Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

TheRomanSlayer

Kayabangan, Dugo, at Dangal
Obvious Russia cheerleader, if that's your thing, sure, but why...
If you want objectivity, waste of time.
HistoryLegends' other videos that weren't related to Ukraine are indeed interesting, but is there evidence that he's cheerleading for Russia?
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
HistoryLegends' other videos that weren't related to Ukraine are indeed interesting, but is there evidence that he's cheerleading for Russia?
Yes, look at his choice of titles alone. Lots of hyping about real and even potential Russian successes, like the mythical encirclement of a huge chunk of Ukrainian army in the east that Russia shills were predicting since day 1... But none on Ukrainian ones.
Lots of debunking of Ukraine favoring information - from what i've looked, not very good at that.
None for the opposite.
Can you spot a pattern here?
There’s no evidence, it’s just anything that happened is positive in Marduk’s world for Russia must be dismissed, evidence here damned.
Frankly, from what was seen of you discussing military matters here, there is no evidence that you are able to properly judge evidence about such matters.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Given how consistently you’ve shown a lack of basic knowledge on any topic you’ve spoke on, I consider this the highest praise.
Enjoy your alternate reality life then.
Titles are often bait and switch. I did look at his older videos though, with titles that sounded like Russia's experiencing difficulties.
And then he goes back to hyping them up, just as the situation becomes less and less dynamic. There are also just plainly dishonest points made specifically against Ukrainian claims like this, where by hard info the honest thing to say is "can't say anything for sure, both sides use improvised armor addons that can be standarized or one of a kind, and sometimes they even use captured vehicles", but he claims for sure that it can't be a Russian vehicle, because it doesn't use standardized 675-sb3KDZ kit cage armor, just some improvised variant.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
History Learner you are compeltly horrible at understanding basic analysis.

You would fail the 35F AIT let alone any actual analysis classes that would be offered.

The stupidest guy in my AIT who failed out was better.

Gonna get hit domt care.

That aside, I do not beilive in game changing weapons. Just ones that prolong and allow for advantages to be given.

HIMARS for instance is the weapon that has caused destruction of ammo depots. Invaluable for quick rearm at the rront compared to that of far away ones that take hours to get armed from
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
That aside, I do not beilive in game changing weapons. Just ones that prolong and allow for advantages to be given.

HIMARS for instance is the weapon that has caused destruction of ammo depots. Invaluable for quick rearm at the rront compared to that of far away ones that take hours to get armed from
It has outsize effect because for Ukraine HIMARS is not just a new weapon, it's practically a new capability. For US forces, it's just one precision weapon among many air and sea launched, nevermind old land based ATACMS. Better in some regards, worse in others.
For Ukraine it's a capability jump, they had nothing like it before. The closest thing they had was Tochka-U, which they were using in similar ways - it's a bit longer ranged and has a bigger warhead, however it's much less accurate (at least 10x bigger CEP), also less mobile, has much slower re-fire rate, and last but not least, Ukraine has started the war with ~500 of these missiles and no way to get more (compared to launcher number they could have fired them off within few days if they didn't care about conserving ammo), while HIMARS is in production and further ammo shipments will come, so it has also lifted the need to reserve some leftovers of leftovers of ammo for hypothetical extreme need or opportunity, allowing wider and more consistent use of tactical missile class weapons.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
History Learner you are compeltly horrible at understanding basic analysis.

You would fail the 35F AIT let alone any actual analysis classes that would be offered.

The stupidest guy in my AIT who failed out was better.

Gonna get hit domt care.

That aside, I do not beilive in game changing weapons. Just ones that prolong and allow for advantages to be given.

HIMARS for instance is the weapon that has caused destruction of ammo depots. Invaluable for quick rearm at the rront compared to that of far away ones that take hours to get armed from

Cool story Glowie:
Am I the only one that remembers all yhe Pro Russians were like "Kiev falls within a week, 3 days minimum"
Now...
Looks like even Kherson will fall
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Am I the only one that remembers all yhe Pro Russians were like "Kiev falls within a week, 3 days minimum"
Now...
Looks like even Kherson will fall

Russian nationalist and Russotriuphalist blogger predicted that Kiev will fall in 48 hours, that there will be 90% odds that the major fighting will be over in seven days or less (throughout all of Ukraine), and that there will be no large-scale Ukrainian insurgency because Ukrainians aren't breeding enough and in any case can simply move to Poland and/or the West instead of staying put and fighting Russia.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member

I oppose this. I think that Russian refugees and also Russians who dislike Putin's regime SHOULD, in fact, be able to move to the West. I support strip-mining Russia of as much of its human capital as possible, especially but not only its working-age human capital, and thus support generously depopulating Russia by having as much of their population as possible move over here to the West. Russian spies would be excluded from this, of course.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top