expand...

I do not think that 'shock people into admitting gays existed' was necessary, even then, and that needing it to be overtly sexual was a misstep.

People knew they existed, knew what they did, and yes, quiet protests weren't working that well, but overtly sexualizing this issue, instead of making it about a 'live and let live' regarding things done in private, has been a mistake in the long run.

The whole 'Pride' idea is fucking poisonous; someone's sexuality should only concern them and their partners, not be a source of 'pride'. If I never saw another rainbow flag, I'd be perfectly happy, because those who fly them often are just making things worse for the LGBs who do not make their sexuality the centerpiece of their identity.

Ixian said:

Will it? Because it seems like it's only ramping up, with known academics pushing for "minor attracted persons" acceptance, drag shows for (and sometimes by) children, and pride parades that become more sexual every year.

Sure there seems to be some pushback from the LGB community, but no where near a majority.

Click to expand...

It is only 'ramping up' in places like Cali and NYC, or in the same Irovy Towers that have destroyed much of the US with their stupidity in other subjects.

Now, the MAP shit is unacceptable, and I think the reason more LGBs don't rail against it is because quite simply, most people who know what MAP means are on the Right and trying to fight against it. The whole MAP issues is rather ignored by most of the Left, or not mentioned at all, so there are LGBs who will simply not know about what those stupid, pedo prof's are pushing because they are not hooked into the same news feeds we are.

You want more push back against MAPs, then actually bring the issue up with LGBs who may not know about it, and I expect most will share your disgust at what is trying to be done with that stuff.

MAPs sure as shit aren't being given cover by the LGB movement, they are another parasite cause trying to use the LGBs as top-cover, just like the Ts have.

The Original Sixth said:

I have a hard time believing that. I expect there were LGB people doing the right thing, but as a movement? They didn't do a damn thing. Not that I saw.

Click to expand...

You assume that every LGB person knows about the MAP shit, instead of it being a rather new issue that, outside Right Wing circles, just isn't making that much news, because few other political groups have much reason to look for reasons to give non-hetero's a hard time in the first place.

I seriously think people here do not realize how few people, straight or not, know about those prof's trying to push MAP shit.

Bacle said:

MAPs sure as shit aren't being given cover by the LGB movement, they are another parasite cause trying to use the LGBs as top-cover, just like the Ts have.
You assume that every LGB person knows about the MAP shit, instead of it being a rather new issue that, outside Right Wing circles, just isn't making that much news, because few other political groups have much reason to look for reasons to give non-hetero's a hard time in the first place.

I seriously think people here do not realize how few people, straight or not, know about those prof's trying to push MAP shit.

Click to expand...

I have a hard time accepting that argument. This stuff is being pushed at their events. And instead of banning those people and denouncing them as loudly and forcibly as possible, they've become the main attraction for irresponsible parents to expose their children to sexual abuse.

I am not accusing every or even most LGBs of being involved in this, but this is not some obscure minority. The LGB leadership did nothing, their activists did nothing, and all signs show that they support this behavior. This isn't just infiltration. This is aiding and abetting the enemy of children by a non-insignificant part of the LGB. We didn't let the Church off the hook when they were caught switching their pedo-priests around, we shouldn't accept it from the LGB groups.

The Original Sixth said:

I have a hard time believing that. I expect there were LGB people doing the right thing, but as a movement? They didn't do a damn thing. Not that I saw.

Click to expand...

Which part? The overall normalization? That's just plain facts.

The MAP shit? First, some of the T's were the first to call this out, notably Blaire White and Rose of Dawn, off the top of my head. Second, as a group (not talking about the movement, which hard to quantify and tell who's a part of it and who isn't, though I'd say that most gays aren't a part of the movement nowadays), they are turning away from wokeness. Trump got a record number of gay votes for a republican president in 2020, about 20-30%. I expect that this number the next presidential election.

Bacle said:

I do not think that 'shock people into admitting gays existed' was necessary, even then, and that needing it to be overtly sexual was a misstep.

Click to expand...

It absolutely was. At the time, it was easy for everyone to just pretend that there weren't gays. Really easy. Or at least that they were shockingly rare. And hiding doesn't work. So they had to come out in force and be loud and in your face.

The Original Sixth said:

I have a hard time accepting that argument. This stuff is being pushed at their events. And instead of banning those people and denouncing them as loudly and forcibly as possible, they've become the main attraction for irresponsible parents to expose their children to sexual abuse.

