I'm sorry.
How come they have not made Ukrainian Air space have no Ukrainian planes hmm?
S-400s are overhyped and untested against a true air force.
Well, given the results we're seeing either it's somewhat useful but they don't have enough, or they do have enough but it's not that good. Either way, it's hardly proving decisive on the battlefield.So far has much better results than the Patriot system.
S-400 has been used with considerable success to intercept missiles and some of the few Ukrainian aircraft.
I mean, it hasn't helped stop attacks on Russian soilSo far has much better results than the Patriot system.
S-400 has been used with considerable success to intercept missiles and some of the few Ukrainian aircraft.
But what ab9ut the amazing SHORAD they have?Some very low altitude attacks done with helicopters that fly a few meters altitude?
No system has 100% efficiency.
So far has much better results than the Patriot system.
S-400 has been used with considerable success to intercept missiles and some of the few Ukrainian aircraft.
Some very low altitude attacks done with helicopters that fly a few meters altitude?
No system has 100% efficiency.
I'm sorry.
How come they have not made Ukrainian Air space have no Ukrainian planes hmm?
S-400s are overhyped and untested against a true air force.
But we don't have the examples to prove thatThe Russians do make excellent SAM systems, That's the only place that they have the US beat really.
And now Russia won't even be able to make said SAMs, because Taiwan cut off their microchip supplies and other nations cut off the stuff Russia needs for it's high-end weapons.But we don't have the examples to prove that
But we don't have the examples to prove that
Oh? I mean I heard about them shooting down coalition planes but not US.The S-300 has proven itself a lot over the years, Its even shot down US planes a few times in different countries that had it.
The missiles are fine in their their flight parameters. But so are many others, The electronic guts, however, are what makes the difference beyond that, and that stuff tends to be very classified and hard to compare.The Russians do make excellent SAM systems, That's the only place that they have the US beat really.
Like in many other areas, their training is lacking and large scale C3I stuff is in the 80's at best. I've read somewhere that they still have problems coordinating between own airforce and air defense, so usually they just have only one of the above operate in any given area at the same time.Oh? I mean I heard about them shooting down coalition planes but not US.
And the S-300 still seems to fail in Russian hands
Pro-Ukraine:What I see when I occasionally taking a look at all of the DebilZov idiots I am blocking.
you need artillery, not Javelins. Ukraine is being hammered into dust by russian artillery.
In reality their artillery is well maintained and modern, using large amounts of drone spotters
planefag said:Jesus Christ the slaughter of Russian recon drones has redoubled: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] See also this ORLAN-10 pattern drone in the livery of Russiaās civilian Emergency Situations Ministry (essentially federal-level firefighting service; usually used against seasonal wildfires.) (Another one from May 1st.)
Note these are all from April 30th at the earliest ā just the last 12 days or so.
Itās not entirely one-way, mind ā see this Sparrow tactical UAV downed by Russia ā but I havenāt seen Ukraine resorting to re-staging previously destroyed assets as small as backpack tactical recon drones to try and present them as new losses, either.
which is why they are dominating the artillery battle.