Nope. The whole collapse of French and English empires prove you completely wrong about that. Dozens upon dozens of strength worshiping peoples (including the Middle Eastern ones) went back to their own way of life as soon as their occupiers weakened.
Where are all the British and French patriots in Asia and Africa?
And that's despite the occupiers being civilizationally more developed than them, with all the comforts, riches and awe it brings.
Of course even then surviving 123 years of occupation is only a moderately desirable fate.
Its not the worst option, but also not something the world would be jealous of.
You know what would be better?
Never being occupied in the first place.
1945, that explains something. Of course they went back to Germany, they were never completely separate from that.
No, see history. What did very Christian Spain do with its Muslims? What few technically Christian kings remain in Europe are generally no better than democratic governments, and sometimes worse.
I have a bit wider view of history. That's an obviously silly argument because it requires you to completely ignore the importance and power of pagan built Greco-Roman world. Without it, there would be no Christian Europe, and if by some miracle without Rome a religious sect from Palestine somehow spread around Europe anyway, it would not be important without the heritage of those pagans.
For similar reasons as Rome died despite freshly converting to Christianity. Elites too comfortable, self-confident, busy with their little hot but unimportant social games and insufficiently interested in the real but hard to solve problems heading for them.
Last time kicked out of their comfy seats by strength worshipping warlords who set up their warrior-king states that eventually became the golden age of Christian kingdoms.
Christian world obviously didn't begin strong, you can leave out that selective narrative. It grew out of ruins of Rome and building on its heritage.
Then again, Rome itself also didn't start strong.
No civilization did.
No civilization ever did get strong though by not being willing to put own interests above those of their enemies. That is, very obviously, a recipe for disaster. The Christian kingdoms you idolize would not cry over the comforts and rights of Palestinians. They would worry about Mohammedans plotting to control the Holy Land. That's what makes the difference between western civilization now and western civilization in whatever of its golden ages, Christian or Greco-Roman.
About Iranians - they have the same right like Izrael,or both sides have no rights at all.
Now,your post:
1.Nope - tribes who was strong take power after WW2,not those who was conqered - for example,Ashanti do not get their empire back.And colonials do not prosecuted local cultures.When Poland survived after 123 years of being persecuted for taking polish on polish land.
2.Prussians were one of german nations.Bavarians are still there,prussians are not.Why? they worshipped strenght,when strenght vanished they vanished,too.
Strong nation is that which survive occupation,not that which occupy others.
3.Spain gave them 6 months for sell their goods and go back to Africa.You mistaken being Christian with being stupid - and letting invaders remain would be stupidity.And muslims were invaders there.Jews were removed,becouse they were 5th column,not becouse religion.
Kings now are just puppets,so it is not important.Somebody is making decisions for them.
4.Church made our cyvilisation from Greek/Aristotle/ philosophy,roman law and christian morality,when both greek and roman cyvilisations were dead.Our cyvilisation is still alive,their - not.
Of course,if we die Church would not die with us,it would mix our morality with other cyvilisations,it worked for Africa,Vietnam,China and Japan once.
5.And Europe start ruling world only after those warlords becomed christians.And start using christian standarts,for example not enslaving enemies.
6.Those christian kingdoms would retake Holy Land from all pagans,including jews.And you do not undarstand what Chrystianity mean.It is not surrender to enemies,it is fight and win - but in the name of Jesus,and do not enslaving enemies after victory or stealing what was theirs.Only killing those who deserwed it and retaking our property.
How do you think we win Lepanto and Vienna? yes,popes prayed,but soldiers fought.And win.
It is better even if God do not exist - becouse strenght worshippers would cease to exist after series of defeat,we do not.
And Science is possible only when you agree that Truth exist - if you worshipp strenght,in long turn your science would cease to exist.Just like leftist science now.
Of course,you could not enslave others or steal what is theirs - but...it is really so hard ?