I am not accusing every or even most LGBs of being involved in this, but this is not some obscure minority. The LGB leadership did nothing, their activists did nothing, and all signs show that they support this behavior. This isn't just infiltration. This is aiding and abetting the enemy of children by a non-insignificant part of the LGB. We didn't let the Church off the hook when they were caught switching their pedo-priests around, we shouldn't accept it from the LGB groups.

Click to expand...

You may have a hard time accepting that, but it is the truth; the MAP stuff (at least knowledge of academics pushing it) is not even close to widely accepted in the LGB community, and most LGBs likely don't even know some people are trying to push NAMBLA 2.0.

You may want to realize the LGB 'movement' is loose, diffuse, and not everyone in it knows all the dirty laundry/insanity being pushed by fringe academics.

I have no problem with people informing LGBs about the insanity of MAPs however, because it is a good way to separate the benign LGBs from the predators. Only predators/pedo's will try to excuse the MAP shit, instead of rail against it.

Abhorsen said:

was. At the time, it was easy for everyone to just pretend that there weren't gays. Really easy. Or at least that they were shockingly rare. And hiding doesn't work. So they had to come out in force and be loud and in your face.

Click to expand...

I still think that this is an exaggeration.

Abhorsen said:

It absolutely was. At the time, it was easy for everyone to just pretend that there weren't gays. Really easy. Or at least that they were shockingly rare. And hiding doesn't work. So they had to come out in force and be loud and in your face.

Click to expand...

Problem is that gay organizations today are loud and in your face about wanting to fuck children under the guise of "equality" and "adoption".

Slippery slope is real, and we are already most of the way down to hell.

Aldarion said:

Problem is that gay organizations today are loud and in your face about wanting to fuck children under the guise of "equality" and "adoption".

Slippery slope is real, and we are already most of the way down to hell.

Click to expand...

You mean were not in hell already?

Cherico said:

You mean were not in hell already?

Click to expand...

Eh, Hell has a lot of circles.

The first known case of human-to-dog #monkeypox transmission, has been documented in the medical journal, The Lancet. The dog caught it from its owners, a non-monogamous gay couple in Paris. The greyhound developed an anal ulceration & mucocutaneous lesions.





Things That Make You Go Hmmmm.... Of course, it's possible that the dog just liked its owner's faces and then its butt...maybe.

Pennsylvania Dem John Fetterman Hires Activist That Wants Transgender Surgeries For Children

Pennsylvania lieutenant governor John Fetterman’s (D.) campaign for Senate is tapping a far-left activist who has called allowing children to undergo surgical gender transitions a matter of "human rights."

The Fetterman campaign launched Real Doctors Against Oz Wednesday, an initiative meant to discredit Mehmet Oz, the Republican nominee for Senate. Val Arkoosh is among the activists taking shots at Oz. Arkoosh, a failed Senate candidate, has a history of pushing gender theory. When she was still a candidate for Senate, Arkoosh sent out an email calling a parent’s right to refuse "gender affirming care" for their children a "gross violation of both human rights and the relationship between a patient and their doctor." She also falsely claims that it’s legal to discriminate against transgender individuals in employment.

Sixty percent of Americans believe that a person cannot change their gender and a plurality of Americans oppose giving hormone blockers to children. Democratic opposition to parental rights has not worked out well for the party in past elections. Many pundits attribute Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin’s (R.) upset victory in November 2021 to his focus on expanding parental rights.

Real Doctors Against Oz are criticizing Oz for having ties to the pharmaceutical industry, being pro-life, and promoting supplements during his time as a television host. Oz, meanwhile, is attacking Fetterman for avoiding Pennsylvania voters by running a "John Fetterman Basement Tracker" cataloging the amount of time since his last public event.

Despite the implication of the name of Fetterman’s group, Oz is a real doctor. He graduated from an Ivy League medical school and was later a professor of surgery at Columbia University, where he won a research award.

Click to expand...

Insanity! Pennsylvania Dept. of Education Provides Students with Preferred-Personal Pronouns ‘Ne, Ve, Ze, and Xe,’ and Asserts that Even 3-Year-Olds Can Identify as Transgender

According to the Pennsylvania Department of Education, children as young as three years old can identify themselves as transgender, and the department recognizes the pronouns “ne, ve, ze/zie, and xe” as valid options for use.

As stated on the Department of Education’s website in the section titled “Creating Gender-Inclusive Schools and Classrooms,” teachers are urged to inquire as to their students’ preferred pronouns to prevent making inaccurate assumptions about their gender identities.

