You're still a homo
United States Why are "squatter's rights" a thing?
- Thread starter Captain X
- Start date
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
There is difference between being a Homo and being a homo.
Yeah this about sums up the maturity level of My sense of humor lol
Better to have an immature sense of humor, than no humor at all!
Wargamer08
Well-known member
Back to squatters.
One month and what's yours is their's. What do you think the odds are that the murdered women paid her property tax? What do you think the odds are of the squatters doing so?
As far as I'm concerned squatters rights are just another step down the road to full anarco-tyranny.
One month and what's yours is their's. What do you think the odds are that the murdered women paid her property tax? What do you think the odds are of the squatters doing so?
As far as I'm concerned squatters rights are just another step down the road to full anarco-tyranny.
I predicted this kind of admission, which is why I made my comment the way I did. As you recall, Natives were called "savages" by the same people who did this to them, yet now it's defended by trying to play the "whatabout" game.
Incidentally, I severely doubt anyone making the "might makes right" argument are looking at the current situation as far as the Leftists and Globalists taking over everything and just shrugging and saying: "That's how it's worked for all of human history."
Oh, so since the commies are taking over, they're the legitimate government with the monopoly on violence?
49ersfootball
Well-known member
That escalated quickly!
49ersfootball
Well-known member
Heard about this sad news story earlier this morning on Fox News.
KilroywasNOTHere
"BEEP!"
I predicted this kind of admission, which is why I made my comment the way I did. As you recall, Natives were called "savages" by the same people who did this to them, yet now it's defended by trying to play the "whatabout" game.
Incidentally, I severely doubt anyone making the "might makes right" argument are looking at the current situation as far as the Leftists and Globalists taking over everything and just shrugging and saying: "That's how it's worked for all of human history."
Oh, so since the commies are taking over, they're the legitimate government with the monopoly on violence?
This, and let's not forget that a lot of the problems America has going on right now. Come from tactics OUR government used on a lot of these other nations during the cold war. Example: the Fentanyl epidemic.
bintananth
behind a desk
Don't pretend that any power-that-is won't abuse their power to supress those who oppose and/or disagree with them.
My great-great-great grandparents left Japan in the 1850s because "being Catholic" was illegal.
Poe
Well-known member
If they win, then yes they unfortunately are. Why are you arguing with me about this anyway? What would the alternative be? This entire train of thought is leftist in nature to begin with, so if you hate them so much why are you making their arguments for them?
KilroywasNOTHere
"BEEP!"
Then by that definition the Right has been making the lefts argument for the past five to ten years now. Heck some of the right wing arguments of today WERE the left wing arguments of 5, years ago.
Suddenly cultural appropriation, racial miscasting in media, and historical inaccuracies In fiction being racist are all right wing issues now and something for conservatives to be enraged about. Despite the fact that I distinctly remember that being an issue amongst SJWs. But hey according to everyone else we were always at war with Oceana.
All Captain X is saying is that both sides will use the same argument when it suits them.
bintananth
behind a desk
The commies didn't win. As the local leftie socialist I want things to be the 50s ideal: your wife gets to stay at home while you work and the kids go to school.
That wasn't really possible in the '50s for Americans who weren't like my great-grandparents. They could afford to send all three of their kids to college in the 1940s ... when only about 1/20 Americans did get more than a HS education.
Poe
Well-known member
We are discussing a hypothetical of *if* they win in the future are they legitimate.
bintananth
behind a desk
Poe
Well-known member
Again, this is unrelated to anything we are discussing here. We are talking about what makes a legitimate state and you seem to be going off on some hilariously unrelated tangent.
Cool, this is still not related tho
Poe
Well-known member
What the fuck are you talking about? We are discussing a hypothetical scenario where victory has already been achieved, and how having that victory and holding the land, holding the monopoly on violence over it, makes you the legitimate government over the land. This entire sentence is a fallacy and seems to be the product of someone who hasn't followed the chain of discussion at all. Seriously not a single one of these sentences is an actual response to any comment I've made in this thread and they are at best appeals to emotion, at worse complete non-sequiturs.