Warbirds Thread

Tupolov Tu-142M Sea Bear

E5Mq7kDUcAQaxgC
 
It's a counter rotating propellers create unique sound that can be annoying over long distances, Soviets had to develop special pitch canceling headphones for air and ground crew, so aircraft could be operated effectively. Ground crew not wearing these headphones were known to end up vomiting when Tu-95 started up the engine and US submarines are known to have been able to (partially) track them on their passive sonar.
 
It's a counter rotating propellers create unique sound that can be annoying over long distances, Soviets had to develop special pitch canceling headphones for air and ground crew, so aircraft could be operated effectively. Ground crew not wearing these headphones were known to end up vomiting when Tu-95 started up the engine and US submarines are known to have been able to (partially) track them on their passive sonar.
Oh that was why that one US plane was never adopted.
 
It's a counter rotating propellers create unique sound that can be annoying over long distances, Soviets had to develop special pitch canceling headphones for air and ground crew, so aircraft could be operated effectively. Ground crew not wearing these headphones were known to end up vomiting when Tu-95 started up the engine and US submarines are known to have been able to (partially) track them on their passive sonar.
The Hunt for Red October references how noisy they are. I think the line goes "Captain! We've just been overflown by a low altitude multi-engine turboprop."

The Red October was maneuvering through underwater canyons South of Iceland at the time. The course was intended to result in passive sonar detecting only nonsensical gibberish.

EDIT: The Soviet crew knows it's a Tu-142.
 
It's a counter rotating propellers create unique sound that can be annoying over long distances, Soviets had to develop special pitch canceling headphones for air and ground crew, so aircraft could be operated effectively. Ground crew not wearing these headphones were known to end up vomiting when Tu-95 started up the engine and US submarines are known to have been able to (partially) track them on their passive sonar.
The propeller blade tips are going round at a speed higher than the speed of the sound, that's why the propellers are so noisy.
 
I do appreciate a contra prop, nice blend of elegant and complicated.

seafire-47-735x413.jpg



Probably because of the ridiculously OP plane from this fictional setting





Speaking of which, what is the best air combat movie in your opinion?

Battle of Britain, Memphis Belle, Iron Eagle, that sort of thing :)
 
Memphis Belle was like one of the first movie's I ever saw, so I'm naturally biased towards it.
 
I do appreciate a contra prop, nice blend of elegant and complicated.

seafire-47-735x413.jpg



Probably because of the ridiculously OP plane from this fictional setting





Speaking of which, what is the best air combat movie in your opinion?

Battle of Britain, Memphis Belle, Iron Eagle, that sort of thing :)

I will have to rewatch Memphis Belle.
Been awhile. Also, video unavailable in the US.

BTW, here is the plane that broke unofficially broke the fastest propeller aircraft.
Republic_XF-84H_in_flight.jpg

XF-84H Thunderscreech
 
Two Russian Su-30SM Fighters intercepting and escorting a US P8 Poseidon over the Black Sea.



Also some Russian comic illustrating something similar! Pincers Out!
 
Egyptian Su-35's.... blindfolded. No one they kept losing the air war to Israel.

E7urMvKWYAoKBjG
 






(Note: these are some of the few without some glaring music in the background, other one using Where Eagles Dare theme in the background while also showing other helicopter designs)

The Fl-282 'Hummingbird' intermeshing rotor helicopter. The world's first serial production helicopter. From what I understood, it is also one of the easiest to fly. As in 'a grandmother with some basic sub-100 hour training can do it' easy.

The US had its own designs but they were fraught with mechanical and reliability issues... at least until they managed to nick a few surviving Fl-282 and had one of the designers help them out, which eventually led to the HH-43 Husky:



It also has a grandson in the K-MAX. ;)


It must be noted that using intermeshing rotors is more efficient than pretty much every other design I've seen, at least from what I've gleaned. Then again, the K-MAX can literally haul itself in external cargo weight.
 
So here's a good question when do you think the last B-52 will fly? And the last DC-3 and its variants. And of course the C-130.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top