China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

Think about it.
There are people - or at least human-shaped things - walking around out there that think themselves oh-so-clever, so much smarter than others...
...but who seem to be unable to understand that rather basic point: don't give a weapon to someone who might decide to use it on you!
Except they do understand; that's why they're so desperate to take the weapons away from the the general public, the plebs. These people are globalists; they see the ruling class everywhere as being united against the people they rule, whom they more than anything else fear rising up against them. They don't fear giving China weapons because they assume they'll be used solely against the lower classes; whom they intend to genocide anyways, in accordance with their belief in overpopulation pseudo-science.
 
Except they do understand; that's why they're so desperate to take the weapons away from the the general public, the plebs. These people are globalists; they see the ruling class everywhere as being united against the people they rule, whom they more than anything else fear rising up against them. They don't fear giving China weapons because they assume they'll be used solely against the lower classes; whom they intend to genocide anyways, in accordance with their belief in overpopulation pseudo-science.

Anyone who really thinks the "ruling class" are all one big happy family, united worldwide against the commoners is ignorant to an extreme degree about world history.
 
Anyone who really thinks the "ruling class" are all one big happy family, united worldwide against the commoners is ignorant to an extreme degree about world history.
The ruling class are, at present, one big happy family united worldwide against the commoners. It would do you no good to read history to confirm or disconfirm this because what is happening right now has no historical precedent.
 
The ruling class are, at present, one big happy family united worldwide against the commoners. It would do you no good to read history to confirm or disconfirm this because what is happening right now has no historical precedent.

Look, if you're claiming the situation to be, as you admit, an utterly unprecedented one, then the burden of proof is very much on you.

If the Western globalists really think they're "one big happy family" with the Chinese Communist Party, the more fool they, and the Chicoms would be laughing up their sleeves at them. Commies aren't even loyal to each other.
 
Look, if you're claiming the situation to be, as you admit, an utterly unprecedented one, then the burden of proof is very much on you.

If the Western globalists really think they're "one big happy family" with the Chinese Communist Party, the more fool they, and the Chicoms would be laughing up their sleeves at them. Commies aren't even loyal to each other.
They arent one big happy family, but you're also looking at countries and borders in the old sense. There is a globalist order that transcends borders that has a lot of power and influence. The public facing portion of that is called the WEF, but its deeper than that.

Most countries have freedom to do what they want, as long as it fits into the global order. So it looks like they have a lot of freedom, but deep state actors and intelligence agencies have their hands on everything.

But they arent an ultimate power, and not all countries are on board, and people like Trump get elected and fuck up their plans.

But the world government? That's here.
 
The ruling class are, at present, one big happy family united worldwide against the commoners. It would do you no good to read history to confirm or disconfirm this because what is happening right now has no historical precedent.
No, this really, really is not anything particularly new.

The European aristocracy had a similar semi-ingroup attitude regarding themselves vs the various commoners. In some ways they identified more with nobles of other nations over the commoners of their own nations, especially in the 1800's as the noveau rich of the captains of industry started to displace them.

They still ended up marching to war against each other in WWI. They got a lot of the commoners killed, but they also absolutely were thrown out of power. Only the British aristocracy lasted after that, and they were waning in power and influence. Some, like the Russian aristocracy, were hunted towards extermination.

The rich and powerful, those who strive to be such, and those who tickle the fancy of such, grouping up across national boundaries and mid-cultural barriers is nothing new. Sure, some of the particulars are different in this modern age, but the comparisons are recognizable to what was happening 120 years ago.

The European meta-culture and the Anglosphere have this issue. Other meta-cultural groups and nations are not part of the same elite block, aside from some bleeding around the edges.
 
No, this really, really is not anything particularly new.

The European aristocracy had a similar semi-ingroup attitude regarding themselves vs the various commoners. In some ways they identified more with nobles of other nations over the commoners of their own nations, especially in the 1800's as the noveau rich of the captains of industry started to displace them.

They still ended up marching to war against each other in WWI. They got a lot of the commoners killed, but they also absolutely were thrown out of power. Only the British aristocracy lasted after that, and they were waning in power and influence. Some, like the Russian aristocracy, were hunted towards extermination.

The rich and powerful, those who strive to be such, and those who tickle the fancy of such, grouping up across national boundaries and mid-cultural barriers is nothing new. Sure, some of the particulars are different in this modern age, but the comparisons are recognizable to what was happening 120 years ago.

The European meta-culture and the Anglosphere have this issue. Other meta-cultural groups and nations are not part of the same elite block, aside from some bleeding around the edges.
Well, a big part of it is that European nobility was intermarrying aggressively for hundreds of years. Of course you're going to identify more with a relative, even a distant relative, than a complete stranger.

Add in the similarities in upbringings and interests, as well as the frequent travel and communication, and the emergence of a unified tribal culture was almost inevitable.

If we consider how many modern 'power couples' (interesting phrase) pair up at elite universities and post-graduate programs, the emergence of a similar phenomena is no surprise.
 
Well, a big part of it is that European nobility was intermarrying aggressively for hundreds of years. Of course you're going to identify more with a relative, even a distant relative, than a complete stranger.
It was even more extreme than than.

Everyone heard of Queen Cleopatra. What most people do not know is that Cleopatra's 1 through 6 only spoke greek and did not even speak egyptian.
While Cleopatra the 7th was a weirdo who learned egyptian as a second language. Because she believes the royal family should actually understand the language of the commoners.

There are various cases in europe too, where the kings and queens literally did not speak the language of the country they were ruling.

It was basically a single clan that ruled all of europe.

And yes, they did have some internal conflicts. comes with being a bunch of kings with armies of peasants.
But they were far more hostile towards the commoners than they were towards each other.
 
It was even more extreme than than.

Everyone heard of Queen Cleopatra. What most people do not know is that Cleopatra's 1 through 6 only spoke greek and did not even speak egyptian.
While Cleopatra the 7th was a weirdo who learned egyptian as a second language. Because she believes the royal family should actually understand the language of the commoners.

There are various cases in europe too, where the kings and queens literally did not speak the language of the country they were ruling.

It was basically a single clan that ruled all of europe.

And yes, they did have some internal conflicts. comes with being a bunch of kings with armies of peasants.
But they were far more hostile towards the commoners than they were towards each other.
Agree.Napoleon would win ,even with all mistakes he did,if european Kings do not wanted him deposed.
 
Look, if you're claiming the situation to be, as you admit, an utterly unprecedented one, then the burden of proof is very much on you.

If the Western globalists really think they're "one big happy family" with the Chinese Communist Party, the more fool they, and the Chicoms would be laughing up their sleeves at them. Commies aren't even loyal to each other.
This is what the ruling class are doing:

 
Those dipshits over on FiC still haven't got the memo, have they? When even the former director of the CDC is admitting that these pharmaceutical giants are putting out a contaminated product with no quality control, that's a sign. It's a sign that you've been living under a rock and it still hasn't fucking sunk in yet. Anthony Fauci is an unindicted felon who should be put UNDER the goddamn jail.



 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top