Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Chiron

Well-known member
The Georgians weren't pushovers? Fought hard? They essentially abandoned their tanks and ran without a fight as I recall.

They fought for 12 days and adding up the puppet forces to the Russian Totals, they had a 1 to 1 exchange in losses. The Georgian President threw in the towel before its military did.

Ukraine is not broken yet, and so far seems to be capable of bloodying the Russian's nose just fine.

It has already effectively lost. They can sting, but the Russians are not allowing them time to organize defenses and accepting losses to quickly pocket the Ukrainian Army.

ISIS still exists and have attacked Syrian forces literally this month. If that's what you consider a victory, then the US absolutely DESTROYED the Taliban, since it broke their grip over the country much faster and with much less reliance on proxy forces (the Syrians, Hezbollah, Kurds), and no other superpower shouldering part of the burden (the US).

I didn't say they were defeated, only they have stood up well, lasting longer than the Chechs did in the battle phase before the insurgency phase started. As it is ISIS lacks the means to take territorial control in the Levant at the moment and its main fronts are in Africa, largely forgotten in all the other conflicts brewing there.

If the Russians ever intended to leave (higher ability to say "fuck you" to theor own population's wishes, being a dictatorship and all) we would've seen how long it would've taken ISIS to take vast swathes of Syria again. My guess is: not long.

The Syrian Arab Republic Military is a far different beast now. Years of combat, Darwinism, good habits rubbed into them by Hezbollah and Iranian training and a complete re-equipping by Russia has resulted in a far better Army. Assad burnt his country down to do so, but ISIS doesn't have the networks of civilian collaborators to operate with like it used to.

Not even going to talk about Saddam's Iraq, which the US absolutely flattened.

So? Iran won, puppetized Iraq under the US's nose, and brazenly looted US equipment supplied to the Iraqi Military in broad daylight.

If you're going to compare an invasion to an occupation, then you're a propagandist and we have nothing to talk about. Either compare an invasion to an invasion, an occupation to an occupation, or GTFO.

You are playing semantics. They are one and the same. A war only ends when the enemy is pacified and stops resisting.

Whatever you say mr. armchair general.

I look at actual results. The US lost Iraq and Afghanistan. Mayhap we need to reassess the US Military's actual ability to win wars in an honest way don't you think?
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Anybody got a good summary of why Putin is doing this?
What is he gaining domestically?
If this not the right thread - should I ask about the political side of the conflict in the "Politics" forum?
Protests are happening all over Russia.
We have yet to see the proof of that.

Of course, the Russians also have to win the occupation as well.
They wont
That's because they pick their enemies carefully, and because they usually have more freedom of operation far from the eyes of the press, and less say for their own population. None of these advantages means anything in a conventional war with a western country.
The US has not lost militarily, only politically
Yep, absolutely. Let's see just how much of a resistance, either active or semi-passive (think Solidarity in Poland in the 1980s), the Ukrainians will subsequently put up under Russian occupation.

Anyway, it's quite interesting. Russia has been on a roll over the last 25 years:

2000s: Defeated the Chechen separatists
2008: Crushed Georgia
2014: Annexed Crimea and saved the Donbass separatists from total destruction
2016: Got Donald Trump elected US President
2022: Invaded Ukraine and will likely overthrow the existing Ukrainian government
They paid off the Chechens
Georgiia wasnt ready


Also, apperetnly Azov has been wiped out
 

Chiron

Well-known member
We had people willing to fight every damn day. We were winning every battle left and right. We hadnt had any major injuries in years in the middle east since Trump until the pullout

Utterly irrelevant, you did actually lose some battles, and the Taliban are still holding the country and laughing.

A little humility, self-reflection, and with less jingoism please. At the end of the day, we tax payers decide if you even have a job, and if you can't win wars, why should we continue to pay your salaries as oppose to firing you and finding someone who can win a war?
 

Batrix2070

RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
Utterly irrelevant, you did actually lose some battles, and the Taliban are still holding the country and laughing.

A little humility, self-reflection, and with less jingoism please. At the end of the day, we tax payers decide if you even have a job, and if you can't win wars, why should we continue to pay your salaries as oppose to firing you and finding someone who can win a war?
Specifically, the U.S. has won battles time and time again but has it won those wars? What were you guys really fighting them for like that over there? If you were to introduce Liberal Democracy you would get screwed over big time. When the Soviets put in their regime, at least they didn't have to turn half the country into rubble to do it. And they were able to hold on for a while realistically!
 

GoldRanger

May the power protect you
Founder
They fought for 12 days and adding up the puppet forces to the Russian Totals, they had a 1 to 1 exchange in losses. The Georgian President threw in the towel before its military did.



It has already effectively lost. They can sting, but the Russians are not allowing them time to organize defenses and accepting losses to quickly pocket the Ukrainian Army.



