I'm curious as well. A lot will depend on Twitter's own internal rules for decision making, and more on unknown factors in the other stockholders It's plausible that there is a free speech bloc among the other shareholders and Musk's purchase took 9% from the censorship bloc and granted it to them, taking them from a minority to a majority group. It's also possible that now he has to play some political horse-trading with several other blocs (There really aren't any individuals with large enough shares to stand next to Musk, even Jack Dorsey's only got 2.5%) and see if he can get a sufficient number of voters with him to get a majority that way.
I'm not; a lot of major corporations, especially those involved in media, don't seem to care about profits at all these days. They're most interested in the power and control their products affords them.
A lot of people are saying that he didn't join the Board because he plans to buy more shares, and if you're on the Board? You're capped at 12.5%.
