Antifa has plenty of organizing figures like Spencer. They just aren't CNN's pet Nazi, so you don't hear about them, and the equivalent to Spencer on Antifia's side aren't as heavily connected (by the media) to Antifa as Spencer is: they're "legit" heads of groups like professors, public speakers, and Nonprofit organization heads, who just so happen to have strong Antifa connections, unlike "illegitimate" public speaker and nonprofit head Spencer, who has (sometimes extremely tenuous) connections to organizations, or so often random individuals, who commit violence.
Like, the equivalent of Richard Spencer for Antifa is someone like Owen Jones: does public speaking, pushes the ideology, and does fundraising for them. Its just that Richard Spencer is connected to every act of violence that happens, no matter whether he condemned it or not, while someone like Owen Jones is treated as blameless for violence he specifically calls for.
Its anoying that people keep calling large, organized, well funded, politically connected armed gangs "spontanious, random violence, and totally not an organization". But a random nutter deciding to get violent and kill someone who had no connection to any organization and did his violence with no support at all is part of some vast, right wing conspiracy.
I'm sorry, but I consider the vast, organized army far more dangerous than random lone nutters. The organized army can, and actually does, wield political power. Them not killing people is much more a sign of their immense power that they don't need to, rather than a moral superiority.
