Your Political Beliefs

7 Gold Eye Heals the Wise

The First Weeaboo
Founder
A thread to discuss your personal political beliefs.

That is to say, one where in you talk with others about what sort of political views you have.

I'll go first.

Individual Liberty:
Each person is born with freedom from arbitrary or unjustified restraint. The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.

Private Property:
Individuals have the right to obtain and control possessions, as well as the fruits of their own labor.

Federalism:
A system of dual sovereignty, in which the people delegate certain powers to the national government, while the states, municipal governments, and the people retain all other powers.

Limited Government:
The national government has only those powers granted to it in the Constitution. If a power is not listed, the national government is assumed not to have it. Strong local self-government is the keystone to preserving human freedom. "The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to perform best."

Written Constitution:
If government is a social contract, and it has only limited power formally delegated by the people, then the contract—Constitution—must be in writing. The strongest proponent of a written constitution was Thomas Paine, who said, “An unwritten constitution is not a constitution at all.”.

The Constitution should protect the people from the frailties of their rulers.

"If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself."

Representative Government:
A republican system in which the people elect representatives to represent their interests as they make and carry out laws.

Rights come from God, not government:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law. Natural law is God's law. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion."

“All Men Are Created Equal”:
There is no natural class of rulers amongst men, and every man is born with the same unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Separation of Powers/Checks and Balances:
The Constitution establishes a system of distinct powers to prevent an accumulation of power in one branch of government and to ensure that each branch can stop the others from growing too powerful.

Memes:
THE D.N.A. OF THE SOUL!

Guns:
Never enough.

Lewds:
See "Guns".

Waifu:
See "Guns".
 
Last edited:
Was Libertarian for a long time, leaning distributist now. Not too happy with megacorps at the moment and how easily they can override freedoms by simply pulling the money and services out from under the rug of people designated as undesirables, how elections get manipulated, how with enough money you can just circumvent law or buy up media to shill for you. Other than that very in line with the above.
 
I consider myself the 21st Century equivalent to the Nationalist-wing of the Whigs of the 1830s-1850s. Another term might be the Nationalist Republicans, since that's sometimes applied to the pre-Whig era from what I've seen.

Individual liberty must be defended. A government of checks and balances maintained, so as to balance the powers, and some of my objections to modern American government is the "Imperial Presidency" that the World Wars and Cold War helped to create and cement. Congress has abdicated too much responsibility to the Presidency, and we see that reflected in modern elections where the fight for the White House consumes so much political energy.

As a Whig, I believe that government can and sometimes should get involved in improving the country and its economy, primarily by investing in infrastructure improvements, but also in fields of importance to the Nation. Local and state government (or their equivalent in other structures, like provinces) should be a participant of course (after all, New York State built the Erie Canal). This includes healthcare. I'll note.

All Human beings, regardless of color or creed or gender or sexual orientation or any other distinction one may believe does not fall under these four, possess inherent rights in the political, religious, and social spheres of life. They are provided by the Creator and can be summed up as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Any action that degrades these rights by denying them political and social existence is inherently tyrannical, whether it is done by a government or a private organization or even a person. The only limitations should concern taking away the rights of others. And even the commission of crimes should not inherently eliminate these rights, merely lead to, if necessary, a suspension of some (such as ownership of weapons) until the criminal can be shown as reformed.

Slavers commit the ultimate crime by their actions, as all other crimes against the dignity of Humanity - murder, rape, torture, robbery, to name a few - are inherent to the condition of slavery. They are hostis humani generis - enemies of all Humanity - and their proper fate is the gallows, although mercy for the repentant, or as part of a grander design to end their practices, are not ruled out - see the fact that I would not call for the execution of every slaveowner in the Confederacy as any part of victory.

That's what I can think of for now, but it's some of the most important I think.
 
Last edited:
Religion: Uncaring
Abortion: In favor of at will first trimester Abortion, only for medical reasons after that.
LGBT: I'm bi and support same sex marriage to the same extent that I support heterosexual marriage (I don't think it should be a state institution at all). I don't support LGBT (and especially Trans) exceptionalism however.
Economics: Strongly pro free market capitalism.
Individual Liberty: Very strong supporter.
Drugs: Am in favor of full legalization of all drugs. Also think that any drug use is idiotic.

General philosophy of the government: The core purpose of the government is to protect its citizens from foreign powers, to protect its citizens from one another, and to enforce contracts. The government does not exist to be your parent or protect you from the consequences of your own choices.
 
@Big Steve what is your opinion on the necessity of a written Constitution? Yeah, or Nah?

All in all, I thank you for your detailed reply.

New York State built the Erie Canal
Damn Irish, and their Socialism.
All Human beings, regardless of color or creed or gender or sexual orientation or any other distinction one may believe does not fall under these four, possess inherent rights in the political, religious, and social spheres of life.
#AllMen #NotAllPeople

Atheist, pro-choice, pro-LGBT, support capitalism with some government oversight.
Do you have any more specific opinions ln the structure & responsibilities that government should have?

pro-choice
This is why Blood Libel is a thing.




As a note: I am intending for this thread to be more about explaining our positions than for debating them. Just in case it needed clarification.
 