“In addition to the traditional pronouns (he/him, she/her, they), some people prefer to use gender-neutral pronouns, such as ne, ve, ze/zie and xe,” according to the website. “If you don’t know a student’s preferred personal pronoun, it’s always best to ask.”

The website also provides a definition of “binary gender” as the “faulty concept that there are only two genders: male and female.”

TRENDING: This is Why Democrats Are Not Worried about 2020 -- The Fix Is In... Postal Service Institutionalizes Ballot Interference Scheme with New Mail-in Ballot Division

From Pennsylvania’s Department of Education:

Gender Diversity: Words You Should Know

• Assigned Gender: The gender a baby is given upon birth, usually based on the child’s birth sex.
• Binary Gender: The faulty concept that there are only two genders: male and female.
• Birth Sex/Biological Sex: A specific set of genetic, chemical and anatomical characteristics that we are either born with or that develop as we mature.
• Cisgender: Describes a person whose birth sex and gender identity align.
• Genderqueer: A broad descriptor many people use to indicate a person does not identify as either male or female.
• Gender Expression/Gender Presentation: How we show our gender to the world through external choices (e.g. dress, behavior, hairstyle).
• Gender Identity: How we feel about our gender in our hearts and minds.
• Preferred Personal Pronouns: In addition to the traditional pronouns (he/him, she/her, they), some people prefer to use gender-neutral pronouns, such as ne, ve, ze/zie and xe. If you don’t know a student’s preferred personal pronoun, it’s always best to ask.
• Transgender: Describes anyone whose gender identity and birth sex do not align. The word should be used as, “transgender,” not “transgendered.” For example, “My brother Sam is transgender. His birth name was Samantha.”

Click to expand...

More from Fox News:

The definitions on the education department website were cited from a 2013 article by Carrie Kilman called “The Gender Spectrum,” which claims that “some kids know their gender identities and birth sexes don’t match almost as soon as they begin to talk” and that kids are capable of identifying as gender-fluid as young as 3.

Click to expand...

“This article shares research and insights on how gender identity differs from biological sex, and how educators can help support students who are gender non-conforming or gender expansive,” the PDE website says about Kilman’s article.

The education department webpage, which is intended as a resource guide for educators, also includes a lesson guide for teachers to host a “gender-neutral day” in their classrooms for grades 3-12.
The guide says that as part of the activity, students should pick two to three ways they will reject gender stereotypes for the day, and the teacher should make specific commitments to challenge gender norms in the classroom.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Groomer alert: Half-naked man teaches young boy how to use stripper pole at Pennsylvania pride event celebrated by Gov. Wolf

A video posted by the Twitter account Libs of TikTok has once again ignited the ire of concerned parents and citizens across social media. The video in question features a young boy dancing on a stripper pole at a Pennsylvania pride event, while a half-naked man and other spectators cheer him on.

The TikTok video, posted by an account which calls itself @realfatworls***, features a young boy, who appears to be about 11 or 12 years in age, wearing a rainbow-colored tutu skirt, tube socks, a t-shirt, and a rainbow-colored headband. The boy takes several turns twirling his body around the pole, while others clap and cheer.

The most notable cheerleader in the audience is a fully-grown man, wearing no shirt and very short shorts, who gives the young boy pointers about technique. The man adjusts the boy's feet, then smiles and claps as he watches the boy perform.

The caption on the video itself reads, "Central PA Pride had a pole set up with an amazing instructor to assist. My kiddo is a natural!" suggesting that @realfatworls*** is one of the boy's parents.

Libs of TikTok also noted — as did the website for the Pride Festival of Central Pennsylvania — that Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf wrote a letter expressing his support for the event. In the letter, Wolf described it as an "example of conviction, compassion, and camaraderie [which] will inspire others for years to come."

The festival website also cautioned event attendees to dress and comport themselves in a way that would "respect public decency." In response to a FAQ regarding dress code, the website stated, "As the Pride Festival continues to grow, more patrons bring their families with small children. With this in mind, please respect public decency." To that end, the group prohibited:

• Visible underwear or what appears to be underwear
• G-Strings
• Speedos
• Loin cloths
• BDSM attire or accessories that highlight genitalia or buttocks

Critics on social media have swiftly condemned the video — and the event.
Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire tweeted, "I will never support any Republican candidate on any level of government who does not pledge to use every available legal means to put a stop to this sort of thing and punish all those responsible."
Columnist Auron MacIntyre wrote, "Some civilizations deserve to collapse."
Many responses made blatant reference to the word "groomer," while others have only alluded to it because Twitter has banned accounts for using it.

Click to expand...

Oh HELL NO. Not in my state!