China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

[Iconoclast]

No, you typically use something like CRISPR for that, which is rather different.

They’ve been doing recombinant insulin and other, similar biologics since before the laboratory CRISPR-Cas9 process existed. Like, the 70s/80s.

How did they make insulin from recombinant DNA?

The History of a Wonderful Thing We Call Insulin | American Diabetes Association

Discover the fascinating history of insulin, from its invention by Dr. Frederick Banting in 1921 to its role in transforming diabetes treatment today.

diabetes.org

If you're allergic, which affected an extremely small number of people, not the claimed 70%.

Yes, if you’re allergic. But knowing that some people have peanut allergies, would you inject billions of people with peanut butter?

This is your citation for this, yes?

Not actually written by real doctors. "María José Martínez-Albarracín" is not a doctor and has never been a doctor. She claims to be, but she isn't one. She's a member of the fraudulent org "Doctors for Truth" that, among other things, claims the corona virus didn't actually exist. The only one I can find any actual credentials for is... a Urologist, Alejandro Sousa. Not exactly an expert on nanoparticle chemistry.

LNPs are not specific to deltoid muscle tissue. They readily cross the BBB. This is a known attribute of the delivery mechanism. If you don’t believe me, then look up LNP as a delivery mechanism for Alzheimer’s drugs. Again, capillaries can drain the injection into the bloodstream, and it can cross the BBB and end up producing Spike in the brain.

MESSENGER, not MOD.

Wrong. They’re two different things: mRNA is the natural, unmodified form, and modRNA is an acronym for “nucleoside-modified messenger RNA”. The vaccine mRNA is actually not mRNA at all, but modRNA. In modRNA, all of the uridine has been replaced by the synthetic uridine analog pseudouridine. All the Us have been replaced by Ψs. Instead of GAUC it’s GAΨC. This allows the molecule to evade detection by pattern recognition receptors that would otherwise trigger huge inflammation. It also keeps it from being readily degraded by ribonucleases. The body’s digestive enzymes see the Ψ and they have absolutely no idea what to do with it.

"imagine if"

Yeah. We have evidence of TLR suppression after COVID vaccination.

Are Covid Vaccines Engineered to Disable Our Immune Systems? | The Liberty Beacon

ER Editor: Dr. Mike Williams does a sterling job of explaining the probable mechanism behind the mRNA vaccines and why they have been engineered to TURN OFF a key element in our immune system response [...]

www.thelibertybeacon.com

... Ok, one, if the endotoxins were there you're fucked anyway. Two, if the spike binds the endotoxins, that would be a good thing because then the endotoxin is bound with the spike. Like, it would fuck up any cell it then attaches to, but you're not any worse off than you were before.

Not necessarily. See the following:

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a bacterial lipopolysaccharide delivery system in an overzealous inflammatory cascade - PubMed

Accumulating evidence indicates a potential role for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the overactivation of the immune response during SARS-CoV-2 infection. LPS is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4, mediating proinflammatory effects. We previously reported that LPS directly interacts with...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

It is most certainly not prionogenic as it doesn't interact with and fold proteins into either more of itself or into a misfolded prion. The paper you linked to show this doesn't even say it does that, it claims that it can bind to other proteins and cause accumulation of those proteins; which is a very different thing.

Yeah, about that. I’ve got some bad news.

PROOF: COVID vaccines cause prion diseases

Twitter suspended my account (likely forever since there is no appeal) due to one post on prion diseases. Here's the information they wanted to make sure you NEVER find out.

kirschsubstack.com

https://scholarlycommons.hcahealthcare.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420&context=internal-medicine

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363484655_Towards_the_emergence_of_a_new_form_of_the_neurodegenerative_Creutzfeldt-Jakob_disease_Twenty_six_cases_of_CJD_declared_a_few_days_after_a_COVID-19_vaccine_Jab

That was specifically found with repeated vaccinations, which is very much a "no shit" type of finding to anyone with a brain.

Yeah. And the authorities are recommending repeat vaccinations. Which will inevitably trigger immune tolerance to Spike.

IgG4 Antibody Class Switch: End Of The Line

Tired of COVID? So is your immune system: innate, adaptive and complement are all out to lunch, and you're on your own.

veryvirology.substack.com

They used SV40 as a base from which to build the vaccine from, SV40 is hazardous but the SV40 promoter sequence by itself is not.

Not true. If the SV40 promoter integrates into the genome next to an oncogene, it could promote that, and the cell could turn cancerous.