I didn't say they were defeated, only they have stood up well, lasting longer than the Chechs did in the battle phase before the insurgency phase started. As it is ISIS lacks the means to take territorial control in the Levant at the moment and its main fronts are in Africa, largely forgotten in all the other conflicts brewing there.



The Syrian Arab Republic Military is a far different beast now. Years of combat, Darwinism, good habits rubbed into them by Hezbollah and Iranian training and a complete re-equipping by Russia has resulted in a far better Army. Assad burnt his country down to do so, but ISIS doesn't have the networks of civilian collaborators to operate with like it used to.



So? Iran won, puppetized Iraq under the US's nose, and brazenly looted US equipment supplied to the Iraqi Military in broad daylight.

I don't want to get into this too deeply because we're starting to derail the thread as it is, but I have to say your takes are delusional, and stop at that.

You are playing semantics. They are one and the same. A war only ends when the enemy is pacified and stops resisting.

...

Yeah, no. Completely different beasts. By this criteria Russia has not won a war in it's entire history, arguably the Soviet Union either (bar WWII).


I look at actual results. The US lost Iraq and Afghanistan. Mayhap we need to reassess the US Military's actual ability to win wars in an honest way don't you think?

Now who is playing semantics? Define "loss" and define "victory". Maybe you need to stop with the mental acrobatics that allow you to define the results of any wars Russia prticipates in as "victory", and any war the US participates in as "defeat", even when the actual, factual results are either the same or in reality are flipped on their head. Don't you think?
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
  • HaHa
Reactions: LTR

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
I feel attacked... :(

I'm going to assume that I'm not considered a Donb Ass though. That must be everyone else who engaged in derails. I don't think my fragile ego can take anymore if that isn't the case though. :cry:

:p
DonBass literally means the Basin l/Pool of the Don river, dude.As to the details,well, you did start them quite often.
TBH the discussion of Realpolitik and US foreign(Monroe doctrine, permanent, bloated security state, US intervenrionalism and the reasons behind it) policy merits a thread of its own.
 

Chiron

Well-known member
I don't want to get into this too deeply because we're starting to derail the thread as it is, but I have to say your takes are delusional, and stop at that.



...

Yeah, no. Completely different beasts. By this criteria Russia has not won a war in it's entire history, arguably the Soviet Union either (bar WWII).




Now who is playing semantics? Define "loss" and define "victory". Maybe you need to stop with the mental acrobatics that allow you to define the results of any wars Russia prticipates in as "victory", and any war the US participates in as "defeat", even when the actual, factual results are either the same or in reality are flipped on their head. Don't you think?

"Sigh"

Again, who is the one that won?

You can say XYZ all you want, but at the end of the day, the US lost its post 2000 wars while Putin has won his.

Taliban holds Afghanistan. Iran's Iraqi and Syrian Puppets are still in charge and they have free access to those areas.

US has nothing to show for these conflicts. Putin brought a rebellious province under his control and made it an ally. Putin bitch slapped Georgia and secured two pro-Russian regions from further Georgian interference. He rescued an Ally in Syria. He took Crimea with barely a shot fired and bled Ukraine white and now is dealing it a death blow.

You don't have an argument. The results are the results.

Maybe you should ask yourself how the US lost the war on terror.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
DonBass literally means the Basin l/Pool of the Don river, dude.As to the details,well, you did start them quite often.
TBH the discussion of Realpolitik and US foreign(Monroe doctrine, permanent, bloated security state, US intervenrionalism and the reasons behind it) policy merits a thread of its own.

I know that... but look at how she titled the Thread.... DonbAss. That's an awfully convenient typo. :unsure: :p
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: LTR

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Since the discussion would likely lead to a derail, I'm going to post some amazingly shitty takes that have been taken off of Twitter.

First off, to frame the post, here is Nate Silver explaining cogently what you are all about to see.



Keep the War Going Because It'll Prevent Trump from Getting Elected!



If Putin was Black or Brown the West would be intervening!



What about Covid in Ukraine?



Queer People Making Sure to Never Be Marginalized Again Except for Special Treatment

 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Part Two!

Cenk Uygur echoing why Right Wingers love Putin. It's because he's White and White Supremacy of course!



Second Blue Checkmark... same point as the first



Palestinians Making it All About Themselves



Not sure if real or not... Remember Black Lives Matter First



And to cleanse the palate...

 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Palestinians Making it All About Themselves



Russia = Israel, Donbass + Crimea = Israeli settlers, Ukraine = Palestinians. Good analogy. I thought of it yesterday. With the notable exception that the religion difference is much, much less pronounced in Russia vs. Ukraine than in Israel vs. Palestine.
 

King Arts

Well-known member
Russia = Israel, Donbass + Crimea = Israeli settlers, Ukraine = Palestinians. Good analogy. I thought of it yesterday. With the notable exception that the religion difference is much, much less pronounced in Russia vs. Ukraine than in Israel vs. Palestine.
Is there even a religious difference? Both are Eastern Orthodox Christians mostly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top