As a note: I am intending for this thread to be more about explaining our positions than for debating them. Just in case it needed clarification.

I won’t post much as the manager but I will then clarify my beliefs: A Republican by Oath and Honour, a Monarchist by Conviction and Spirit. I will make them known in more detail later. Thank you for doing this, it’s useful to have to clarify all of these beliefs.
 
General philosophy of the government: The core purpose of the government is to protect its citizens from foreign powers, to protect its citizens from one another, and to enforce contracts. The government does not exist to be your parent or protect you from the consequences of your own choices.
I would agree but at the same time theres a lot of negative externalities that need address like the modern impact to your finances on raising a family and it needs to be reincentivized economically as well as the towns that have been negatively affected by regulations on industry and shifts in the market.
 
As a note: I am intending for this thread to be more about explaining our positions than for debating them. Just in case it needed clarification.

Well, this isn't debating so much as commenting on your comments, then. :p

what is your opinion on the necessity of a written Constitution? Yeah, or Nah?

Do you have any more specific opinions ln the structure & responsibilities that government should have?

I'm putting these together because the answer ties both. I personally find a written constitution to be preferable, but if it is the tradition of a specific nation (I'm thinking England/Britain here) to have an unwritten constitution formed entirely from previously-written and held law, I would not gainsay their right to maintain that system. There is perhaps more flexibility in it, which can be a good or bad thing. For the same reason, while I am a republican by sentiment, I do not object to nations that decide to retain their monarchs as living incarnations of their nations and histories. I would no more demand that the British dissolve the monarchy than I would consider summarily dissolving the Constitution of the United States. Which I think also answers the second question, but to make sure of it: nations should decide the structure and responsiblities of government they desire, so long as they are consistent with the principles I laid out in my original post. Obviously there are advantages and disadvantages to, say, the upper house being appointed by regional legislatures versus democratic election, or if the upper house is organized to represent regions equally or with democratic apportionment by population. These things can easily be good in one era but bad in another, and then flip again, so I favor letting nations decide stuff according to their legal and parliamentary traditions.


All in all, I thank you for your detailed reply.

You're welcome.

Damn Irish, and their Socialism.

This was the 1820s, well before the major Irish immigration waves. :p I mean, there may have been some Scotch-Irish (Ulstermen), but they were mostly further south of NY as I recall.

#AllMen #NotAllPeople

I'm not sure of what you mean by this?
 
I'm some sort of Libertarian Conservative hybrid, I'd suppose. It's hard to say, given the dearth of information and political theory out there. Sometimes I wonder if I'm too agreeable, as I tend to nod along to whatever is being told to me...
 
Was Libertarian for a long time, leaning distributist now. Not too happy with megacorps at the moment and how easily they can override freedoms by simply pulling the money and services out from under the rug of people designated as undesirables, how elections get manipulated, how with enough money you can just circumvent law or buy up media to shill for you. Other than that very in line with the above.

Been all over the place, but I am leaning distributist now too.

But over all I am moderate conservative of sorts, an actual moderate conservative and not a scraper.
 
What is distributivism? I could google it... but hearing you monkeys explain a new concept to me sounds far more appealing and like farmingly...
Distributism is basically socialism and capitalism both bad and both have negative effects on tradition, the family, the local community and the church. These are seen as most important to social function and cohesion. Economics should generally be oriented to as many small businesses and self employment as possible, less giant corporations, and local communities should have more power and autonomy. Basically, people are better off oriented towards their local community than towards a class identity of rich vs poor, and that its more fulfilling and a better life to be self employed or in a small business than as one cog in a giant corporation. People care more about you when your boss sees you every day than as a number in a log. I say leaning because I see it as an ideal more so than a prescription and policy shouldnt be aimed at forcing these things but to make sure that they stick around, are supported and favored over megacorps, and I am definitely more capitalistic leaning than socialist leaning and dont think both are close to equally bad.
 
Politically I'm Conservative though I have a big Libertarian streak in me. I believe people should have the right to live their lives as they see fit with minimum interference from the Government. You born a male and want to live as a girl? Knock yourself out. You believe in the Bible, Tora or Koran or any other religion out there and want to live by their tenants? Live your life? Dooo eeeet. Pursue your happiness.

But I draw the line when your pursuit of happiness hurts other people. This is incredibly nuanced though and complex to go into.

As an American, I believe in the Constitution of United States. I hold that document sacrosanct. And I believe in the bill of rights.

Economically I'm a Capitalist. Capitalism has done more to bring people out of Poverty than Socialism and Communism have done to put people in it. I'm against Crony-Capitalism and believe the Free market should decide a corporations fate and not government. However, I realize that Corporations unchecked bring their own set of problems that must be checked. How we do that is an ever evolving question.

I believe in cleaning up our environment. Some Government policies have proven useful to that effect, others are naked grabs for power by Socialist organizations. See the Green New Deal for details on that. But I believe it will be the Private sector and advanced technology that will give us solutions to our growing problems. Energy? Nuclear is the way to go. Solar and Wind just aren't there yet but the technology is progressing. I'm definitely a fan of the renewables once they're able to produce on the level needed. But right now our best bet is Natural Gas.

That's a rather simplified version of my views.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top