SV40 Virus Linked to Multiple Cancers Found in mRNA Vaccines, Microbiologist Says

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan, a former researcher for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Human Genome Project, said he discovered simian virus 40 (SV40), a virus found in monkey and humans, in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. SV40 has been linked to cancer in humans, including mesotheliomas...

childrenshealthdefense.org

When he says "no one is talking about this problem" and he leaves out "oh yes people are talking about this problem" yes, yes he does in fact need to put more. Or at least be more precise in his statements.

You don't do any synthesis of new knowledge whatsoever. You aren't able to look at a paper about LNPs delivering Alzheimer's drugs to the brain, and then look at another paper about COVID-19 vaccines being enclosed in LNPs, and then draw the conclusion that LNPs carrying COVID-19 vaccine modRNA can potentially migrate to the brain. You want peer-reviewed papers that explicitly spell out everything and do all the actual legwork for you.

What is Social Skepticism?

Social skepticism is kabuki, the activist-minded abuse of science by means of its underlying philosophical vulnerability, skepticism. An imperious agency which has politicized and enslaved science through teaching weaponized fake skepticism to useful idiots. The social skeptic is a 'science...

theethicalskeptic.com

 

[mrttao]

They’ve been doing recombinant insulin and other, similar biologics since before CRISPR existed. Like, the 70s/80s.

Small correction. before CRISPR was discovered.

CRISPR is a naturally occuring gene editting toolkit developed and used by bacteria

Spoiler

It is a set of genes in bacteria, that originate from viruses that tried to infect that bacteria, and are used to defend against viruses trying to infect that bacteria

Humans merely discovered it in nature, and started using it.

 

[Iconoclast]

Small correction. before CRISPR was discovered.
CRISPR is a naturally occuring gene editting toolkit developed and used by bacteria

Humans merely discovered it in nature, and started using it.

I know that. I meant the actual lab process of using it to snip and splice nucleic acids. I reworded it a split-second after posting.

 

[Vyor]

Yeah, about that. I’ve got some bad news.

PROOF: COVID vaccines cause prion diseases

Twitter suspended my account (likely forever since there is no appeal) due to one post on prion diseases. Here's the information they wanted to make sure you NEVER find out.

kirschsubstack.com

This is the dumbest shit I've ever seen LMAO.

That isn't what those fucking numbers mean. More people were vaccinated with the covid shit than any other vaccine that year, or period really. It was the largest theft of money and time in that entire 2-3 year period. Obviously everything would be found in time with it. If you gave a drug to all 8 billion people on earth and found a few hundred thousand dementia cases formed in the year after deploying the drug... that isn't the drug doing it, that's a few hundred thousand people that would have gotten dementia anyway because as it turns out 8 billion people is a lot of people and low occurrence diseases are still common enough for that.

1 in 10, or 10%, of the population above 65 have dementia. The amount of dementia cases reported in VAERs is expected. VAERs doesn't give a rate of occurrence, it gives an flat number for reported cases.

This shit is nonsense.

They’ve been doing recombinant insulin and other, similar biologics since before the laboratory CRISPR-Cas9 process existed. Like, the 70s/80s.

I thought the method for that used a structure similar to crispr, but I was mistaken.

 

[Iconoclast]

This is the dumbest shit I've ever seen LMAO.

That isn't what those fucking numbers mean. More people were vaccinated with the covid shit than any other vaccine that year, or period really. It was the largest theft of money and time in that entire 2-3 year period. Obviously everything would be found in time with it. If you gave a drug to all 8 billion people on earth and found a few hundred thousand dementia cases formed in the year after deploying the drug... that isn't the drug doing it, that's a few hundred thousand people that would have gotten dementia anyway because as it turns out 8 billion people is a lot of people and low occurrence diseases are still common enough for that.

1 in 10, or 10%, of the population above 65 have dementia. The amount of dementia cases reported in VAERs is expected. VAERs doesn't give a rate of occurrence, it gives an flat number for reported cases.

This shit is nonsense.

Unfortunately, no. It's not nonsense.

 

[Vyor]

Unfortunately, no. It's not nonsense.

... 26 is not a big enough sample size.

 

[Iconoclast]

... 26 is not a big enough sample size.

It is something to keep an eye on. Prion diseases have a very long incubation time. Émilie Jaumain at INRAE pricked her thumb with prion-contaminated forceps in 2010. She didn't develop symtompatic CJD until 2017, and she passed away two years after that. That's a nearly decade-long span from exposure to death. What this means is that if the vaccines cause CJD, there's no way to know the true incidence rate because the span of time from the vaccine rollouts until now isn't long enough to capture it, except for those outliers with short incubation periods.

Huh. Interesting. Agenda 2030.

2030 would be about nine years after the vaccine rollouts.

And FEMA have stockpiled massive supplies of plastic grave liners, which are exactly what you'd need if you didn't want millions of prion-diseased corpses to contaminate the groundwater.

They really thought of everything, didn't they?

 

[Vyor]

It is something to keep an eye on. Prion diseases have a very long incubation time. Émilie Jaumain at INRAE pricked her thumb with prion-contaminated forceps in 2010. She didn't develop symtompatic CJD until 2017, and she passed away two years after that. That's a nearly decade-long span from exposure to death. What this means is that if the vaccines cause CJD, there's no way to know the true incidence rate because the span of time from the vaccine rollouts until now isn't long enough to capture it, except for those outliers with short incubation periods.

It also means that it wouldn't be visible after just a few months meaning that the reported incidents are almost certain to be coincidences.

 

[Iconoclast]

It also means that it wouldn't be visible after just a few months meaning that the reported incidents are almost certain to be coincidences.

That's only true if all cases invariably have a long incubation period and not just the majority of cases. You are not taking into account the possibility that a minority of cases may be rapid-onset.

 

[Vyor]

That's only true if all cases invariably have a long incubation period and not just the majority of cases. You are not taking into account the possibility that a minority of cases may be rapid-onset.

And you're not taking into account that people could be making mountains out of molehills for money.

 

[Iconoclast]

And you're not taking into account that people could be making mountains out of molehills for money.

What money? People who’ve called out the vaccines have been shunned by the establishment, stripped of credentials, and lost six-figure careers. People are investigating and documenting COVID-19 vaccine harms at great personal cost. It’s the exact opposite of money. People were ostracized for saying this.

 

[Vyor]

What money? People who’ve called out the vaccines have been shunned by the establishment, stripped of credentials, and lost six-figure careers. People are investigating and documenting COVID-19 vaccine harms at great personal cost. It’s the exact opposite of money. People were ostracized for saying this.

Ah, but they can sell themselves to people like "Doctors for Truth" and get paid for speaking deals.

 

[Scottty]

Something that might be relevant...

 

[DarthOne]

Something that might be relevant...

2025, (probably) going to start in Brazil, going to mess up people's brains and hit children unless the new Vax gets taken...got it.

 

[Scottty]

2025, (probably) going to start in Brazil, going to mess up people's brains and hit children unless the new Vax gets taken...got it.

And if the new vaxx itself does all the things they warned you the new virus would do... that shows it's working!

 

[DarthOne]

And if the new vaxx itself does all the things they warned you the new virus would do... that shows it's working!

(Laughs in gas mask)

 

[Iconoclast]

Pfizer concealed deaths in their clinical trials.

How Pfizer Hid Nearly 80% of COVID Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators

According to an analysis, published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.

childrenshealthdefense.org

Forensic analysis of the 38 subject deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

ijvtpr.com

 

[Vyor]

Pfizer concealed deaths in their clinical trials.

How Pfizer Hid Nearly 80% of COVID Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators

According to an analysis, published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.

childrenshealthdefense.org

Forensic analysis of the 38 subject deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

ijvtpr.com

But, perhaps unexpectedly, after 33 weeks the data revealed no significant difference between deaths in the vaccinated and placebo groups for the initial 20-week placebo-controlled portion of the trial.

After week 20, after most former placebo subjects had received the vaccine, deaths among those in the vaccine group continued unabated.

The authors revealed "inconsistencies" between data presented in Pfizer-BioNTech's 6-month interim report and subsequent publications by Pfizer-BioNTech trial site administrators:

So after 4.5 months, there was no difference in deaths here, right?

"Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in the number of deaths due to cardiac events in the BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals compared to those who received only the placebo."

So which is it? Which of these two statements are accurate?

 

[mrttao]

So after 4.5 months, there was no difference in deaths here, right?

So which is it? Which of these two statements are accurate?

Facepalm.

The data pfitzer gave the FDA to get emergency authorization showed no increase in death. Because that data was falsified.
The actual data is that they had a 3.7x increase in deaths which they hid by falsifying the data

basic reading comprehension.

 

[Vyor]

Facepalm.

The data pfitzer gave the FDA to get emergency authorization showed no increase in death. Because that data was falsified.
The actual data is that they had a 3.7x increase in deaths which they hid by falsifying the data

basic reading comprehension.

What the analysis shows

Corinne Michels, Ph.D., retired distinguished professor of biology at Queens College, New York, led the DailyClout Pfizer/BioNTech Documents Investigations Team on what the authors claim was the first independent examination of original data from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) clinical trial.

Investigators looked at each of the 38 deaths occurring between July 27, 2020, the start of phase 2/3 of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trial, and March 13, 2021, the end date culminating in Pfizer-BioNTech's 6-month interim report.

Or perhaps you need to actually read the article?

38 deaths total out of 44 thousand participants. A 0.075% death rate.